"Deciding on which graphics to use is often a matter of taste. What one person thinks are good graphics for illustrating information may not appeal to someone else. It may also happen that different people interpret the same graphic in quite different ways. (Antony Unwin [in "Graphics of Large Datasets: Visualizing a Million"], 2006)
"Clearly principles and guidelines for good presentation graphics have a role to play in exploratory graphics, but personal taste and individual working style also play important roles. The same data may be presented in many alternative ways, and taste and customs differ as to what is regarded as a good presentation graphic. Nevertheless, there are principles that should be respected and guidelines that are generally worth following. No one should expect a perfect consensus where graphics are concerned." (Antony Unwin, "Good Graphics?" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)
"Data visualization [...] expresses the idea that it involves more than just representing data in a graphical form (instead of using a table). The information behind the data should also be revealed in a good display; the graphic should aid readers or viewers in seeing the structure in the data. The term data visualization is related to the new field of information visualization. This includes visualization of all kinds of information, not just of data, and is closely associated with research by computer scientists." (Antony Unwin et al, "Introduction" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)
"For a given dataset there is not a great deal of advice which can be given on content and context. hose who know their own data should know best for their specific purposes. It is advisable to think hard about what should be shown and to check with others if the graphic makes the desired impression. Design should be let to designers, though some basic guidelines should be followed: consistency is important (sets of graphics should be in similar style and use equivalent scaling); proximity is helpful (place graphics on the same page, or on the facing page, of any text that refers to them); and layout should be checked (graphics should be neither too small nor too large and be attractively positioned relative to the whole page or display)." (Antony Unwin, "Good Graphics?" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)
"There are two main reasons for using graphic displays of datasets: either to present or to explore data. Presenting data involves deciding what information you want to convey and drawing a display appropriate for the content and for the intended audience. [...] Exploring data is a much more individual matter, using graphics to find information and to generate ideas.Many displays may be drawn. They can be changed at will or discarded and new versions prepared, so generally no one plot is especially important, and they all have a short life span." (Antony Unwin, "Good Graphics?" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)
"Eye-catching data graphics tend to use designs that are unique (or nearly so) without being strongly focused on the data being displayed. In the world of Infovis, design goals can be pursued at the expense of statistical goals. In contrast, default statistical graphics are to a large extent determined by the structure of the data (line plots for time series, histograms for univariate data, scatterplots for bivariate nontime-series data, and so forth), with various conventions such as putting predictors on the horizontal axis and outcomes on the vertical axis. Most statistical graphs look like other graphs, and statisticians often think this is a good thing." (Andrew Gelman & Antony Unwin, "Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Looks" , Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics Vol. 22(1), 2013)
"Providing the right comparisons is important, numbers on their own make little sense, and graphics should enable readers to make up their own minds on any conclusions drawn, and possibly see more. On the Infovis side, computer scientists and designers are interested in grabbing the readers' attention and telling them a story. When they use data in a visualization (and data-based graphics are only a subset of the field of Infovis), they provide more contextual information and make more effort to awaken the readers' interest. We might argue that the statistical approach concentrates on what can be got out of the available data and the Infovis approach uses the data to draw attention to wider issues. Both approaches have their value, and it would probably be best if both could be combined." (Andrew Gelman & Antony Unwin, "Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Looks" , Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics Vol. 22(1), 2013)
"Statisticians tend to use standard graphic forms (e.g., scatterplots and time series), which enable the experienced reader to quickly absorb lots of information but may leave other readers cold. We personally prefer repeated use of simple graphical forms, which we hope draw attention to the data rather than to the form of the display." (Andrew Gelman & Antony Unwin, "Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Looks" , Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics Vol. 22(1), 2013)
"[…] we do see a tension between the goal of statistical communication and the more general goal of communicating the qualitative sense of a dataset. But graphic design is not on one side or another of this divide. Rather, design is involved at all stages, especially when several graphics are combined to contribute to the overall picture, something we would like to see more of." (Andrew Gelman & Antony Unwin, "Tradeoffs in Information Graphics", Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2013)
"Yes, it can sometimes be possible for a graph to be both beautiful and informative […]. But such synergy is not always possible, and we believe that an approach to data graphics that focuses on celebrating such wonderful examples can mislead people by obscuring the tradeoffs between the goals of visual appeal to outsiders and statistical communication to experts." (Andrew Gelman & Antony Unwin, "Tradeoffs in Information Graphics", Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2013)
No comments:
Post a Comment