"Summarization of statistical data into tabular form is an art rather than a routine following a set of formal rules. Tabulation inevitably implies a loss of detail. The original data are far too voluminous to be appreciated and understood; the significant details are mixed up with much that is irrelevant. The art of tabulation lies in the sacrifice of detail which is less significant for the purposes in hand so that what is really important can be emphasized. Tabulation implies classification, the grouping of items into classes according to various characteristics. And classification depends on clear and precise definitions." (Roy D G Allen, "Statistics for Economists", 1951)
"Charts and graphs are a method of organizing information for a unique purpose. The purpose may be to inform, to persuade, to obtain a clear understanding of certain facts, or to focus information and attention on a particular problem. The information contained in charts and graphs must, obviously, be relevant to the purpose. For decision-making purposes, information must be focused clearly on the issue or issues requiring attention. The need is not simply for 'information', but for structured information, clearly presented and narrowed to fit a distinctive decision-making context. An advantage of having a 'formula' or 'model' appropriate to a given situation is that the formula indicates what kind of information is needed to obtain a solution or answer to a specific problem." (Cecil H Meyers, "Handbook of Basic Graphs: A modern approach", 1970)
"Quantitative techniques will be more likely to illuminate if the data analyst is guided in methodological choices by a substantive understanding of the problem he or she is trying to learn about. Good procedures in data analysis involve techniques that help to (a) answer the substantive questions at hand, (b) squeeze all the relevant information out of the data, and (c) learn something new about the world." (Edward R Tufte, "Data Analysis for Politics and Policy", 1974)
"The information on a plot should be relevant to the goals of the analysis. This means that in choosing graphical methods we should match the capabilities of the methods to our needs in the context of each application. [...] Scatter plots, with the views carefully selected as in draftsman's displays, casement displays, and multiwindow plots, are likely to be more informative. We must be careful, however, not to confuse what is relevant with what we expect or want to find. Often wholly unexpected phenomena constitute our most important findings." (John M Chambers et al, "Graphical Methods for Data Analysis", 1983)
"There are two kinds of misrepresentation. In one. the numerical data do not agree with the data in the graph, or certain relevant data are omitted. This kind of misleading presentation. while perhaps hard to determine, clearly is wrong and can be avoided. In the second kind of misrepresentation, the meaning of the data is different to the preparer and to the user." (Anker V Andersen, "Graphing Financial Information: How accountants can use graphs to communicate", 1983)
"Maps used as charts do not need fine cartographic detail. Their purpose is to express ideas, explain relationships, or store data for consultation. Keep your maps simple. Edit out irrelevant detail. Without distortion, try to present the facts as the main feature of your map, which should serve only as a springboard for the idea you're trying to put across." (Bruce Robertson, "How to Draw Charts & Diagrams", 1988)
"Visual displays rich with data are not only an appropriate and proper complement to human capabilities, but also such designs are frequently optimal. If the visual task is contrast, comparison, and choice - as so often it is - then the more relevant information within eyespan, the better. Vacant, low-density displays, the dreaded posterization of data spread over pages and pages, require viewers to rely on visual memory - a weak skill - to make a contrast, a comparison, a choice." (Edward R Tufte, "Envisioning Information", 1990)
"Often many tracings are shown together. Extraneous parts of the tracings must be eliminated and relevant tracings should be placed in a logical order. Repetitious labels should be eliminated and labels added that will fully clarify your information." (Mary H Briscoe, "Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A guide to better posters, presentations, and publications" 2nd ed., 1995)
"Areas surrounding data-lines may generate unintentional optical clutter. Strong frames produce melodramatic but content-diminishing visual effects. [...] A good way to assess a display for unintentional optical clutter is to ask 'Do the prominent visual effects convey relevant content?'" (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006)
"Evidence is evidence, whether words, numbers, images, din grams- still or moving. It is all information after all. For readers and viewers, the intellectual task remains constant regardless of the particular mode Of evidence: to understand and to reason about the materials at hand, and to appraise their quality, relevance. and integrity." (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006)"It is important to pay heed to the following detail: a disadvantage of logarithmic diagrams is that a graphical integration is not possible, i.e., the area under the curve (the integral) is of no relevance.
"A beautiful visualization has a clear goal, a message, or a particular perspective on the information that it is designed to convey. Access to this information should be as straightforward as possible, without sacrificing any necessary, relevant complexity. [...] Most importantly, beautiful visualizations reflect the qualities of the data that they represent, explicitly revealing properties and relationships inherent and implicit in the source data. As these properties and relationships become available to the reader, they bring new knowledge, insight, and enjoyment." (Noah Iliinsky, "On Beauty", [in "Beautiful Visualization"] 2010)
"[...] communicating with data is less often about telling a specific story and more like starting a guided conversation. It is a dialogue with the audience rather than a monologue. While some data presentations may share the linear approach of a traditional story, other data products (analytical tools, in particular) give audiences the flexibility for exploration. In our experience, the best data products combine a little of both: a clear sense of direction defined by the author with the ability for audiences to focus on the information that is most relevant to them. The attributes of the traditional story approach combined with the self-exploration approach leads to the guided safari analogy." (Zach Gemignani et al, "Data Fluency", 2014)
"Further develop the situation or problem by covering relevant background. Incorporate external context or comparison points. Give examples that illustrate the issue. Include data that demonstrates the problem. Articulate what will happen if no action is taken or no change is made. Discuss potential options for addressing the problem. Illustrate the benefits of your recommended solution." (Cole N Knaflic, "Storytelling with Data: A Data Visualization Guide for Business Professionals", 2015)
"A well-designed graph clearly shows you the relevant end points of a continuum. This is especially important if you’re documenting some actual or projected change in a quantity, and you want your readers to draw the right conclusions. […]"
"The relevance to data visualization is that we are always conveying a message to some extent, and in the case of associations between variables, that message is sometimes a step removed from the data itself. If you are making visualizations, be careful not to impose your own interpretation too much when showing associations. If you are reading them, don’t assume that the message accompanying the data is as sound and scientifically based as the data themselves." (Robert Grant, "Data Visualization: Charts, Maps and Interactive Graphics", 2019)
"If the data that go into the analysis are flawed, the specific technical details of the analysis don’t matter. One can obtain stupid results from bad data without any statistical trickery. And this is often how bullshit arguments are created, deliberately or otherwise. To catch this sort of bullshit, you don’t have to unpack the black box. All you have to do is think carefully about the data that went into the black box and the results that came out. Are the data unbiased, reasonable, and relevant to the problem at hand? Do the results pass basic plausibility checks? Do they support whatever conclusions are drawn?" (Carl T Bergstrom & Jevin D West, "Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World", 2020)
"What is the secret to getting people to use charts and dashboards? Personalization. Inserting the audience into the visualization, and making it especially meaningful and relevant to the user, never fails." (Steve Wexler, "The Big Picture: How to use data visualization to make better decisions - faster", 2021)
No comments:
Post a Comment