💎🏭SQL Reloaded: Microsoft Fabric's SQL Databases (Part X: Templates for Database Objects)

One of the new features remarked in SQL databases when working on the previous post is the availability of templates in SQL databases. The functionality is useful even if is kept to a minimum. Probably, more value can be obtained when used in combination with Copilot, which requires at least a F12 capacity.

Schemas

Schemas are used to create a logical grouping of objects such as tables, stored procedures, and functions. From a structural and security point of view it makes sense to create additional schemas to manage the various database objects and use the default dbo schema only occasionally (e.g. for global created objects).

-- generated template - schema
CREATE SCHEMA SchemaName

-- create schema
CREATE SCHEMA Test

One can look at the sys.schemas to retrieve all the schemas available:

-- retrieve all schemas
SELECT schema_id
, name
, principal_id
FROM sys.schemas
ORDER BY schema_id

Tables

Tables, as database objects that contain all the data in a database are probably the elements that need the greatest attention in design and data processing. In some cases a table can be dedenormalized and it can store all the data needed, much like in MS Excel, respectively, benormalized in fact and dimension tables. 

Tables can be created explicitly by defining in advance their structure (see Option 1), respectively on the fly (see Option 2). 

-- Option 1

-- create the table manually (alternative to precedent step
CREATE TABLE [Test].[Customers](
	[CustomerId] [int] NOT NULL,
	[AddressID] [int] NULL,
	[Title] [nvarchar](8) NULL,
	[FirstName] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[LastName] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[CompanyName] [nvarchar](128) NULL,
	[SalesPerson] [nvarchar](256) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO

-- insert records
INSERT INTO Test.Customers
SELECT CustomerId
, Title
, FirstName 
, LastName
, CompanyName
, SalesPerson
FROM SalesLT.Customer


-- checking the output (both scenarios)
SELECT top 100 *
FROM Test.Customers

One can look at the sys.tables to retrieve all the tables available:

-- retrieve all tables
SELECT schema_name(schema_id) schema_name
, object_id
, name
FROM sys.tables
ORDER BY schema_name
, name

Views

Views are much like virtual table based on the result-set of an SQL statement that combines data from one or multiple tables.  They can be used to encapsulate logic, respectively project horizontally or  vertically a subset of the data. 

-- create view
CREATE OR ALTER VIEW Test.vCustomers
-- Customers 
AS
SELECT CST.CustomerId 
, CST.Title
, CST.FirstName 
, IsNull(CST.MiddleName, '') MiddleName
, CST.LastName 
, CST.CompanyName 
, CST.SalesPerson 
FROM SalesLT.Customer CST

-- test the view 
SELECT *
FROM Test.vCustomers
WHERE CompanyName = 'A Bike Store'

One can look at the sys.views to retrieve all the views available:

-- retrieve all views
SELECT schema_name(schema_id) schema_name
, object_id
, name
FROM sys.views
ORDER BY schema_name
, name

User-Defined Functions

A user-defined function (UDF) allows to create a function by using a SQL expression. It can be used alone or as part of a query, as in the below example.

-- generated template - user defined function
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionName] (
    @param1 INT,
    @param2 INT
)
RETURNS INT AS BEGIN RETURN
    @param1 + @param2
END

-- user-defined function: 
CREATE OR ALTER FUNCTION Test.GetFirstMiddleLastName (
    @FirstName nvarchar(50),
    @MiddleName nvarchar(50),
    @LastName nvarchar(50)
)
RETURNS nvarchar(150) AS 
BEGIN 
   RETURN IsNull(@FirstName, '') + IsNull(' ' + @MiddleName, '') + IsNull(' ' + @LastName, '') 
END

-- test UDF on single values
SELECT Test.GetFirstMiddleLastName ('Jack', NULL, 'Sparrow')
SELECT Test.GetFirstMiddleLastName ('Jack', 'L.', 'Sparrow')

-- test UDF on a whole table
SELECT TOP 100 Test.GetFirstMiddleLastName (FirstName, MiddleName, LastName)
FROM SalesLT.Customer

One can look at the sys.objects to retrieve all the scalar functions available:

-- retrieve all scalar functions
SELECT schema_name(schema_id) schema_name
, name
, object_id
FROM sys.objects 
WHERE type_desc = 'SQL_SCALAR_FUNCTION'
ORDER BY schema_name
, name

However, UDFs prove to be useful when they mix the capabilities of functions with the ones of views allowing to create a "parametrized view" (see next example) or even encapsulate a multi-line statement that returns a dataset. Currently, there seems to be no template available for creating such functions.

-- table-valued function
CREATE OR ALTER FUNCTION Test.tvfGetCustomers (
    @CompanyName nvarchar(50) NULL
)
RETURNS TABLE
-- Customers by Company
AS
RETURN (
	SELECT CST.CustomerId 
	, CST.CompanyName
	, CST.Title
	, IsNull(CST.FirstName, '') + IsNull(' ' + CST.MiddleName, '') + IsNull(' ' + CST.LastName, '') FullName
	, CST.FirstName 
	, CST.MiddleName 
	, CST.LastName 
	FROM SalesLT.Customer CST
	WHERE CST.CompanyName = IsNull(@CompanyName, CST.CompanyName)
);

-- test function for values
SELECT *
FROM Test.tvfGetCustomers ('A Bike Store')
ORDER BY CompanyName
, FullName

-- test function for retrieving all values
SELECT *
FROM Test.tvfGetCustomers (NULL)
ORDER BY CompanyName
, FullName

One can look at the sys.objects to retrieve all the table-valued functions available:

-- retrieve all table-valued functions
SELECT schema_name(schema_id) schema_name
, name
, object_id
FROM sys.objects 
WHERE type_desc = 'SQL_INLINE_TABLE_VALUED_FUNCTION'
ORDER BY schema_name
, name

Stored Procedures

A stored procedure is a prepared SQL statement that is stored as a database object and precompiled. Typically, the statements considered in SQL functions can be created also as stored procedure, however the latter doesn't allow to reuse the output directly.

-- get customers by company
CREATE OR ALTER PROCEDURE Test.spGetCustomersByCompany (
    @CompanyName nvarchar(50) NULL
)
AS
BEGIN
	SELECT CST.CustomerId 
	, CST.CompanyName
	, CST.Title
	, IsNull(CST.FirstName, '') + IsNull(' ' + CST.MiddleName, '') + IsNull(' ' + CST.LastName, '') FullName
	, CST.FirstName 
	, CST.MiddleName 
	, CST.LastName 
	FROM SalesLT.Customer CST
	WHERE CST.CompanyName = IsNull(@CompanyName, CST.CompanyName)
	ORDER BY CST.CompanyName
	, FullName
END 

-- test the procedure 
EXEC Test.spGetCustomersByCompany NULL -- all customers
EXEC Test.spGetCustomersByCompany 'A Bike Store' -- individual customer

One can look at the sys.objects to retrieve all the stored procedures available:

-- retrieve all scalar functions
SELECT schema_name(schema_id) schema_name
, name
, object_id
FROM sys.objects 
WHERE type_desc = 'SQL_STORED_PROCEDURE'
ORDER BY schema_name
, name

In the end, don't forget to drop the objects created above (note the order of the dependencies):

-- drop function 
DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS Test.GetFirstMiddleLastName

-- drop function 
DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS Test.tvfGetCustomers 
-- drop precedure
DROP VIEW IF EXISTS Test.Test.spGetCustomersByCompany

-- drop view 
DROP VIEW IF EXISTS Test.vCustomers

-- drop schema
DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS Test

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

References:
[1] Microsoft Learn (2024) Microsoft Fabric: Overview of Copilot in Fabric [link]

💎🏭SQL Reloaded: Microsoft Fabric's SQL Databases (Part IX: From OLTP to OLAP Data Models)

With SQL databases Microsoft brought OLTP to Microsoft Fabric which allows addressing a wider range of requirements, though this involves also some challenges that usually are addressed by the transition from the OLTP to OLAP architectures. Typically, there's an abstraction layer that is built on top of the OLTP data models that allows to address the various OLAP requirements. As soon as OLTP and OLAP models are mixed together, this opens the door to design and data quality issues that have impact on the adoption of solutions by users. Probably, those who worked with MS Access or even MS Excel directly or in combination with SQL Server can still remember the issues they run into.

Ideally, it should be a separation layer between OLTP and the OLAP data. This can be easily achieved in SQL databases by using two different schemas that mimic the interaction between the two types of architectures. So, supposing that the dbo schema from the SalesLT is the data as maintain by the OLTP layer, one can add an additional schema Test in which the OLAP logic is modelled. This scenario is not ideal, though it allows to model the two aspects of the topic considered. The following steps are to be performed in the environment in which the SalesLT database was created. 

Independently in which layer one works, it's ideal to create a set of views that abstracts the logic and ideally simplifies the processing of data. So, in a first step it's recommended to abstract the data from the source by creating a set of views like the one below:

-- drop view (cleaning)
-- DROP VIEW IF EXISTS SalesLT.vCustomerLocations 

-- create view
CREATE VIEW SalesLT.vCustomerLocations
-- Customers with main office
AS
SELECT CST.CustomerId 
, CSA.AddressID
, CST.Title
, CST.FirstName 
, IsNull(CST.MiddleName, '') MiddleName
, CST.LastName 
, CST.CompanyName 
, CST.SalesPerson 
, IsNull(CSA.AddressType, '') AddressType
, IsNull(ADR.City, '') City
, IsNull(ADR.StateProvince, '') StateProvince
, IsNull(ADR.CountryRegion, '') CountryRegion
, IsNull(ADR.PostalCode, '') PostalCode
FROM SalesLT.Customer CST
	 LEFT JOIN SalesLT.CustomerAddress CSA
	   ON CST.CustomerID = CSA.CustomerID
	  AND CSA.AddressType = 'Main Office'
	 	LEFT JOIN SalesLT.Address ADR
		  ON CSA.AddressID = ADR.AddressID

The view uses LEFT instead of FULL joins because this allows more flexibility, respectively identifying the gaps existing between entities (e.g. customers without addresses). In these abstractions, the number of transformations is kept to a minimum to reflect the data as reflected by the source. It may be chosen to minimize the occurrence of NULL values as this simplifies the logic for comparisons (see the use of IsNull).

Once the abstraction from the OLTP layer was built, one can make the data available in the OLAP layer:

-- create schema
CREATE SCHEMA Test

-- dropping the target table (for cleaning)
-- DROP TABLE IF EXISTS Test.CustomerLocations

-- Option 1
-- create the table on the fly
SELECT *
INTO Test.CustomerLocations
FROM SalesLT.vCustomerLocations

-- Option 2
-- create the table manually (alternative to precedent step
CREATE TABLE [Test].[CustomerLocations](
	[CustomerId] [int] NOT NULL,
	[AddressID] [int] NULL,
	[Title] [nvarchar](8) NULL,
	[FirstName] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[MiddleName] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[LastName] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[CompanyName] [nvarchar](128) NULL,
	[SalesPerson] [nvarchar](256) NULL,
	[AddressType] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[City] [nvarchar](30) NULL,
	[StateProvince] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[CountryRegion] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
	[PostalCode] [nvarchar](15) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO

-- insert records
INSERT INTO Test.CustomerLocations
SELECT *
FROM SalesLT.vCustomerLocations


-- checking the output (both scenarios)
SELECT top 100 *
FROM Test.CustomerLocations


-- drop the view (for cleaning)
-- DROP VIEW IF EXISTS Test.vCustomerLocations

-- create view
CREATE VIEW Test.vCustomerLocations
-- Customer locations
AS
SELECT CSL.CustomerId 
, CSL.AddressID
, CSL.Title
, CSL.FirstName 
, CSL.MiddleName 
, CSL.LastName 
, Concat(CSL.FirstName, ' ' + CSL.MiddleName, ' ', CSL.LastName) FullName
, CSL.CompanyName 
, CSL.SalesPerson 
, CSL.AddressType
, CSL.City
, CSL.StateProvince
, CSL.CountryRegion 
, CSL.PostalCode
FROM Test.CustomerLocations CSL

-- test the view
SELECT top 100 *
FROM Test.vCustomerLocations

Further on, one can create additional objects as required. Usually, a set of well-designed views is enough, offering the needed flexibility with a minimum of code duplication. In addition, one can build stored procedures and table-valued functions as needed:

-- drop the function (for cleaning)
-- DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS Test.tvfGetCustomerAddresses

-- generated template - function
CREATE FUNCTION Test.tvfGetCustomerAddresses (
    @CountryRegion nvarchar(50) NULL,
    @StateProvince nvarchar(50) NULL
)
RETURNS TABLE
-- Customers by Country & State province
AS
RETURN (
SELECT CSL.CustomerId 
, CSL.AddressID
, CSL.Title
, CSL.FirstName 
, CSL.MiddleName 
, CSL.LastName 
, CSL.FullName
, CSL.CompanyName 
, CSL.SalesPerson 
, CSL.AddressType 
, CSL.City
, CSL.StateProvince 
, CSL.CountryRegion 
, CSL.PostalCode
FROM Test.vCustomerLocations CSL
WHERE CSL.CountryRegion = IsNull(@CountryRegion, CSL.CountryRegion)
  AND CSL.StateProvince = IsNull(@StateProvince, CSL.StateProvince)
);

-- retrieving all records
SELECT *
FROM Test.tvfGetCustomerAddresses(NULL, NULL)

-- providing parameters
SELECT *
FROM Test.tvfGetCustomerAddresses('United States', 'Utah')

-- filtering on non-parametrized volumns
SELECT *
FROM Test.tvfGetCustomerAddresses('United States', 'Utah')
WHERE City = 'Salt Lake City'



-- drop the procedure (for cleaning)
-- DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS Test.spGetCustomerAddresses 

-- generated template - stored procedure
CREATE PROCEDURE Test.spGetCustomerAddresses (
    @CountryRegion nvarchar(50) NULL,
    @StateProvince nvarchar(50) NULL
)
-- Customers by Country & State province
AS
BEGIN
	SELECT CSL.CustomerId 
	, CSL.AddressID
	, CSL.Title
	, CSL.FirstName 
	, CSL.MiddleName 
	, CSL.LastName 
	, CSL.FullName
	, CSL.CompanyName 
	, CSL.SalesPerson 
	, CSL.AddressType 
	, CSL.City
	, CSL.StateProvince 
	, CSL.CountryRegion 
	, CSL.PostalCode
	FROM Test.vCustomerLocations CSL
	WHERE CSL.CountryRegion = IsNull(@CountryRegion, CSL.CountryRegion)
	AND CSL.StateProvince = IsNull(@StateProvince, CSL.StateProvince)
END 

-- retrieving all records
EXEC Test.spGetCustomerAddresses NULL, NULL

-- providing parameters
 EXEC Test.spGetCustomerAddresses 'United States', 'Utah'

These steps can repeated for each entity in scope.

This separation between OLTP and OLAP is usually necessary given that business processes need a certain amount of time until they are correctly reflected as per reporting needs. Otherwise, the gaps can negatively impact the quality of data used for reporting. For some reports these deviation might be acceptable, though there will be probably also (many) exceptions. Independently of the solution used, it's still needed to make sure that the data are appropriate for the processes and reporting. 

If no physical separation is needed between the two types of layers, one can remove the persisted tables from the logic and keep the objects as they are.

Independently of which architecture is chosen, one shouldn't forget to validate one's presumptions in what concerns the data model (e.g. customers without addresses, address types, etc.).

Previous Post <<||>> Next Post

🧊Data Warehousing: Architecture V (Dynamics 365, the Data Lakehouse and the Medallion Architecture)

Data Warehousing Series

An IT architecture is built and functions under a set of constraints that derive from architecture’s components. Usually, if we want flexibility or to change something in one area, this might have an impact in another area. This rule applies to the usage of the medallion architecture as well! 

In Data Warehousing the medallion architecture considers a multilayered approach in building a single source of truth, each layer denoting the quality of data stored in the lakehouse [1]. For the moment are defined 3 layers - bronze for raw data, silver for validated data, and gold for enriched data. The concept seems sound considering that a Data Lake contains all types of raw data of different quality that needs to be validated and prepared for reporting or other purposes.

On the other side there are systems like Dynamics 365 that synchronize the data in near-real-time to the Data Lake through various mechanisms at table and/or data entity level (think of data entities as views on top of other tables or views). The databases behind are relational and in theory the data should be of proper quality as needed by business.

The greatest benefit of serverless SQL pool is that it can be used to build near-real-time data analytics solutions on top of the files existing in the Data Lake and the mechanism is quite simple. On top of such files are built external tables in serverless SQL pool, tables that reflect the data model from the source systems. The external tables can be called as any other tables from the various database objects (views, stored procedures and table-valued functions). Thus, can be built an enterprise data model with dimensions, fact-like and mart-like entities on top of the synchronized filed from the Data Lake. The Data Lakehouse (= Data Warehouse + Data Lake) thus created can be used for (enterprise) reporting and other purposes.

As long as there are no special requirements for data processing (e.g. flattening hierarchies, complex data processing, high-performance, data cleaning) this approach allows to report the data from the data sources in near-real time (10-30 minutes), which can prove to be useful for operational and tactical reporting. Tapping into this model via standard Power BI and paginated reports is quite easy. 

Now, if it's to use the data medallion approach and rely on pipelines to process the data, unless one is able to process the data in near-real-time or something compared with it, a considerable delay will be introduced, delay that can span from a couple of hours to one day. It's also true that having the data prepared as needed by the reports can increase the performance considerably as compared to processing the logic at runtime. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. 

Probably, the most important scenario that needs to be handled is that of integrating the data from different sources. If unique mappings between values exist, unique references are available in one system to the records from the other system, respectively when a unique logic can be identified, the data integration can be handled in serverless SQL pool.

Unfortunately, when compared to on-premise or Azure SQL functionality, the serverless SQL pool has important constraints - it's not possible to use scalar UDFs, tables, recursive CTEs, etc. So, one needs to work around these limitations and in some cases use the Spark pool or pipelines. So, at least for exceptions and maybe for strategic reporting a medallion architecture can make sense and be used in parallel. However, imposing it on all the data can reduce flexibility!

Bottom line: consider the architecture against your requirements!

Previous Post <<||>>> Next Post

[1] What is the medallion lakehouse architecture?
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/databricks/lakehouse/medallion

💎SQL Reloaded: Alternatives for Better Code Maintainability in SQL Server & Azure Synapse I

Introduction

Queries can become quite complex and with the increased complexity they'll be harder to read and/or maintain. Since the early days of SQL Server, views and table-valued user-defined functions (UDFs) are the standard ways of encapsulating logic for reuse in queries, allowing to minimize the duplication of logic. Then came the common table expressions (CTEs), which allow a further layer of structuring the code, independently whether a view or UDF was used. 

These are the main 3 options that can be combined in various ways to better structure the code. On the other side, also a temporary table or table variable could be used for the same purpose, though they have further implications.

To exemplify the various approaches, let's consider a simple query based on two tables from the AdventureWorks database. For the sake of simplicity, further business rules have been left out.

Inline Subqueries

-- products with open purchase orders
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM Production.Product ITM
     JOIN ( -- cumulated open purchase orders by product
		SELECT POL.ProductId 
		, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
		FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
		WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
		GROUP BY POL.ProductId 
	) POL
	ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

As can be seen, the logic for the "Open purchase orders" result set is built within an inline subquery (aka inline view). As its logic becomes more complex, the simplest way to handle this is to move it into a CTE.

Common Table Expressions (CTEs)

A common table expression can be thought of as a temporary result set defined within the execution scope of a single SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE or CREATE VIEW statement [1]. Thus, the CTE can't be reused between queries.

The inline query is moved at the beginning within a WITH statement to which is given a proper name that allows easier identification later:

-- products with open purchase orders (common table expression)
WITH OpenPOs
AS (-- cumulated open purchase orders by product
	SELECT POL.ProductId 
	, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
	FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
	WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
	GROUP BY POL.ProductId 
)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM Production.Product ITM
     JOIN OpenPOs POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

Thus, this allows us to rewrite the JOIN as if it were between two tables. Multiple CTEs can be used as well, with or without any dependencies between them. Moreover, CTEs allow building recursive queries (see example).

There is no performance gain or loss by using a CTE. It's important to know that the result set is not cached, therefore, if the same CTE is called multiple times (within a query), it will be also "executed" for the same number of times. Except the cases in which the database engine uses a spool operator to save intermediate query results for a CTE, there will be created no work table in tempdb for CTEs.

If the inline query needs to be reused in several queries, defining a view is a better alternative.

Views

A view is a database object used to encapsulate a query and that can be referenced from other queries much like a table. In fact, it's also referred as a "virtual table". A view can't be execute by itself (as stored procedures do. No data, only the definition of the view is stored, and the various actions that can be performed on database objects can be performed on views as well.

-- creating the view
CREATE VIEW dbo.vOpenPurchaseOrders
AS
SELECT POL.ProductId 
, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
GROUP BY POL.ProductId 

-- testing the view
SELECT top 10 *
FROM dbo.vOpenPurchaseOrders

Once the view is created, it can be called from any query:

-- products with open purchase orders (table-valued function)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM Production.Product ITM
     JOIN dbo.vOpenPurchaseOrders POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

Besides the schema binding, there are no additional costs for using views. However, views have several limitations (see [2]). Moreover, it's not possible to use parameters with views, scenarios in which tabled-valued UDFs can help.

Indexed Views 

Starting with SQL Server 2015, it's possible to materialize the data in a view, storing the results of the view in a clustered index on the disk in same way a table with a clustered index is stored. This type of view is called an indexed view (aka materialized view, though the concept is used slightly different in Azure Synapse) and for long-running queries can provide considerable performance gains. In case the view contains a GROUP BY is present, its definition must contain COUNT_BIG(*) and must not contain HAVING.

-- dropping the view
--DROP VIEW IF EXISTS Purchasing.vOpenPOs

-- create view
CREATE VIEW Purchasing.vOpenPOs
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT POL.ProductId 
, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
, COUNT_BIG(*) Count
FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
GROUP BY POL.ProductId 
GO

--Create an index on the view.
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IDX_vOpenPOs
   ON Purchasing.vOpenPOs (ProductId);

--testing the view
SELECT top 100 *
FROM Purchasing.vOpenPOs

-- products with open purchase orders (indexed view)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM [Production].[Product] ITM
     JOIN Purchasing.vOpenPOs POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

When an indexed view is defined on a table, the query optimizer may use it to speed up the query execution even if it wasn't referenced in the query. Besides the restriction of the view to be deterministic, further limitations apply (see [6]).

Table-Valued Functions

A table-valued function is a user-defined function in which returns a table as a result, as opposed to a single data value, as scalar functions do.

Let's support that we need to restrict base the logic based on a time interval. We'd need then to provide the StartDate & EndDate as parameters. Compared with other UDFs table-valued functions, as their name implies, need to return a table:

-- creating the UDF function 
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.tvfOpenPurchaseOrdersByProduct( 
  @StartDate date 
, @EndDate date) 
RETURNS TABLE 
AS RETURN ( 
	SELECT POL.ProductId 
	, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
	FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
	WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
	  AND POL.DueDate BETWEEN @StartDate AND @EndDate
	GROUP BY POL.ProductId 
)

-- testing the UDF
SELECT top 10 *
FROM dbo.tvfOpenPurchaseOrdersByProduct('2014-01-01', '2014-12-31')

A table-valued function can be used as a "table with parameters" in JOINs:

-- products with open purchase orders (table-valued function)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM Production.Product ITM
     JOIN dbo.tvfOpenPurchaseOrdersByProduct('2014-01-01', '2014-12-31') POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

The parameters are optional, though in such cases using a view might still be a better idea. Table-valued functions used to have poor performance in the past compared with views and in certain scenarios they might still perform poorly. Their benefit resides in allowing to pass and use parameters in the logic, which can make them irreplaceable. Moreover, multi-statement table-valued functions can be built as well (see example)!

Notes:
1) When evaluating table-valued functions for usage consider their limitations as well (see [3])!
2) Scalar UDFs can be used to simplify the code as well, though they apply only to single values, therefore they are not considered in here!

Temporary Tables 

A temporary table is a base table that is stored and managed in tempdb as any other table. It exists only while the database session in which it was created is active. Therefore, it can be called multiple times, behaving much like a standard table:

-- create the temp table
CREATE TABLE dbo.#OpenPOs (
  ProductId int NOT NULL
, PurchQty decimal(8,2) NOT NULL
)

-- insert the cumulated purchase orders
INSERT INTO #OpenPOs
SELECT POL.ProductId 
, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
GROUP BY POL.ProductId 

-- products with open purchase orders (table-valued function)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM [Production].[Product] ITM
     JOIN dbo.#OpenPOs POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

-- drop the table (cleaning)
-- DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.#OpenPOs;

Being created in the tempdb, system database shared by several databases, temporary table's performance relies on tempdb's configuration and workload. Moreover, the concurrent creation of temporary tables from many sessions can lead to tempdb metadata contention, as each session attempts updating metadata information in the system based tables.

Temporary tables are logged, which adds more burden on the database engine, however being able to create indexes on them and use statistics can help processing result sets more efficiently, especially when called multiple times. 

Also, a temporary table might be cached (see [1]) and not deleted when its purpose ends, which allows operations that drop and create the objects to execute very quickly and reduces page allocation contention.

Table Variables

A table variable is a variable of type TABLE and can be used in functions, stored procedures, and batches. The construct is similar to the temp table and is stored as well in the tempdb and cached under certain scenarios, however they are scoped to the batch or routine in which they are defined and destroyed after that. 

-- create the table variable
DECLARE @OpenPOs TABLE (
  ProductId int NOT NULL
, PurchQty decimal(8,2) NOT NULL
)

-- insert the cumulated purchase orders
INSERT INTO @OpenPOs
SELECT POL.ProductId 
, SUM(POL.OrderQty) PurchQty
FROM Purchasing.PurchaseOrderDetail POL
WHERE OrderQty - (ReceivedQty - RejectedQty)>0
GROUP BY POL.ProductId 

-- products with open purchase orders (table variable)
SELECT ITM.ProductNumber
, ITM.Name
, POL.PurchQty
FROM [Production].[Product] ITM
     JOIN @OpenPOs POL
	   ON ITM.ProductId = POL.ProductId
ORDER BY ITM.ProductNumber

Table variables don’t participate in transactions or locking, while DML operations done on them are not logged. There are also no statistics maintained and any data changes impacting the table variable will not cause recompilation. Thus, they are usually faster than temporary variables, especially when their size is small, though their performance depends also on how they are used. On the other side, for big result sets and/or when several calls are involved, a temporary table could prove to be more efficient. 

Important!!! Temporary tables and table variables are means of improving the performance of long-running queries. Being able to move pieces of logic around helps in maintaining the code and it also provides a logical structure of the steps, however they shouldn't be used if the performance gain is not the target! Overusing them as technique can considerably decrease the performance of tempdb, which can have impact in other areas!

Azure Synapse

Moving to Azure Synapse there are several important limitations in what concerns the above (see [4]). Even if some features are supported, further limitations might apply. What's important to note is that materialized views act like indexed view in standard SQL Server and that CETAS (Create External Table as SELECT) are available to import/export data to the supported file formats in Hadoop, Azure storage blob or Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2.

Feature	Dedicated	Serverless	SQL Server
CTEs	Yes	Yes	Yes (2015+)
Recursive CTEs	No	No	Yes (2015+)
Views	Yes	Yes	Yes
Indexed views	No	No	Yes
Materialized views	Yes	No	No
Table-valued functions (single statement)	No	Yes	Yes
Table-valued functions (multi-statement)	No	No	Yes
Scalar UDFs	Yes	No	Yes
Tables	Yes	No	Yes
Temporary tables (local)	Yes	Limited	Yes
Temporary tables (global)	No	No	Yes
Table variables	Yes	Yes	Yes
CETAS	Yes	Limited	Yes (2022+)

Notes:
1) CETAS have two important limitations in serverless SQL Pool
    a) once the data were exported to a file, they can't be overwritten via the same syntax;
    b) logic based on temporary tables can't be exported via pipelines.
2) Temporary tables can be used to replace cursors (see example).

Previous Post  <<||>>  Next Post

Resources:
[1] Microsoft Learn (2012) Capacity Planning for tempdb (link)
[2] Microsoft Learn (2023) CREATE View (link)
[3] Microsoft Learn (2023) CREATE Function (link)
[4] Microsoft Learn (2023) Transact-SQL features supported in Azure Synapse SQL (link)
[5] Redgate (2018) Choosing Between Table Variables and Temporary Tables (ST011, ST012), by Phil Factor (link)
[6] Microsoft Learn (2023) Create indexed views (link)
[7] Microsoft Learn (2023) CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW AS SELECT (Transact-SQL) (link)
[8] Microsoft Learn (2023) CETAS with Synapse SQL (link)