"When training a neural network, it is important to understand when to stop. […] If the same training patterns or examples are given to the neural network over and over, and the weights are adjusted to match the desired outputs, we are essentially telling the network to memorize the patterns, rather than to extract the essence of the relationships. What happens is that the neural network performs extremely well on the training data. However, when it is presented with patterns it hasn't seen before, it cannot generalize and does not perform well. What is the problem? It is called overtraining." (Joseph P Bigus,"Data Mining with Neural Networks: Solving business problems from application development to decision support", 1996)
[Over-fitting fallacy:] "The error of designing an over-complex trading strategy with too many parameters that performs well on the in-sample-data, but is actually no more than a close description of the past data. This is a problem often encountered in time-series analysis and modelling." (Kermit Zieg &Heinrich Weber, "The Complete Guide to Point-and-Figure Charting", 2003)
"A smaller model with fewer covariates has two advantages: it might give better predictions than a big model and it is more parsimonious (simpler). Generally, as you add more variables to a regression, the bias of the predictions decreases and the variance increases. Too few covariates yields high bias; this called underfitting. Too many covariates yields high variance; this called overfitting. Good predictions result from achieving a good balance between bias and variance. […] finding a good model involves trading of fit and complexity." (Larry A Wasserman, "All of Statistics: A concise course in statistical inference", 2004)
"Learning a complicated function that matches the training data closely but fails to recognize the underlying process that generates the data. As a result of overfitting, the model performs poor on new input. Overfitting occurs when the training patterns are sparse in input space and/or the trained networks are too complex." (Frank Padberg, "Counting the Hidden Defects in Software Documents", 2010)
"A forecaster should almost never ignore data, especially when she is studying rare events […]. Ignoring data is often a tip-off that the forecaster is overconfident, or is overfitting her model - that she is interested in showing off rather than trying to be accurate." (Nate Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't", 2012)
"A problem in data mining when random variations in data are misclassified as important patterns. Overfitting often occurs when the data set is too small to represent the real world." (Microsoft, "SQL Server 2012 Glossary", 2012)
"If you look too hard at a set of data, you will find something - but it might not generalize beyond the data you’re looking at. This is referred to as overfitting a dataset. Data mining techniques can be very powerful, and the need to detect and avoid overfitting is one of the most important concepts to grasp when applying data mining to real problems. The concept of overfitting and its avoidance permeates data science processes, algorithms, and evaluation methods." (Foster Provost & Tom Fawcett, "Data Science for Business", 2013)
"Overfitting occurs when a formula describes a set of data very closely, but does not lead to any sensible explanation for the behavior of the data and does not predict the behavior of comparable data sets. In the case of overfitting, the formula is said to describe the noise of the system rather than the characteristic behavior of the system. Overfitting occurs frequently with models that perform iterative approximations on training data, coming closer and closer to the training data set with each iteration. Neural networks are an example of a data modeling strategy that is prone to overfitting." (Jules H Berman, "Principles of Big Data: Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information", 2013)
"Briefly speaking, to solve a Machine Learning problem means you optimize a model to fit all the data from your training set, and then you use the model to predict the results you want. Therefore, evaluating a model need to see how well it can be used to predict the data out of the training set. Usually there are three types of the models: underfitting, fair and overfitting model [...]. If we want to predict a value, both (a) and (c) in this figure cannot work well. The underfitting model does not capture the structure of the problem at all, and we say it has high bias. The overfitting model tries to fit every sample in the training set and it did it, but we say it is of high variance. In other words, it fails to generalize new data." (Shudong Hao, "A Beginner’s Tutorial for Machine Learning Beginners", 2014)
"Neural networks can model very complex patterns and decision boundaries in the data and, as such, are very powerful. In fact, they are so powerful that they can even model the noise in the training data, which is something that definitely should be avoided. One way to avoid this overfitting is by using a validation set in a similar way as with decision trees.[...] Another scheme to prevent a neural network from overfitting is weight regularization, whereby the idea is to keep the weights small in absolute sense because otherwise they may be fitting the noise in the data. This is then implemented by adding a weight size term (e.g., Euclidean norm) to the objective function of the neural network." (Bart Baesens, "Analytics in a Big Data World: The Essential Guide to Data Science and Its Applications", 2014)
"Underfitting is when a model doesn’t take into account enough information to accurately model real life. For example, if we observed only two points on an exponential curve, we would probably assert that there is a linear relationship there. But there may not be a pattern, because there are only two points to reference. [...] It seems that the best way to mitigate underfitting a model is to give it more information, but this actually can be a problem as well. More data can mean more noise and more problems. Using too much data and too complex of a model will yield something that works for that particular data set and nothing else." (Matthew Kirk, "Thoughtful Machine Learning", 2015)
"Neural nets are typically over-parametrized, and hence are prone to overfitting. Originally early stopping was set up as the primary tuning parameter, and the stopping time was determined using a held-out set of validation data. In modern networks the regularization is tuned adaptively to avoid overfitting, and hence it is less of a problem." (Bradley Efron & Trevor Hastie, "Computer Age Statistical Inference: Algorithms, Evidence, and Data Science", 2016)
"The greater the uncertainty, the bigger the gap between what you can measure and what matters, the more you should watch out for overfitting - that is, the more you should prefer simplicity." (Brian Christian & Thomas L Griffiths, "Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions", 2016)
"When memorization happens, you may have the illusion that everything is working well because your machine learning algorithm seems to have fitted the in sample data so well. Instead, problems can quickly become evident when you start having it work with out-of-sample data and you notice that it produces errors in its predictions as well as errors that actually change a lot when you relearn from the same data with a slightly different approach. Overfitting occurs when your algorithm has learned too much from your data, up to the point of mapping curve shapes and rules that do not exist [...]. Any slight change in the procedure or in the training data produces erratic predictions." (John P Mueller & Luca Massaron, Machine Learning for Dummies, 2016)
"By far the greatest headache in machine learning is the problem of overfitting. This means that your results look great for the data you trained them on, but they don’t generalize to other data in the future. [...] The solution is to train on some of your data and assess performance on other data." (Field Cady, "The Data Science Handbook", 2017)
"Cross-validation means we split our data into test and training sets, and then train the model on the training set before testing it on the test set. Cross-validation prevents overfitting, which is when a model seems quite accurate but fails to actually predict future events well." (Russell Jurney, "Agile Data Science 2.0: Building Full-Stack Data Analytics Applications with Spark", 2017)
"Multilayer perceptrons share with polynomial classifiers one unpleasant property. Theoretically speaking, they are capable of modeling any decision surface, and this makes them prone to overfitting the training data." (Miroslav Kubat," An Introduction to Machine Learning" 2nd Ed., 2017)
"The main reason why pruning tends to improve classification performance on future examples is that the removal of low-level tests, which have poor statistical support, usually reduces the danger of overfitting. This, however, works only up to a certain point. If overdone, a very high extent of pruning can (in the extreme) result in the decision being replaced with a single leaf labeled with the majority class." (Miroslav Kubat," An Introduction to Machine Learning" 2nd Ed., 2017)
"From a typical training set, many alternative decision trees can be created. As a rule, smaller trees are to be preferred, their main advantages being interpretability, removal of irrelevant and redundant attributes, and lower danger of overfitting noisy training data." (Miroslav Kubat, "An Introduction to Machine Learning" 2nd Ed., 2017)
"High-bias models typically produce simpler models that do not overfit and in those cases the danger is that of underfitting. Models with low-bias are typically more complex and that complexity enables us to represent the training data in a more accurate way. The danger here is that the flexibility provided by higher complexity may end up representing not only a relationship in the data but also the noise. Another way of portraying the bias-variance trade-off is in terms of complexity v simplicity." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)
"If either bias or variance is high, the model can be very far off from reality. In general, there is a trade-off between bias and variance. The goal of any machine-learning algorithm is to achieve low bias and low variance such that it gives good prediction performance. In reality, because of so many other hidden parameters in the model, it is hard to calculate the real bias and variance error. Nevertheless, the bias and variance provide a measure to understand the behavior of the machine-learning algorithm so that the model model can be adjusted to provide good prediction performance." (Umesh R Hodeghatta & Umesha Nayak, "Business Analytics Using R: A Practical Approach", 2017)
"Overfitting and underfitting are two important factors that could impact the performance of machine-learning models. Overfitting occurs when the model performs well with training data and poorly with test data. Underfitting occurs when the model is so simple that it performs poorly with both training and test data. [...] When the model does not capture and fit the data, it results in poor performance. We call this underfitting. Underfitting is the result of a poor model that typically does not perform well for any data." (Umesh R Hodeghatta & Umesha Nayak, "Business Analytics Using R: A Practical Approach", 2017)
"Overfitting refers to the phenomenon where a model is highly fitted on a dataset. This generalization thus deprives the model from making highly accurate predictions about unseen data. [...] Underfitting is a phenomenon where the model is not trained with high precision on data at hand. The treatment of underfitting is subject to bias and variance. A model will have a high bias if both train and test errors are high [...] If a model has a high bias type underfitting, then the remedy can be to increase the model complexity, and if a model is suffering from high variance type underfitting, then the cure can be to bring in more data or otherwise make the model less complex." (Danish Haroon, "Python Machine Learning Case Studies", 2017)
"The danger of overfitting is particularly severe when the training data is not a perfect gold standard. Human class annotations are often subjective and inconsistent, leading boosting to amplify the noise at the expense of the signal. The best boosting algorithms will deal with overfitting though regularization. The goal will be to minimize the number of non-zero coefficients, and avoid large coefficients that place too much faith in any one classifier in the ensemble." (Steven S Skiena, "The Data Science Design Manual", 2017)
"The tension between bias and variance, simplicity and complexity, or underfitting and overfitting is an area in the data science and analytics process that can be closer to a craft than a fixed rule. The main challenge is that not only is each dataset different, but also there are data points that we have not yet seen at the moment of constructing the model. Instead, we are interested in building a strategy that enables us to tell something about data from the sample used in building the model." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)
"Variance is a prediction error due to different sets of training samples. Ideally, the error should not vary from one training sample to another sample, and the model should be stable enough to handle hidden variations between input and output variables. Normally this occurs with the overfitted model." (Umesh R Hodeghatta & Umesha Nayak, "Business Analytics Using R: A Practical Approach", 2017)
"Variance is error from sensitivity to fluctuations in the training set. If our training set contains sampling or measurement error, this noise introduces variance into the resulting model. [...] Errors of variance result in overfit models: their quest for accuracy causes them to mistake noise for signal, and they adjust so well to the training data that noise leads them astray. Models that do much better on testing data than training data are overfit." (Steven S Skiena, "The Data Science Design Manual", 2017)
"Even though a natural way of avoiding overfitting is to simply build smaller networks (with fewer units and parameters), it has often been observed that it is better to build large networks and then regularize them in order to avoid overfitting. This is because large networks retain the option of building a more complex model if it is truly warranted. At the same time, the regularization process can smooth out the random artifacts that are not supported by sufficient data. By using this approach, we are giving the model the choice to decide what complexity it needs, rather than making a rigid decision for the model up front (which might even underfit the data)." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)
"One of the most common problems that you will encounter when training deep neural networks will be overfitting. What can happen is that your network may, owing to its flexibility, learn patterns that are due to noise, errors, or simply wrong data. [...] The essence of overfitting is to have unknowingly extracted some of the residual variation (i.e., the noise) as if that variation represented the underlying model structure. The opposite is called underfitting - when the model cannot capture the structure of the data." (Umberto Michelucci, "Applied Deep Learning: A Case-Based Approach to Understanding Deep Neural Networks", 2018)
"The high generalization error in a neural network may be caused by several reasons. First, the data itself might have a lot of noise, in which case there is little one can do in order to improve accuracy. Second, neural networks are hard to train, and the large error might be caused by the poor convergence behavior of the algorithm. The error might also be caused by high bias, which is referred to as underfitting. Finally, overfitting (i.e., high variance) may cause a large part of the generalization error. In most cases, the error is a combination of more than one of these different factors." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)
"The trick is to walk the line between underfitting and overfitting. An underfit model has low variance, generally making the same predictions every time, but with extremely high bias, because the model deviates from the correct answer by a significant amount. Underfitting is symptomatic of not having enough data points, or not training a complex enough model. An overfit model, on the other hand, has memorized the training data and is completely accurate on data it has seen before, but varies widely on unseen data. Neither an overfit nor underfit model is generalizable - that is, able to make meaningful predictions on unseen data." (Benjamin Bengfort et al, "Applied Text Analysis with Python: Enabling Language-Aware Data Products with Machine Learning", 2018)
"Any fool can fit a statistical model, given the data and some software. The real challenge is to decide whether it actually fits the data adequately. It might be the best that can be obtained, but still not good enough to use." (Robert Grant, "Data Visualization: Charts, Maps and Interactive Graphics", 2019)
"The classifier accuracy would be extra ordinary when the test data and the training data are overlapping. But when the model is applied to a new data it will fail to show acceptable accuracy. This condition is called as overfitting." (Jesu V Nayahi J & Gokulakrishnan K, "Medical Image Classification", 2019)
"We over-fit when we go too far in adapting to local circumstances, in a worthy but misguided effort to be ‘unbiased’ and take into account all the available information. Usually we would applaud the aim of being unbiased, but this refinement means we have less data to work on, and so the reliability goes down. Over-fitting therefore leads to less bias but at a cost of more uncertainty or variation in the estimates, which is why protection against over-fitting is sometimes known as the bias/variance trade-off." (David Spiegelhalter, "The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data", 2019)
"Well, in statistics we develop models from a sample of data
and are trying to make inferences to a broader population. […] If you use a lot
of parameters to explain the data in hand (the sample), you may have captured
your particular dataset but completely miss the mark for the population as a
whole! This is known as 'overfitting'." (Therese M Donovan & Ruth M Mickey, "Bayesian
Statistics for Beginners: A Step-by-Step Approach", 2019)
"In machine learning, our data has biases as well as useful information for our task. The more exactly our machine learning model fits the data, the more it reflects these biases. This means that the predictions may be based on spurious relationships that incidentally occur in the training data." (Alex Thomas, "Natural Language Processing with Spark NLP", 2020)
"[...] with four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with
five I can make him wiggle his trunk." (John von Neymann) [attributed]
