"A model, like a novel, may resonate with nature, but it is not a ‘real’ thing. Like a novel, a model may be convincing - it may ‘ring true’ if it is consistent with our experience of the natural world. But just as we may wonder how much the characters in a novel are drawn from real life and how much is artifice, we might ask the same of a model: How much is based on observation and measurement of accessible phenomena, how much is convenience? Fundamentally, the reason for modeling is a lack of full access, either in time or space, to the phenomena of interest." (Kenneth Belitz, Science, Vol. 263, 1944)
"Consistency and completeness can also be characterized in terms of models: a theory T is consistent if and only if it has at least one model; it is complete if and only if every sentence of T which is satified in one model is also satisfied in any other model of T. Two theories T1 and T2 are said to be compatible if they have a common consistent extension; this is equivalent to saying that the union of T1 and T2 is consistent." (Alfred Tarski et al, "Undecidable Theories", 1953)
"To be useful data must be consistent - they must reflect periodic recordings of the value of the variable or at least possess logical internal connections. The definition of the variable under consideration cannot change during the period of measurement or enumeration. Also, if the data are to be valuable, they must be relevant to the question to be answered." (Cecil H Meyers, "Handbook of Basic Graphs: A modern approach", 1970)
"When evaluating a model, at least two broad standards are relevant. One is whether the model is consistent with the data. The other is whether the model is consistent with the ‘real world’." (Kenneth A Bollen, "Structural Equations with Latent Variables", 1989)
"The word theory, as used in the natural sciences, doesn’t mean an idea tentatively held for purposes of argument - that we call a hypothesis. Rather, a theory is a set of logically consistent abstract principles that explain a body of concrete facts. It is the logical connections among the principles and the facts that characterize a theory as truth. No one element of a theory [...] can be changed without creating a logical contradiction that invalidates the entire system. Thus, although it may not be possible to substantiate directly a particular principle in the theory, the principle is validated by the consistency of the entire logical structure." (Alan Cromer, "Uncommon Sense: The Heretical Nature of Science", 1993)
"For a given dataset there is not a great deal of advice which can be given on content and context. hose who know their own data should know best for their specific purposes. It is advisable to think hard about what should be shown and to check with others if the graphic makes the desired impression. Design should be let to designers, though some basic guidelines should be followed: consistency is important (sets of graphics should be in similar style and use equivalent scaling); proximity is helpful (place graphics on the same page, or on the facing page, of any text that refers to them); and layout should be checked (graphics should be neither too small nor too large and be attractively positioned relative to the whole page or display)."(Antony Unwin, "Good Graphics?" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)
"It is the consistency of the information that matters for a good story, not its completeness. Indeed, you will often find that knowing little makes it easier to fit everything you know into a coherent pattern." (Daniel Kahneman, "Thinking, Fast and Slow", 2011)
"Accuracy and coherence are related concepts pertaining to data quality. Accuracy refers to the comprehensiveness or extent of missing data, performance of error edits, and other quality assurance strategies. Coherence is the degree to which data - item value and meaning are consistent over time and are comparable to similar variables from other routinely used data sources." (Aileen Rothbard, "Quality Issues in the Use of Administrative Data Records", 2015)
"How good the data quality is can be looked at both subjectively and objectively. The subjective component is based on the experience and needs of the stakeholders and can differ by who is being asked to judge it. For example, the data managers may see the data quality as excellent, but consumers may disagree. One way to assess it is to construct a survey for stakeholders and ask them about their perception of the data via a questionnaire. The other component of data quality is objective. Measuring the percentage of missing data elements, the degree of consistency between records, how quickly data can be retrieved on request, and the percentage of incorrect matches on identifiers (same identifier, different social security number, gender, date of birth) are some examples." (Aileen Rothbard, "Quality Issues in the Use of Administrative Data Records", 2015)
"The danger of overfitting is particularly severe when the training data is not a perfect gold standard. Human class annotations are often subjective and inconsistent, leading boosting to amplify the noise at the expense of the signal. The best boosting algorithms will deal with overfitting though regularization. The goal will be to minimize the number of non-zero coefficients, and avoid large coefficients that place too much faith in any one classifier in the ensemble." (Steven S Skiena, "The Data Science Design Manual", 2017)
"There are other problems with Big Data. In any large data set, there are bound to be inconsistencies, misclassifications, missing data - in other words, errors, blunders, and possibly lies. These problems with individual items occur in any data set, but they are often hidden in a large mass of numbers even when these numbers are generated out of computer interactions." (David S Salsburg, "Errors, Blunders, and Lies: How to Tell the Difference", 2017)
No comments:
Post a Comment