Disclaimer: This is work in progress intended to consolidate information from various sources for learning purposes. For the latest information please consult the documentation (see the links below)!
Last updated: 18-Apr-2024
Delta Table Structure |
[Delta Lake] delta table
- {definition} table that stores data as a directory of files in the delta lake (DL) and registers table metadata to the metastore within a catalog and schema [1]
- ⇐ represents a schema abstraction over data files that are stored in Delta format [2]
- for each table, the lakehouse stores
- a folder containing its Parquet data files
- a _delta_Log folder in which transaction details are logged in JSON format
- all Microsoft Fabric (MF) experiences generate and consume delta tables [10]
- provides interoperability and a unified product experience [10]
- some experiences can only write to delta tables, while others can read from it [10]
- ⇒ all data files for a table in a database are grouped under a common data path [12]
- {feature} support ACID transactions
- modifications made to a table are logged in its transaction log
- enforces serializable isolation for concurrent operations [2]
- the logged transactions can be used to retrieve the history of changes made [2]
- each transaction creates new Parquet files
- deleting a row, doesn't physically delete in the parquet file [9]
- {feature} [DL] Delete Vectors
- are read as part of the table and indicate which rows to ignore [9]
- make it faster to perform deletions because there's no need to re-write the existing parquet files [9]
- many deleted rows take more resources to read that file [9]
- {feature} support DML
- only tables created while the future is available will have all DML published [..]
- {feature} support data versioning
- multiple versions of each table row can be retrieved from the transaction log [2]
- {feature} support time travel
- {feature} support for batch and streaming data
- delta tables can be used as both sources and destinations for streaming data [2]
- {feature} support standard formats and interoperability
- via the Parquet format
- table consumption
- [lakehouse] SQL Endpoint
- provides a read-only experience [4]
- can be used to query only delta tables via T-SQL [4]
- other file formats can not be queried using the SQL endpoint [4]
- ⇐ the files need to be converted to the delta format [4]
- {limitation} doesn't support the full T-SQL surface area of a transactional data warehouse [4]
- [Spark] managed table
- the table definition in the metastore and the underlying data files are both managed by the Spark runtime for the Fabric lakehouse [4]
- [Spark] external table
- the relational table definition in the metastore is mapped to an alternative file storage location [4]
- the Parquet data files and JSON log files for the table are stored in the Files storage location [4]
- [Spark] allows greater control over the creation and management of delta tables [4]
- {operation} create (aka create delta table)
- defines the table in the metastore for the lakehouse
- its data is stored in the underlying Parquet files for the table
- the details of mapping the table definition in the metastore to the underlying files are abstracted [4]
- ⇐ internally, there is also a log file that keeps track of which parquet files, when combined, make up the data that is in the table [4]
- the log files are internal and cannot be used directly by other engines [4]
- ⇐ DF publishes automatically the right log files so that other engines can directly access the right parquet files [..]
- after every 10 transactions, a new log file (aka checkpoint) is created automatically and asynchronously [4]
- ⇐ the file is a summary of all the previous log files [4]
- when querying the table, the system needs to read the latest checkpoint and any log files that were created after*
- ⇐ instead of having to read 105,120 log files, 10 or less files will be read*
- the Delta Lake Logs are automatically so that other engines can directly access the right parquet files *
- [Apache Spark in a lakehouse] allows greater control of the creation and management of delta tables [4]
- via saving a dataframe
- {method}save a dataframe as a delta table [4]
- ⇐ the easiest way to create a delta table
- creates both the table schema definition in the metastore and the data files in delta format [4]
- {method} create the table definition [4]
- creates the table schema in the metastore without saving any data files [4]
- {method} save data in delta format without creating a table definition in the metastore [4]
- {scenario} persist the results of data transformations performed in Spark in a file format over which a table definition is overlayed later or processed directly by using the delta lake API [4]
- modifications made to the data through the delta lake API or in an external table that is subsequently created on the folder will be recorded in the transaction logs [4]
- {mode} overwrite
- replace the contents of an existing folder with the data in a dataframe [4]
- {mode} append
- adds rows from a dataframe to an existing folder [4]
- Fabric uses an automatic table discovery capability to create the corresponding table metadata in the metastore [4]
- via DeltaTableBuilder API
- enables to write Spark code to create a table based on specifications
- via Spark SQL
- [managed table] via CREATE TABLE <table_definition> USING DELTA
- [external table] via CREATE TABLE <table_name> USING DELTA LOCATION
- the schema of the table is determined by the Parquet files containing the data in the specified location
- {scenario} create a table definition
- that references data that has already been saved in delta format [4]
- based on a folder where data are ingested in the delta format [4]
- {operation} update (aka update delta table)
- {operation} delete (aka delete delta table)
- [managed table] deleting the table deletes the underlying files from the Tables storage location for the lakehouse [4]
- [external table] deleting a table from the lakehouse metastore does not delete the associated data files [4]
- performance and storage cost efficiency tend to degrade over time
- {reason} new data added to the table might skew the data [3]
- {reason} batch and streaming data ingestion rates might bring in many small files
- {reason} update and delete operations eventually create read overhead
- parquet files are immutable by design, so Delta tables adds new parquet files which the changeset, further amplifying the issues imposed by the first two items [3]
- {reason} no longer needed data files and log files available in the storage
- {recommendation} don’t allow special characters in column names (incl. spaces)
- {recommendation} make table and column names business-friendly
- {feature} table partitions
- {recommendation} use a partitioned folder structure wherever applicable
- helps to improve data manageability and query performance
- results in faster search for specific data entries thanks to partition pruning/elimination
- {best practice} partition data to align with the query patterns [15]
- it can dramatically speed up query performance, especially when combined with other performance optimizations [15]
- {command} MERGE
- allows updating a delta table with advanced conditions [3]
- from a source table, view or DataFrame [3]
- {limitation} the current algorithm in the open source distribution of Delta Lake isn't fully optimized for handling unmodified rows [3]
- [Microsoft Spark Delta] implemented a custom Low Shuffle Merge optimization
- unmodified rows are excluded from an expensive shuffling operation that is needed for updating matched rows [3]
- {command} OPTIMIZE
- consolidates multiple small Parquet files into large file [8]
- should be run whenever there are enough small files to justify running the compaction operation [6]
- {best practice} run optimization after loading large tables [8]
- benefits greatly from the ACID transactions supported [6]
- [Delta Lake] predicate filtering
- specify predicates to only compact a subset of your data [6]
- {scenario} running a compaction job on the same dataset daily [6]
- {command} VACUUM
- removes old files no longer referenced by a Delta table log [8]
- files need to be older than the retention threshold [8]
- the default file retention threshold is seven days [8]
- shorter retention period impacts Delta's time travel capabilities [8]
- {default} historical data can't be delete within the retention threshold [2]
- ⇐ that's to maintain the consistency in data [2]
- {best practice} set a retention interval to at least seven days [8]
- ⇐ because old snapshots and uncommitted files can still be in use by the concurrent table readers and writers [8]
- important to optimize storage cost [8]
- {warning} leaning up active files might lead to reader failures or even table corruption if the uncommitted files are removed [8]
- {issue} small files
- create large metadata transaction logs which cause planning time slowness [6]
- result from
- big repartition value [6]
- if the dataset is partitioned on a high-cardinality column or if there are deeply nested partitions, then more small files will be created [6]
- tables that are incrementally updated frequently [6]
- files of sizes above 128 MB, and optimally close to 1 GB, improve compression and data distribution across the cluster nodes [8]
- {feature} auto compaction
- combines small files within Delta table partitions to automatically reduce small file problems [7]
- occurs after a write to a table has succeeded and runs synchronously on the cluster that has performed the write [7]
- only compacts files that haven’t been compacted previously [7]
- only triggered for partitions or tables that have at least a certain number of small files [7]
- enabled at the table or session level [7]
- {feature}[Delta Lake 1.2] data skipping
- the engine takes advantage of minimum and maximum values metadata to provide faster queries
- ⇐ requires the respective metadata
- its effectiveness depends on data's layout [7]
- {feature} [Delta Lake 3.0] z-ordering (aka multi-dimensional clustering)
- technique to collocate related information in the same set of files [7]
- automatically used in data-skipping algorithms [7]
- dramatically reduces the amount of data to read [7]
- aims to produce evenly-balanced data files with respect to the number of tuples
- ⇐ but not necessarily data size on disk [7]
- ⇐ the two measures are most often correlated [7]
- ⇐ but there can be situations when that is not the case, leading to skew in optimize task times [7]
- via ZORDER BY clause
- applicable to columns with high cardinality commonly used in query predicates [7]
- multiple columns can be specified as a comma-separated list
- {warning} the effectiveness of the locality drops with each extra column [7]
- {warning} using columns that do not have statistics collected on them is ineffective and wastes resources [7]
- statistics collection can be configured on certain columns by reordering columns in the schema, or by increasing the number of columns to collect statistics on [7]
- {characteristic} not idempotent
- every time is executed, it will try to create a new clustering of data in all files in a partition [7]
- it includes new and existing files that were part of previous Z-Ordering [7]
- {feature} checkpointing
- allows read queries to quickly reconstruct the current state of the table without reading too many files having incremental updates [7]
- {default} each checkpoint is written as a single Parquet file [7]
- {alternative} [Delta Lake 2.0] multi-part checkpointing
- allows splitting the checkpoint into multiple Parquet files [7]
- ⇒ parallelizes and speeds up writing the checkpoint [7]
- {feature} [Delta Lake 3.0] log compaction
- reduces the need for frequent checkpoints and minimize the latency spikes caused by them [7]
- allows new log compaction files with the format <x>.<y>.compact.json
- the files contain the aggregated actions for commit range [x, y]
- read support is enabled by default [7]
- write support not available yet [7]
- will be added in a future version of Delta [7]
- {feature} Delta Lake transaction log (aka DeltaLog)
- a sequential record of every transaction performed on a table since its creation [15]
- central to DL functionality because it is at the core of its important features [15]
- incl. ACID transactions, scalable metadata handling, time travel
- {goal} enable multiple readers and writers to operate on a given version of a dataset file simultaneously [15]
- {goal} provide additional information, to the execution engine for more performant operations [15]
- e.g. data skipping indexes
- always shows the user a consistent view of the data
- ⇒ serves as a single source of truth
- for each write operation, the data file is always written first, and only when that operation succeeds, a transaction log file is added to the _delta_log folder
- ⇐ the transaction is only considered complete when the transaction log entry is written successfully [15]
- {feature} [Lakehouse] table maintenance
- manages efficiently delta tables and keeps them always ready for analytics [8]
- performs ad-hoc table maintenance using contextual right-click actions in a delta table within the Lakehouse explorer [8]
- applies bin-compaction, V-Order, and unreferenced old files cleanup [8]
- via Lakehouse >> Tables >> (select table) >>Maintenance >> (select options) >> Run now
- a Spark maintenance job is submitted for execution [8]
- uses the user identity and table privileges
- consumes Fabric capacity of the workspace/user that submitted the job
- {constraint} only one maintenance job on a table can be run at any time
- if there's a running job on the table, the new one is rejected [8]
- jobs on different tables can execute in parallel [8]
- running jobs are available in the Monitoring Hub
- see "TableMaintenance" text within the activity name column [8]
- {best practice} properly designing the table physical structure based on the ingestion frequency and expected read patterns is likely more important than running the optimization commands [3]
Acronyms:
MF - Microsoft Fabric
JSON - JavaScript Object Notation
ACID - atomicity, consistency, isolation, durability
API - Application Programming Interface
CRUD - create, read, update, and delete
DL - Delta lakeAPI - Application Programming Interface
CRUD - create, read, update, and delete
MF - Microsoft Fabric
JSON - JavaScript Object Notation
Resources:
[1] Microsoft Learn (2023) Data objects in the Databricks lakehouse (link)
[3] Microsoft Learn (2023) Delta Lake table optimization and V-Order (link)
[4] Microsoft Learn (2023) Work with Delta Lake tables in Microsoft
Fabric (link)
[5] Delta Lake (2023) Quickstart (link)
[6] Delta Lake (2023) Delta Lake Small File Compaction with OPTIMIZE
(link)
[7] Delta Lake (2023) Optimizations (link)
[8] Microsoft Learn (2023) Use table maintenance feature to manage delta tables in Fabric (link)
[9] Microsoft Fabric Updates Blog (2023) Announcing: Automatic Data Compaction for Fabric Warehouse, by Kevin Conan (link)
[10] Microsoft Learn (2023) Delta Lake table format interoperability (link)
[7] Delta Lake (2023) Optimizations (link)
[8] Microsoft Learn (2023) Use table maintenance feature to manage delta tables in Fabric (link)
[9] Microsoft Fabric Updates Blog (2023) Announcing: Automatic Data Compaction for Fabric Warehouse, by Kevin Conan (link)
[10] Microsoft Learn (2023) Delta Lake table format interoperability (link)
[11] Josep Aguilar-Saborit et al (2020) POLARIS: The Distributed SQL
Engine in Azure Synapse, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment PVLDB
13(12) (link)
[12] Josep Aguilar-Saborit et al (2024), Extending Polaris to Support Transactions (link)
[13] Michael Armbrust et al (2020) Delta Lake: High-Performance ACID Table Storage over Cloud Object Stores, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment13(12) (link)
[14] Jesús Camacho-Rodríguez et al (2023) LST-Bench: Benchmarking Log-Structured Tables in the Cloud, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data (2024), 2 (1) (link)
[12] Josep Aguilar-Saborit et al (2024), Extending Polaris to Support Transactions (link)
[13] Michael Armbrust et al (2020) Delta Lake: High-Performance ACID Table Storage over Cloud Object Stores, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment13(12) (link)
[14] Jesús Camacho-Rodríguez et al (2023) LST-Bench: Benchmarking Log-Structured Tables in the Cloud, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data (2024), 2 (1) (link)
[15] Bennie Haelen & Dan Davis (2024) Delta Lake: Up and Running
Modern Data Lakehouse Architectures with Delta Lake, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment