"[...] there is evidence that significance tests have been a genuine block to achieving [...] knowledge." (Denton E Morrison & Ramon E Henkel, "Significance tests reconsidered", The American Sociologist 4, 1969)
"Confidence intervals give a feeling of the uncertainty of experimental evidence, and (very important) give it in the same units [...] as the original observations." (Mary G Natrella, "The relation between confidence intervals and tests of significance", American Statistician 14, 1960)
"The null-hypothesis significance test treats ‘acceptance’ or ‘rejection’ of a hypothesis as though these were decisions one makes. But a hypothesis is not something, like a piece of pie offered for dessert, which can be accepted or rejected by a voluntary physical action. Acceptance or rejection of a hypothesis is a cognitive process, a degree of believing or disbelieving which, if rational, is not a matter of choice but determined solely by how likely it is, given the evidence, that the hypothesis is true." (William W Rozeboom, "The fallacy of the null–hypothesis significance test", Psychological Bulletin 57, 1960)
"Scientific discovery, or the formulation of scientific theory, starts in with the unvarnished and unembroidered evidence of the senses. It starts with simple observation - simple, unbiased, unprejudiced, naive, or innocent observation - and out of this sensory evidence, embodied in the form of simple propositions or declarations of fact, generalizations will grow up and take shape, almost as if some process of crystallization or condensation were taking place. Out of a disorderly array of facts, an orderly theory, an orderly general statement, will somehow emerge." (Sir Peter B Medawar, "Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent?", The Saturday Review, 1964)
"We have overwhelming evidence that available information plus analysis does not lead to knowledge. The management science team can properly analyse a situation and present recommendations to the manager, but no change occurs. The situation is so familiar to those of us who try to practice management science that I hardly need to describe the cases." (C West Churchman, "Managerial acceptance of scientific recommendations", California Management Review Vol 7, 1964)
"Science consists simply of the formulation and testing of hypotheses based on observational evidence; experiments are important where applicable, but their function is merely to simplify observation by imposing controlled conditions." (Henry L Batten, "Evolution of the Earth", 1971)
"Statistics is a body of methods and theory applied to numerical evidence in making decisions in the face of uncertainty." (Lawrence Lapin, "Statistics for Modern Business Decisions", 1973)
"The language of association and prediction is probably most often used because the evidence seems insufficient to justify a direct causal statement. A better practice is to state the causal hypothesis and then to present the evidence along with an assessment with respect to the causal hypothesis - instead of letting the quality of the data determine the language of the explanation.
"All interpretations made by a scientist are hypotheses, and all hypotheses are tentative. They must forever be tested and they must be revised if found to be unsatisfactory. Hence, a change of mind in a scientist, and particularly in a great scientist, is not only not a sign of weakness but rather evidence for continuing attention to the respective problem and an ability to test the hypothesis again and again." (Ernst Mayr, "The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance", 1982)
"It has been widely felt, probably for thirty years and more, that significance tests are overemphasized and often misused and that more emphasis should be put on estimation and prediction. While such a shift of emphasis does seem to be occurring, for example in medical statistics, the continued very extensive use of significance tests is on the one hand alarming and on the other evidence that they are aimed, even if imperfectly, at some widely felt need." (David R Cox, "Some general aspects of the theory of statistics", International Statistical Review 54, 1986)
"Like a detective, a data analyst will experience many dead ends, retrace his steps, and explore many alternatives before settling on a single description of the evidence in front of him." (David Lubinsky & Daryl Pregibon , "Data analysis as search", Journal of Econometrics Vol. 38 (1–2), 1988)
"Subjective probability, also known as Bayesian statistics, pushes Bayes' theorem further by applying it to statements of the type described as 'unscientific' in the frequency definition. The probability of a theory (e.g. that it will rain tomorrow or that parity is not violated) is considered to be a subjective 'degree of belief - it can perhaps be measured by seeing what odds the person concerned will offer as a bet. Subsequent experimental evidence then modifies the initial degree of belief, making it stronger or weaker according to whether the results agree or disagree with the predictions of the theory in question." (Roger J Barlow, "Statistics: A guide to the use of statistical methods in the physical sciences", 1989)
"Probability theory is an ideal tool for formalizing uncertainty in situations where class frequencies are known or where evidence is based on outcomes of a sufficiently long series of independent random experiments. Possibility theory, on the other hand, is ideal for formalizing incomplete information expressed in terms of fuzzy propositions." (George Klir, "Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic", 1995)
"[…] the simplest hypothesis proposed as an explanation of phenomena is more likely to be the true one than is any other available hypothesis, that its predictions are more likely to be true than those of any other available hypothesis, and that it is an ultimate a priori epistemic principle that simplicity is evidence for truth." (Richard Swinburne, "Simplicity as Evidence for Truth", 1997)
"When significance tests are used and a null hypothesis is not rejected, a major problem often arises - namely, the result may be interpreted, without a logical basis, as providing evidence for the null hypothesis." (David F Parkhurst, "Statistical Significance Tests: Equivalence and Reverse Tests Should Reduce Misinterpretation", BioScience Vol. 51 (12), 2001)
"One cautious approach is represented by Bernoulli’s more conservative outlook. If there are very strong reasons for believing that an observation has suffered an accident that made the value in the data-file thoroughly untrustworthy, then reject it; in the absence of clear evidence that an observation, identified by formal rule as an outlier, is unacceptable then retain it unless there is lack of trust that the laboratory obtaining it is conscientiously operated by able persons who have [...] taken every care.'" (David Finney, "Calibration Guidelines Challenge Outlier Practices", The American Statistician Vol 60 (4), 2006)
"Scholars feel the need to present tables of model parameters in academic articles (perhaps just as evidence that they ran the analysis they claimed to have run), but these tables are rarely interpreted other than for their sign and statistical significance. Most of the numbers in these tables are never even discussed in the text. From the perspective of the applied data analyst, R packages without procedures to compute quantities of scientific interest are woefully incomplete. A better approach focuses on quantities of direct scientific interest rather than uninterpretable model parameters. [...] For each quantity of interest, the user needs some summary that includes a point estimate and a measure of uncertainty such as a standard error, confidence interval, or a distribution. The methods of calculating these differ greatly across theories of inference and methods of analysis. However, from the user’s perspective, the result is almost always the same: the point estimate and uncertainty of some quantity of interest." (Kousuke Imai et al, "Toward a Common Framework for Statistical Analysis and Development", Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics vol. 17, 2008)
"Data analysis is careful thinking about evidence." (Michael Milton, "Head First Data Analysis", 2009)
"Data clusters are everywhere, even in random data. Someone who looks for an explanation will inevitably find one, but a theory that fits a data cluster is not persuasive evidence. The found explanation needs to make sense and it needs to be tested with uncontaminated data."
"In general, when building statistical models, we must not forget that the aim is to understand something about the real world. Or predict, choose an action, make a decision, summarize evidence, and so on, but always about the real world, not an abstract mathematical world: our models are not the reality - a point well made by George Box in his oft-cited remark that "all models are wrong, but some are useful". (David Hand, "Wonderful examples, but let's not close our eyes", Statistical Science 29, 2014)
"The dialectical interplay of experiment and theory is a key driving force of modern science. Experimental data do only have meaning in the light of a particular model or at least a theoretical background. Reversely theoretical considerations may be logically consistent as well as intellectually elegant: Without experimental evidence they are a mere exercise of thought no matter how difficult they are. Data analysis is a connector between experiment and theory: Its techniques advise possibilities of model extraction as well as model testing with experimental data."
"In terms of characteristics, a data scientist has an inquisitive mind and is prepared to explore and ask questions, examine assumptions and analyse processes, test hypotheses and try out solutions and, based on evidence, communicate informed conclusions, recommendations and caveats to stakeholders and decision makers." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)
"With the growing availability of massive data sets and user-friendly analysis software, it might be thought that there is less need for training in statistical methods. This would be naïve in the extreme. Far from freeing us from the need for statistical skills, bigger data and the rise in the number and complexity of scientific studies makes it even more difficult to draw appropriate conclusions. More data means that we need to be even more aware of what the evidence is actually worth." (David Spiegelhalter, "The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data", 2019)
"The general principles of starting with a well-defined question, engaging in careful observation, and then formulating hypotheses and assessing the strength of evidence for and against them became known as the scientific method." (Michael Friendly & Howard Wainer, "A History of Data Visualization and Graphic Communication", 2021)
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." (Martin Rees)
"The deepest sin of the human mind is to believe things without evidence." (Thomas H Huxley)
No comments:
Post a Comment