🏭🗒️Microsoft Fabric: The Metrics Layer [Notes] [new feature]

Disclaimer: This is work in progress intended to consolidate information from various sources for learning purposes. For the latest information please consult the documentation (see the links below)! 

Last updated: 07-May-2024

The Metrics Layer in Microsoft Fabric (adapted diagram)

[new feature] Metrics Layer (Metrics Store)

• {definition}an abstraction layer available between the data store(s) and end users which allows organizations to create standardized business metrics, that are rooted in measures and are discoverable and intended for reuse
• ⇐ {important} feature still in private preview 
• {goal} extend existing infrastructure 
• {benefit} leverages and extends existing features
• {goal} provide consistent definitions and descriptions [1]
• consistent definitions that include besides business logic additional dimensions and filters [1]
• ⇒ {benefit} allows to standardize the metrics across the organization
• ⇒ {benefit} enforce to enforce a SSoT
• {goal} easy management 
• via management views 
• [feature] lineage 
• [feature] source control
• [feature] duplicate identification
• [feature] push updates to downstream uses of the metrics 
• {goal}searchable and discoverable metrics 
• {feature} integration
• based on Sempy fabric package
• ⇐ a dataframe for storage and propagation of Power BI metadata which is part of the python-based semantic Link in Fabric
• {goal}trust
• [feature] trust indicators
• {benefit} facilitates report's adoption
• {feature} metric set 
• {definition} a Fabric item that groups together a set of metrics into a mini-model
• {benefit} allows to reduce the overall complexity of semantic models, while being easy to evolve and consume
• associated with a single domain
• ⇒ supports the data mesh architecture
• shareable 
• can be shared with other users
• {action} create metric set
• creates the actual artifact, to which metrics can be added 
• {feature} metric
•  {definition} a way to elevate the measures from the various semantic models existing in the organization
• tied to the original semantic model
• ⇒ {benefit} allows to see how a metric is used across the solutions 
• reusable
• can be reused in other fabric artifacts
• new reports on the Power BI service
• notebooks 
• by copying the code
• can be reused in Power BI
• via OneLake data hub menu element
• can be chained 
• changes are propagated downstream 
• materializable 
• its output can be persisted to OneLake by saving it a delta table into a lakehouse
• {misuse} data is persisted unnecessarily
• {action} elevate metric
• copies measure's definition and description
• ⇒  implies restructuring, refactoring, moving, and testing a lot of code in the process
• {misuse} data professionals build everything as metrics
• {action} update metric
• {action} add filters to metric 
• {action} add dimensions to metric
• {action} materialize metric 

Previous Post <<||>>  Next Post

Acronyms:
SSoT - single source of truth ()

References:
[1] Power BI Tips (2024) Explicit Measures Ep. 236: Metrics Hub, Hot New Feature with Carly Newsome (link)
[2] Power BI Tips (2024) Introducing Fabric Metrics Layer / Power Metrics Hub [with Carly Newsome] (link)

🧭🏭Business Intelligence: Microsoft Fabric (Part III: The Metrics Layer [new feature])

Introduction

One of the announcements of this year's Microsoft Fabric Community first conference was the introduction of a metrics layer in Fabric which "allows organizations to create standardized business metrics, that are rooted in measures and are discoverable and intended for reuse" [1]. As it seems, the information content provided at the conference was kept to a minimum given that the feature is still in private preview, though several webcasts start to catch up on the topic (see [2], [4]). Moreover, as part of their show, the Explicit Measures (@PowerBITips) hosts had Carly Newsome as invitee, the manager of the project, who unveiled more details about the project and the feature, details which became the main source for the information below. 

The idea of a metric layer or metric store is not new, data professionals occasionally refer to their structure(s) of metrics as such. The terms gained weight in their modern conception relatively recently in 2021-2022 (see [5], [6], [7], [8], [10]). Within the modern data stack, a metrics layer or metric store is an abstraction layer available between the data store(s) and end users. It allows to centrally define, store, and manage business metrics. Thus, it allows us to standardize and enforce a single source of truth (SSoT), respectively solve several issues existing in the data stacks. As Benn Stancil earlier remarked, the metrics layer is one of the missing pieces from the modern data stack (see [10]).

Microsoft's Solution

Microsoft's business case for metrics layer's implementation is based on three main ideas (1) duplicate measures contribute to poor data quality, (2) complex data models hinder self-service, (3) reduce data silos in Power BI. In Microsoft's conception the metric layer provides several benefits: consistent definitions and descriptions, easy management via management views, searchable and discoverable metrics, respectively assure trust through indicators. 

For this feature's implementation Microsoft introduces a new Fabric Item called a metric set that allows to group several (business) metrics together as part of a mini-model that can be tailored to the needs of a subset of end-users and accessed by them via the standard tools already available. The metric set becomes thus a mini-model. Such mini-models allow to break down and reduce the overall complexity of semantic models, while being easy to evolve and consume. The challenge will become then on how to break down existing and future semantic models into nonoverlapping mini-models, creating in extremis a partition (see the Lego metaphor for data products). The idea of mini-models is not new, [12] advocating the idea of using a Master Model, a technique for creating derivative tabular models based on a single tabular solution.

A (business) metric is a way to elevate the measures from the various semantic models existing in the organization within the mini-model defined by the metric set. A metric can be reused in other fabric artifacts - currently in new reports on the Power BI service, respectively in notebooks by copying the code. Reusing metrics in other measures can mean that one can chain metrics and the changes made will be further propagated downstream. 

The Metrics Layer in Microsoft Fabric (adapted diagram)

Every metric is tied to the original semantic model which allows thus to track how a metric is used across the solutions and, looking forward to Purview, to identify data's lineage. A measure is related to a "table", the source from which the measure came from.

Users' Perspective

The Metrics Layer feature is available in Microsoft Fabric service for Power BI within the Metrics menu element next to Scorecards. One starts by creating a metric set in an existing workspace, an operation which creates the actual artifact, to which the individual metrics are added. To create a metric, a user with build permissions can navigate through the semantic models across different workspaces he/she has access to, pick a measure from one of them and elevate it to a metric, copying in the process its measure's definition and description. In this way the metric will always point back to the measure from the semantic model, while the metrics thus created are considered as a related collection and can be shared around accordingly. 

Once a metric is added to the metric set, one can add in edit mode dimensions to it (e.g. Date, Category, Product Id, etc.). One can then further explore a metric's output and add filters (e.g. concentrate on only one product or category) point from which one can slice-and-dice the data as needed.

There is a panel where one can see where the metric has been used (e.g. in reports, scorecards, and other integrations), when was last time refreshed, respectively how many times was used. Thus, one has the most important information in one place, which is great for developers as well as for the users. Probably, other metadata will be added, such as whether an increase in the metric would be favorable or unfavorable (like in Tableau Pulse, see [13]) or maybe levels of criticality, an unit of measure, or maybe its type - simple metric, performance indicator (PI), result indicator (RI), KPI, KRI etc.

Metrics can be persisted to the OneLake by saving their output to a delta table into the lakehouse. As demonstrated in the presentation(s), with just a copy-paste and a small piece of code one can materialize the data into a lakehouse delta table, from where the data can be reused as needed. Hopefully, the process will be further automated. 

One can consume metrics and metrics sets also in Power BI Desktop, where a new menu element called Metric sets was added under the OneLake data hub, which can be used to connect to a metric set from a Semantic model and select the metrics needed for the project. 

Tapping into the available Power BI solutions is done via an integration feature based on Sempy fabric package, a dataframe for storage and propagation of Power BI metadata which is part of the python-based semantic Link in Fabric [11].

Further Thoughts

When dealing with a new feature, a natural idea comes to mind: what challenges does the feature involve, respectively how can it be misused? Given that the metrics layer can be built within a workspace and that it can tap into the existing measures, this means that one can built on the existing infrastructure. However, this can imply restructuring, refactoring, moving, and testing a lot of code in the process, hopefully with minimal implications for the solutions already available. Whether the process is as simple as imagined is another story. As misusage, in extremis, data professionals might start building everything as metrics, though the danger might come when the data is persisted unnecessarily. 

From a data mesh's perspective, a metric set is associated with a domain, though there will be metrics and data common to multiple domains. Moreover, a mini-model has the potential of becoming a data product. Distributing the logic across multiple workspaces and domains can add further challenges, especially in what concerns the synchronization and implemented of requirements in a way that doesn't lead to bottlenecks. But this is a general challenge for the development team(s). 

The feature will probably suffer further changes until is released in public review (probably by September or the end of the year). I subscribe to other data professionals' opinion that the feature was for long needed and that can have an important impact on the solutions built. 

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

Resources:
[1] Microsoft Fabric Blog (2024) Announcements from the Microsoft Fabric Community Conference (link)
[2] Power BI Tips (2024) Explicit Measures Ep. 236: Metrics Hub, Hot New Feature with Carly Newsome (link)
[3] Power BI Tips (2024) Introducing Fabric Metrics Layer / Power Metrics Hub [with Carly Newsome] (link)
[4] KratosBI (2024) Fabric Fridays: Metrics Layer Conspiracy Theories #40 (link)
[5] Chris Webb's BI Blog (2022) Is Power BI A Semantic Layer? (link)
[6] The Data Stack Show (2022) TDSS 95: How the Metrics Layer Bridges the Gap Between Data & Business with Nick Handel of Transform (link)
[7] Sundeep Teki (2022) The Metric Layer & how it fits into the Modern Data Stack (link)
[8] Nick Handel (2021) A brief history of the metrics store (link)
[9] Aurimas (2022) The Jungle of Metrics Layers and its Invisible Elephant (link)
[10] Benn Stancil (2021) The missing piece of the modern data stack (link)
[11] Microsoft Learn (2024) Sempy fabric Package (link)
[12] Michael Kovalsky (2019) Master Model: Creating Derivative Tabular Models (link)
[13] Christina Obry (2023) The Power of a Metrics Layer - and How Your Organization Can Benefit From It (link) 
[14] KratosBI (2024) Introducing the Metrics Layer in #MicrosoftFabric with Carly Newsome [link]

⚡️Power BI: Working with Visual Calculations (Part II: Simple Tables with Square Numbers as Example)

Introduction

The records behind a visual can be mentally represented as a matrix, the visual calculations allowing to tap into this structure intuitively and simplify many of the visualizations used. After a general test drive of the functionality, it makes sense to dive deeper into the topic to understand more about the limitations, functions behavior and what it takes to fill the gaps. This post focuses on simple tables, following in a next post to focus on matrices and a few other topics. 

For exemplification, it makes sense to use a simple set of small numbers that are easy to work with, and magic squares seem to match this profile. A magic square is a matrix of positive sequential numbers in which each row, each column, and both main diagonals are the same [1]. Thus, a square of order N has N*N numbers from 1 to N*N, the non-trivial case being order 3. However, from the case of non-trivial squares, the one of order 5 provides a low order and allows hopefully the minimum needed for exemplification:

18	25	2	9	11
4	6	13	20	22
15	17	24	1	8
21	3	10	12	19
7	14	16	23	5
1	7	13	19	25

Data Modeling

One magic square should be enough to exemplify the various operations, though for testing purposes it makes sense to have a few more squares readily available. Each square has an [Id], [C1] to [C5] corresponds to matrix's columns, while [R] stores a row identifier which allows to sort the values the way they are stored in the matrix:

let
    Source = #table({"Id","C1","C2","C3","C4","C5","R"}
, {
{1,18,25,2,9,11,"R1"},
{1,4,6,13,20,22,"R2"},
{1,15,17,24,1,8,"R3"},
{1,21,3,10,12,19,"R4"},
{1,7,14,16,23,5,"R5"},
{2,1,7,13,19,25,"R1"},
{2,14,20,21,2,5,"R2"},
{2,22,3,9,15,16,"R3"},
{2,10,11,17,23,4,"R4"},
{2,18,24,5,6,12,"R5"},
{3,1,2,22,25,15,"R1"},
{3,9,10,16,11,19,"R2"},
{3,17,23,13,5,7,"R3"},
{3,24,12,6,20,3,"R4"},
{3,14,18,8,4,21,"R5"},
{4,22,6,3,18,16,"R1"},
{4,4,14,11,15,21,"R2"},
{4,5,8,12,23,17,"R3"},
{4,25,13,19,7,1,"R4"},
{4,9,24,20,2,10,"R5"},
{5,5,9,20,25,6,"R1"},
{5,13,15,2,11,24,"R2"},
{5,21,1,23,3,17,"R3"},
{5,19,18,4,14,10,"R4"},
{5,7,22,16,12,8,"R5"}
}
),
    #"Changed Type to Number" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Source,{{"C1", Int64.Type}, {"C2", Int64.Type}, {"C3", Int64.Type}, {"C4", Int64.Type}, {"C5", Int64.Type}}),
    #"Sorted Rows" = Table.Sort(#"Changed Type to Number",{{"Id", Order.Ascending}, {"R", Order.Ascending}}),
    #"Added Index" = Table.AddIndexColumn(#"Sorted Rows", "Index", 0, 1, Int64.Type)
in
    #"Added Index"

The column names and the row identifier could have been numeric values from 1 to 5, though it could have been confounded with the actual numeric values.

In addition, the columns [C1] to [C5] were formatted as integers and an index was added after sorting the values after [Id] and [R]. Copy the above code as a Blank Query in Power BI and change the name to Magic5. 

Prerequisites

For the further steps you'll need to enable visual calculations in Power BI Developer via:
File >> Options and settings >> Options >> Preview features >> Visual calculations >> (check)

Into a Table visual drag and drop [R], [C1] to [C5] as column and make sure that the records are sorted ascending by [R]. To select only a square, add a filter based on the [Id] and select the first square. Use further copies of this visual for further tests. 

Some basic notions of Algebra are recommended but not a must. If you worked with formulas in Excel, then you are set to go. 

In Mathematics a matrix starts from the top left side and one moves on the rows (e.g. 18, 25, 2, ...) and then on the columns. With a few exceptions in which the reference is based on the latest value from a series (see Exchange rates), this is the direction that will be followed. 

Basic Operations

Same as in Excel [C1] + [C2] creates a third column in the matrix that stores the sum of the two. The sum can be further applies to all the columns:

Sum(C) = [C1] + [C2] + [C3] + [C4] + [C5] -- sum of all columns (should amount to 65)

The column can be called "Sum", "Sum(C)" or any other allowed unique name, though the names should be meaningful, useful, and succinct, when possible.

Similarly, one can work with constants, linear or nonlinear transformations (each formula is a distinct calculation):

constant = 1 -- constant value
linear = 2*[C1] + 1 -- linear translation: 2*x+1

linear2 = 2*[C1] + [constant] -- linear translation: 2*x+1
quadratic = Power([C1],2) + 2*[C1] + 1 -- quadratic translation: x^2+2*x+1
quadratic2 = Power([C1],2) + [linear] -- quadratic translation: x^2+2*x+1

Output:

R	C1	constant	linear	linear2	quadratic	quadratic2
R1	18	1	37	37	361	361
R2	4	1	9	9	25	25
R3	15	1	31	31	256	256
R4	21	1	43	43	484	484
R5	7	1	15	15	64	64

Please note that the output was duplicated in Excel (instead of making screenshots).

Similarly, can be build any type of formulas based on one or more columns.

With a simple trick, one can use DAX functions like SUMX, PRODUCTX, MINX or MAXX as well:

Sum2(C) = SUMX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]}, [Value]) -- sum of all columns

Prod(C) = PRODUCTX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]}, [Value]) -- product of all columns

Avg(C) = AVERAGEX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]}, [Value]) -- average of all columns

Min(C) = MINX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]}, [Value]) -- minimum value of all columns

Max(C) = MAXX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]}, [Value]) -- maximum value of all columns
Count(C) = COUNTX({[C1], [C2], [C3], [C4], [C5]},[Value]) -- counts the number of columns

Output:

C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	Sum(C)	Avg(C)	Prod(C)	Min(C)	Max(C)	Count(C)
18	25	2	9	11	65	13	89100	2	25	5
4	6	13	20	22	65	13	137280	4	22	5
15	17	24	1	8	65	13	48960	1	24	5
21	3	10	12	19	65	13	143640	3	21	5
7	14	16	23	5	65	13	180320	5	23	5

Unfortunately, currently there seems to be no way available for applying such calculations without referencing the individual columns. 

Working across Rows

ROWNUMBER and RANK allow to rank a cell within a column independently, respectively dependently of its value:

Ranking = ROWNUMBER() -- returns the rank in the column (independently of the value)
RankA(C) = RANK(DENSE, ORDERBY([C1], ASC)) -- ranking of the value (ascending) 

RankD(C) = RANK(DENSE, ORDERBY([C1], DESC)) -- ranking of the value (descending) 

Output:

R	C1	Ranking	RankA(C)	RankD(C)
R1	18	1	4	2
R2	4	2	1	5
R3	15	3	3	3
R4	21	4	5	1
R5	7	5	2	4

PREVIOUS, NEXT, LAST and FIRST allow to refer to the values of other cells within the same column:

Prev(C) = PREVIOUS([C1]) -- previous cell
Next(C) = NEXT([C1])  -- next cell

First(C) = FIRST([C1]) -- first cell
Last(C) = LAST([C1]) -- last cell

Output:

R	C1	Prev(C)	NextC)	First(C)	Last(C)
R1	18		4	18	7
R2	4	18	15	18	7
R3	15	4	21	18	7
R4	21	15	7	18	7
R5	7	21		18	7

OFFSET is a generalization of these functions

offset(2) = calculate([C1], offset(2)) -- 
offset(-2) = calculate([C1], offset(-2))
Ind = ROWNUMBER() -- index
inverse = calculate([C1], offset(6-2*[Ind])) -- inversing the values based on index

Output:

R	C1	offset(2)	offset(-2)	ind	inverse
R1	18	15		1	7
R2	4	21		2	21
R3	15	7	18	3	15
R4	21		4	4	4
R5	7		15	5	18

The same functions allow to calculate the differences for consecutive values:

DiffToPrev(C) = [C1] - PREVIOUS([C1]) -- difference to previous 
DiffToNext(C) = [C1] - PREVIOUS([C1]) -- difference to next 
DiffTtoFirst(C) = [C1] - FIRST([C1]) -- difference to first
DiffToLast(C) = [C1] - LAST([C1]) -- difference to last

Output:

R	C1	DiffToPrev(C)	DiffToNextC)	DiffToFirst(C)	DiffToLast(C)
R1	18	18	14	0	11
R2	4	-14	-11	-14	-3
R3	15	11	-6	-3	8
R4	21	6	14	3	14
R5	7	-14	7	-11	0

DAX makes available several functions for working across the rows of the same column. Two of the useful functions are RUNNINGSUM and MOVINGAVERAGE:

Run Sum(C) = RUNNINGSUM([C1]) -- running sum

Moving Avg3(C) = MOVINGAVERAGE([C1], 3) -- moving average for the past 3 values

Moving Avg2(C) = MOVINGAVERAGE([C1], 2) -- moving average for the past 2 values

Unfortunately, one can use only the default sorting of the table with the functions that don't support the ORDERBY parameter. Therefore, when the table needs to be sorted descending and the RUNNINGSUM calculated ascending, for the moment there's no solution to achieve this behavior. However, it appears that Microsoft is planning to implement a solution for this issue.

RUNNINGSUM together with ROWNUMBER can be used to calculate a running average:

Run Avg(C) = DIVIDE(RUNNINGSUM([C1]), ROWNUMBER()) -- running average

Output:

R	C1	Run Sum(C)	Moving Avg3(C)	Moving Avg2(C)	Run Avg(C)
R1	18	18	18	18	18
R2	4	22	11	11	11
R3	15	37	12.33	9.5	12.33
R4	21	58	13.33	18	14.5
R5	7	65	14.33	14	13

With a mathematical trick that allows to transform a product into a sum of elements by applying the Exp (exponential) and Log (logarithm) functions (see the solution in SQL), one can run the PRODUCT across rows, though the values must be small enough to allow their multiplication without running into issues:

Ln(C) = IFERROR(LN([C1]), Blank()) -- applying the natural logarithm
Sum(Ln(C)) = RUNNINGSUM([Ln(C)]) -- running sum
Run Prod(C) = IF(NOT(ISBLANK([Sum(Ln(C))])), Exp([Sum(Ln(C))])) -- product across rows

Output:

R	C1	Ln(C)	Sum(Ln(C))	Run Prod(C)
R1	18	2.89	2.89	18
R2	4	1.39	4.28	72
R3	15	2.71	6.98	1080
R4	21	3.04	10.03	22680
R5	7	1.95	11.98	158760

These three calculations could be brought into a single formula, though the result could be more difficult to troubleshoot. The test via IsBlank is necessary because otherwise the exponential for the total raises an error. 

Considering that when traversing a column it's enough to remember the previous value, one can build MIN and MAX functionality across a column: 

Run Min = IF(OR(Previous([C1]) > [C1], IsBlank(Previous([C1]))), [C1], Previous([C1])) -- minimum value across rows
Run Max = IF(OR(Previous([C1]) < [C1], IsBlank(Previous([C1]))), [C1], Previous([C1])) -- maximum across rows

Happy coding!

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

References:
[1] Wikipedia (2024) Magic Squares (online)
[2] Microsoft Learn (2024) Power BI: Using visual calculations [preview] (link)

⚡️🗒️Power BI: Working with Visual Calculations (Part I: Test Drive) [new feature]

Introduction

I recently watched a webcast with Jeroen (Jay) ter Heerdt (see [2]) in which he introduces visual calculations, a type of DAX calculation that's defined and executed directly on a visual [1]. Visual calculations provide an approach of treating a set of data much like an Excel table, allowing to refer to any field available on a visual and write formulas, which simplifies considerably the solutions used currently for ranking records, running averages and other windowing functions. 

The records behind a visual can be mentally represented as a matrix, while the visual calculations can refer to any column from the matrix, allowing to add new columns and include the respective columns in further calculations. Moreover, if a column is used in a formula, it's not recalculated as is the case of measures, which should improve the performance of DAX formulas considerably. 

Currently, one can copy a formula between visuals and if the formula contains fields not available in the targeted visual, they are added as well. Conversely, it's possible to build such a visual, copy it and then replace the dimension on which the analysis is made (e.g. Customer with Product), without being needed to make further changes. Unfortunately, there are also downsides: (1) the calculations are visible only within the visual in which were defined; (2) currently, the visual's data can't be exported if a visual calculation is added; (3) no formatting is supported, etc.

Ranking and Differences

I started to build a solution based on publicly available sales data, which offers a good basis for testing the use of visual calculations. Based on a Power BI visual table made of [Customer Name], [Sales Amount], [Revenue] and [Total Discount], I've added several calculations:

-- percentages
Sales % = 100*DIVIDE([Sales Amount], COLLAPSE([Sales Amount], ROWS))
Revenue % = 100*DIVIDE([Revenue],[Sales Amount])
Discount % = 100*DIVIDE([Total  Discount], [Total  Discount]+[Sales Amount])

-- rankings 
Rank Sales = Rank(DENSE, ORDERBY([Sales Amount], DESC))
Rank Revenue = Rank(DENSE, ORDERBY([Revenue], DESC))

-- differences between consecutive values
Diff. to Prev. Sales = IF([Rank Sales]>1, INDEX([Rank Sales]-1, , ORDERBY([Sales Amount], DESC)) - [Sales Amount] , BLANK())
Diff. to Prev. Rev. = IF([Rank Revenue]>1, INDEX([Rank Revenue]-1, , ORDERBY([Revenue], DESC)) - [Revenue] , BLANK())

Here's the output considered only for the first 10 records sorted by [Sales Amount]:

Customer Name	Sales Amount	Sales %	Revenue	Revenue %	Total Discount	Discount %	Rank Sales	Diff. to Prev. Sales.	Rank Rev.	Diff. to Prev. Rev.
Medline	1058923.78	3.76	307761.99	3.75	126601.02	10.68	1		1
Ei	707663.21	2.51	229866.98	2.8	95124.09	11.85	2	351260.57	2	77895.01
Elorac, Corp	702911.91	2.49	209078.76	2.55	83192.39	10.58	3	4751.3	6	20788.22
Sundial	694918.98	2.47	213362.1	2.6	78401.72	10.14	4	7992.93	4	-4283.34
OUR Ltd	691687.4	2.45	196396.26	2.4	78732.2	10.22	5	3231.58	10	16965.84
Eminence Corp	681612.78	2.42	213002.78	2.6	86904.03	11.31	6	10074.62	5	-16606.52
Apotheca, Ltd	667283.99	2.37	157435.56	1.92	101453.91	13.2	7	14328.79	31	55567.22
Rochester Ltd	662943.9	2.35	224918.2	2.74	81158.11	10.91	8	4340.09	3	-67482.64
ETUDE Ltd	658370.48	2.34	205432.79	2.51	89322.72	11.95	9	4573.42	9	19485.41
Llorens Ltd	646779.31	2.29	206567.4	2.52	82897.59	11.36	10	11591.17	8	-1134.61

Comments:
1) One could use [Total Amount] = [Total  Discount]+[Sales Amount] as a separate column.
2) The [Rank Sales] is different from the [Rank Rev.] because of the discount applied.
3) In the last two formulas a blank was considered for the first item from the ranking.
4) It's not possible to control when the totals should be displayed, however one can change the color for the not needed total to match the background.

Visualizing Differences 

Once the formulas are added, one can hide the basis columns and visualize the data as needed. To obtain the below chart I copied the visual and changed the column as follows:

Diff. to Prev. Rev. = IF([Rank Revenue]>1, [Revenue]- INDEX([Rank Revenue]-1, , ORDERBY([Revenue], DESC)) , [Revenue]) -- modified column

Comments:

1) Instead of showing the full revenue, the chart shows only the differences from the highest revenue, where the column in green is the highest revenue, while the columns in red are the differences of the current customer's revenue to the previous customer, as the data are sorted by the highest revenue. At least in this case it results in a lower data-ink ratio (see Tufte).

2) The values are sorted by the [Revenue] descending. 

3) Unfortunately, it's not possible to change the names from the legend.

Simple Moving Averages (SMAs)

Based on the [Sales Amount], [Revenue] and [Month] one can add the following DAX formulas to the table for calculating the SMA:

Sales Amount (SMA) = MOVINGAVERAGE([Sales Amount],6)
Revenue (SMA) = MOVINGAVERAGE([Revenue],6)

The chart becomes:

Comments:

1) Unfortunately, the formula can't project the values into the feature, at least not without the proper dates.
2) "Show items with not data" feature seems to be disabled when visual calculations are used.

3) The SMA was created via a template formula. Similarly, calculating a running sum is reduced to applying a formula:

Running Sales Amount = RUNNINGSUM([Sales Amount])

Wrap Up

It's easier to start with a table for the visual, construct the needed formulas and then use the proper visual while eliminating the not needed fields. 

The feature is still in public preview and changes can still occur. Unfortunately, there's still no information available on the general availability date. From the first tests, it provides considerable power with a minimum of effort, which is great! I don't want to think how long I would have needed to obtain the same results without it!

Happy coding!

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

References: 
[1] Microsoft Learn (2024) Power BI: Using visual calculations [preview] (link)
[2] SSBI Central (2024) Visual Calculations - Making DAX easier, with Jeroen ter Heerdt (link)

💎SQL Server: Copilot in Azure SQL Database is in Private Preview (SQL Reloaded) [new feature]

Following the news on Copilot and its adoption in the various areas, probably you asked yourself when it will become available in SQL Server. The good news is that the Copilot in Azure SQL Database is already in Private Preview (see [1], [2]). The bad news is that for the early adoption program, Microsoft looks only for customers that can provide feedback based on real-world use cases, and one will need a valid Tenant ID for signing up for the PP.

The new feature comes with two Azure portal experiences:

• Natural language to SQL: within the Azure portal query editor the natural language prompts are translated into SQL;
• Azure Copilot integration: provides customers with self-guided assistance for managing databases and troubleshooting. 

In the Data Exposed webcast with Anna Hoffman [1], the invitee, Joe Sack, showcases the use of both experiences. In what concerns the first experience, besides simple joins, Joe also showcased the use of a PIVOT based on the prompt:

"Show me a pivot summary table that displays the total number of properties sold in each year from 2020 to 2023".

-- output from Copilot
SELECT *
FROM 
(
	SELECT YEAR(SaleDate) AS Year, COUNT(*) AS TotalPropertiesSold
	FROM [PropertySearch].[dbo].[PropertyHistory]
	WHERE YEAR(SaleDate) BETWEEN 2020 AND 2023
	GROUP BY YEAR(SalesDate)
) AS PivotDate
PIVOT
(
	SUM(TotalPropertiesSold)
	FOR Year IN ([2020], [2021], [2022], [2023]
) AS PivotTable;

Even if this is a modest example, the great thing is that it generates the skeleton on which the logic can be built, which can really help beginners, though it can be also useful for more seasoned data professionals as it saves time. Probably, in a first phase this will be the main benefit of Copilot - to generate skeletons or templates on which further logic can be built. Hopefully in time it will do much more than that.

I wonder how complex the prompts can become and how can the logic be structured to create a multistep scenario. The Copilot versions from other areas showed that complex prompts give results, the question is whether Copilot can devise the steps in an optimum manner, much like a seasoned data professional does. 

The feature utilizes for the moment the table and view names, column names, primary key, and foreign key metadata to generate T-SQL code. Probably, it makes sense to also use index and statistics information, query hints and all the arsenal usually needed by data professionals to optimize a query. Conversely, maybe the second experience could be used for optimizing and troubleshooting the query. 

I'd really love to test this feature, though probably I'll need to wait until it becomes publicly available. In the meanwhile, one can play with the GitHub Copilot [3] or install Copilot in Azure Data Studio [4].

References:
[1] Data Exposed (2024) Introducing Copilot in Azure SQL Database (Private Preview) (link)
[2] Azure SQL Blog (2024) Microsoft Copilot in Azure extends capabilities to Azure SQL Database (Private Preview) by Joe Sack (link)
[3] Azure SQL Blog (2023) GitHub Copilot for SQL Developers: Turbocharge your SQL Development, by Subhojit Basak (link)
[4] Microsoft Developer (2023) Copilot is now in Azure Data Studio and this is how it can help you! (link)

💎SQL Reloaded: The WINDOW Clause in SQL Server 2022 (Part III: Ranking)

In two previous posts I shown how to use the newly introduced WINDOW clause in SQL Server 2022 for simple aggregations, respectively running totals, by providing some historical context concerning what it took to do the same simple aggregations as SUM or AVG within previous versions of SQL Server. Let's look at another scenario based on the previously created Sales.vSalesOrders view - ranking records within a partition. 

There are 4 ranking functions that work across partitions: Row_Number, Rank, Dense_Rank and NTile. However, in SQL Server 2000 only Row_Number could be easily implemented, and this only if there is a unique identifier (or one needed to create one on the fly):

-- ranking based on correlated subquery (SQL Server 2000+)
SELECT SOL.SalesOrderId 
, SOL.ProductId
, SOL.OrderDate
, SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty
, (-- correlated subquery
  SELECT count(SRT.SalesOrderId)
  FROM Sales.vSalesOrders SRT
  WHERE SRT.ProductId = SOL.ProductId 
    AND SRT.[Year] = SOL.[Year]
	AND SRT.[Month] = SOL.[Month]
    AND SRT.SalesOrderId <= SOL.SalesOrderId
   ) RowNumberByDate
FROM Sales.vSalesOrders SOL
WHERE SOL.ProductId IN (745)
  AND SOL.[Year] = 2012
  AND SOL.[Month] BETWEEN 1 AND 3
ORDER BY SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderDate ASC

As alternative for implementing the other ranking functions, one could use procedural language for looping, though this approach was not recommendable given the performance concerns.

SQL Server 2005 introduced all 4 ranking functions, as they are in use also today:

-- ranking functions (SQL Server 2005+)
SELECT SOL.SalesOrderId 
, SOL.ProductId
, SOL.OrderDate
, SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty
-- rankings
, Row_Number() OVER (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month] ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC) RowNumberQty
, Rank() OVER (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month] ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC) AS RankQty
, Dense_Rank() OVER (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month] ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC) AS DenseRankQty
, NTile(4) OVER (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month] ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC) AS NTileQty
FROM Sales.vSalesOrders SOL
WHERE SOL.ProductId IN (745)
  AND SOL.[Year] = 2012
  AND SOL.[Month] BETWEEN 1 AND 3
ORDER BY SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty DESC

Now, in SQL Server 2022 the WINDOW clause allows simplifying the query as follows by defining the partition only once:

-- ranking functions (SQL Server 2022+)
SELECT SOL.SalesOrderId 
, SOL.ProductId
, SOL.OrderDate
, SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty
-- rankings

, Row_Number() OVER SalesByMonth AS RowNumberQty
, Rank() OVER SalesByMonth AS RankQty
, Dense_Rank() OVER SalesByMonth AS DenseRankQty
, NTile(4) OVER SalesByMonth AS NTileQty
FROM Sales.vSalesOrders SOL
WHERE SOL.ProductId IN (745)
  AND SOL.[Year] = 2012
  AND SOL.[Month] BETWEEN 1 AND 3
WINDOW SalesByMonth AS (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month] ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC)
ORDER BY SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty DESC

Forward (and backward) referencing of one window into the other can be used with ranking functions as well:

 

-- ranking functions with ascending/descending sorting (SQL Server 2022+)
SELECT SOL.SalesOrderId 
, SOL.ProductId
, SOL.OrderDate
, SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty
-- rankings (descending)
, Row_Number() OVER SalesByMonthSortedDESC AS DescRowNumberQty
, Rank() OVER SalesByMonthSortedDESC AS DescRankQty
, Dense_Rank() OVER SalesByMonthSortedDESC AS DescDenseRankQty
, NTile(4) OVER SalesByMonthSortedDESC AS DescNTileQty
-- rankings (ascending)
, Row_Number() OVER SalesByMonthSortedASC AS AscRowNumberQty
, Rank() OVER SalesByMonthSortedASC AS AscRankQty
, Dense_Rank() OVER SalesByMonthSortedASC AS AscDenseRankQty
, NTile(4) OVER SalesByMonthSortedASC AS AscNTileQty
FROM Sales.vSalesOrders SOL
WHERE SOL.ProductId IN (745)
  AND SOL.[Year] = 2012
  AND SOL.[Month] BETWEEN 1 AND 3
WINDOW SalesByMonth AS (PARTITION BY SOL.ProductId, SOL.[Year], SOL.[Month])
, SalesByMonthSortedDESC AS (SalesByMonth ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty DESC)
, SalesByMonthSortedASC AS (SalesByMonth ORDER BY SOL.OrderQty ASC)
ORDER BY SOL.[Year]
, SOL.[Month]
, SOL.OrderQty DESC

Happy coding!