Graphical Representation: Junk Charts (Just the Quotes)

"Nearly all those who produce graphics for mass publication are trained exclusively in the fine arts and have had little experience with the analysis of data. Such experiences are essential for achieving precision and grace in the presence of statistics. [...] Those who get ahead are those who beautified data, never mind statistical integrity." (Edward R Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information", 1983)

"The interior decoration of graphics generates a lot of ink that does not tell the viewer anything new. The purpose of decoration varies - to make the graphic appear more scientific and precise, to enliven the display, to give the designer an opportunity to exercise artistic skills. Regardless of its cause, it is all non-data-ink or redundant data-ink, and it is often chartjunk."  (Edward R Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information", 1983)

"Consider this unsavory exhibit at right – chockablock with cliché and stereotype, coarse humor, and a content-empty third dimension. [...] Credibility vanishes in clouds of chartjunk; who would trust a chart that looks like a video game?" (Edward R Tufte, "Envisioning Information", 1990) [on diamond charts] 

"Gray grids almost always work well and, with a delicate line, may promote more accurate data reading and reconstruction than a heavy grid. Dark grid lines are chartjunk. When a graphic serves as a look-up table (rare indeed), then a grid may help with reading and interpolation. But even then the grid should be muted relative to the data." (Edward R Tufte, "Envisioning Information", 1990)

"Lurking behind chartjunk is contempt both for information and for the audience. Chartjunk promoters imagine that numbers and details are boring, dull, and tedious, requiring ornament to enliven. Cosmetic decoration, which frequently distorts the data, will never salvage an underlying lack of content. If the numbers are boring, then you've got the wrong numbers." (Edward R Tufte, "Envisioning Information", 1990)

"A bar graph typically presents either averages or frequencies. It is relatively simple to present raw data (in the form of dot plots or box plots). Such plots provide much more information. and they are closer to the original data. If the bar graph categories are linked in some way - for example, doses of treatments - then a line graph will be much more informative. Very complicated bar graphs containing adjacent bars are very difficult to grasp. If the bar graph represents frequencies. and the abscissa values can be ordered, then a line graph will be much more informative and will have substantially reduced chart junk." (Gerald van Belle, "Statistical Rules of Thumb", 2002)

"Be aware that bar charts provide ample opportunities for chart junk. The space within the bars is enticingly empty and it is tempting to put images or textures in the background. Some designers even swap out the standard bars for graphics." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"It is tempting to make charts more engaging by introducing fancy graphics or three dimensions so they leap of f the page, but doing so obscures the real data and misleads people, intentionally or not." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"So what is the difference between a chart or graph and a visualization? […] a chart or graph is a clean and simple atomic piece; bar charts contain a short story about the data being presented. A visualization, on the other hand, seems to contain much more ʻchart junkʼ, with many sometimes complex graphics or several layers of charts and graphs. A visualization seems to be the super-set for all sorts of data-driven design." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"Graphs should not be mere decoration, to amuse the easily bored. A useful graph displays data accurately and coherently, and helps us understand the data. Chartjunk, in contrast, distracts, confuses, and annoys. Chartjunk may be well-intentioned, but it is misguided. It may also be a deliberate attempt to mystify." (Gary Smith, "Standard Deviations", 2014)

"Effective data scientists know that they are trying to convey accurate information in an easily understood way. We have never seen a pie chart that was an improvement over a simple table. Even worse, the creative addition of pictures, colors, shading, blots, and splotches may produce chartjunk that confuses the reader and strains the eyes." (Gary Smith & Jay Cordes, "The 9 Pitfalls of Data Science", 2019)