"An exact knowledge of conditions, and consequent timely application of praise or of constructive criticism, is one of the chief forces of the executive in securing satisfactory results. Undeserved criticism is unjust and destroys-initiative, while unmerited praise tends to render the executive ridiculous in the eyes of his subordinates; both are detrimental to discipline and weaken the power of the executive." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)
"It is desirable in all chart work to have certain conventions by which colors would be understood to have certain definite meanings. Thus, following railroad practice, red could generally be used in chart work to indicate dangerous or unfavorable conditions, and green to indicate commended features or favorable conditions. Where neither commendation nor adverse criticism is intended, colors such as blue, yellow, brown, etc., could be used." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)
"Under certain conditions, however, the ordinary form of graphic chart is slightly misleading. It will be conceded that its true function is to portray comparative fluctuations. This result is practically secured when the factors or quantities compared are nearly of the same value or volume, but analysis will show that this is not accomplished when the amounts compared differ greatly in value or volume. [...] The same criticism applies to charts which employ or more scales for various curve. If the different scale are in proper proportion, the result is the same as with one scale, but when two or more scales are used which are not proportional an indication may be given with respect to comparative fluctuations which is absolutely false." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)
"[…] it is not enough to say: 'There's error in the data and therefore the study must be terribly dubious'. A good critic and data analyst must do more: he or she must also show how the error in the measurement or the analysis affects the inferences made on the basis of that data and analysis." (Edward R Tufte, "Data Analysis for Politics and Policy", 1974)
"Just like the spoken or written word, statistics and graphs can lie. They can lie by not telling the full story. They can lead to wrong conclusions by omitting some of the important facts. [...] Always look at statistics with a critical eye, and you will not be the victim of misleading information." (Dyno Lowenstein, "Graphs", 1976)
"Changing measures are a particularly common problem with comparisons over time, but measures also can cause problems of their own. [...] We cannot talk about change without making comparisons over time. We cannot avoid such comparisons, nor should we want to. However, there are several basic problems that can affect statistics about change. It is important to consider the problems posed by changing - and sometimes unchanging - measures, and it is also important to recognize the limits of predictions. Claims about change deserve critical inspection; we need to ask ourselves whether apples are being compared to apples - or to very different objects." (Joel Best, "Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists", 2001)
"Graphical illustrations should be simple and pleasing to the eye, but the presentation must remain scientific. In other words, we want to avoid those graphical features that are purely decorative while keeping a critical eye open for opportunities to enhance the scientific inference we expect from the reader. A good graphical design should maximize the proportion of the ink used for communicating scientific information in the overall display." (Phillip I Good & James W Hardin, "Common Errors in Statistics" (and How to Avoid Them)", 2003)
"Criticism expands knowledge by revealing otherwise hidden meanings. The so-called 'positive' method examines a maker’s intent and rationale; a work’s structure is scrutinized and the factors that inform it are contextualized, providing the basis for balanced analysis and historical categorization. Conversely, the so-called 'negative' method is a kind of fault-finding exposé of flaws in a process or result. The purpose is ostensibly to reinforce a set of standards used to judge success or failure. Both methods are useful in addressing the form and function of design." (Steven Heller, Writing and Research for Graphic Designers: A Designer's Manual to Strategic Communication and Presentation", 2012)
"There is no reason why criticism has to follow set paths. Analysis of the designed world can, and should, take visual forms." (Steven Heller, "Writing and Research for Graphic Designers: A Designer's Manual to Strategic Communication and Presentation", 2012)
"A data story starts out like any other story, with a beginning and a middle. However, the end should never be a fixed event, but rather a set of options or questions to trigger an action from the audience. Never forget that the goal of data storytelling is to encourage and energize critical thinking for business decisions." (James Richardson, 2017)
"Just because there’s a number on it, it doesn’t mean that the number was arrived at properly. […] There are a host of errors and biases that can enter into the collection process, and these can lead millions of people to draw the wrong conclusions. Although most of us won’t ever participate in the collection process, thinking about it, critically, is easy to learn and within the reach of all of us." (Daniel J Levitin, "Weaponized Lies", 2017)
