🖍️Amit Ray - Collected Quotes

"Artificial intelligence is defined as the branch of science and technology that is concerned with the study of software and hardware to provide machines the ability to learn insights from data and the environment, and the ability to adapt in changing situations with high precision, accuracy and speed." (Amit Ray, "Compassionate Artificial Intelligence", 2018)

"Artificial Intelligence is not just learning patterns from data, but understanding human emotions and its evolution from its depth and not just fulfilling the surface level human requirements, but sensitivity towards human pain, happiness, mistakes, sufferings and well-being of the society are the parts of the evolving new AI systems." (Amit Ray, "Compassionate Artificial Intelligence", 2018)

"Quantum Machine Learning is defined as the branch of science and technology that is concerned with the application of quantum mechanical phenomena such as superposition, entanglement and tunneling for designing software and hardware to provide machines the ability to learn insights and patterns from data and the environment, and the ability to adapt automatically to changing situations with high precision, accuracy and speed." (Amit Ray, "Quantum Computing Algorithms for Artificial Intelligence", 2018)

"Quantum machine learning promises to discover the optimal network topologies and hyperparameters automatically without human intervention. (Amit Ray, "Quantum Computing Algorithms for Artificial Intelligence", 2018)

"The beauty of quantum machine learning is that we do not need to depend on an algorithm like gradient descent or convex objective function. The objective function can be nonconvex or something else." (Amit Ray, "Quantum Computing Algorithms for Artificial Intelligence", 2018)

"You can't understand depth of science, unless you challenge the published scientific data." (Amit Ray)

🖍️Aleksander Molak - Collected Quotes

"An important concept in complexity science is emergence – a phenomenon in which we can observe certain properties at the system level that cannot be observed at its constituent parts’ level. This property is sometimes described as a system being more than the sum of its parts." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"Any time you run regression analysis on arbitrary real-world observational data, there’s a significant risk that there’s hidden confounding in your dataset and so causal conclusions from such analysis are likely to be (causally) biased." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"Expert knowledge is a term covering various types of knowledge that can help define or disambiguate causal relations between two or more variables. Depending on the context, expert knowledge might refer to knowledge from randomized controlled trials, laws of physics, a broad scope of experiences in a given area, and more." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"In statistical inference and machine learning, we often talk about estimates and estimators. Estimates are basically our best guesses regarding some quantities of interest given (finite) data. Estimators are computational devices or procedures that allow us to map between a given (finite) data sample and an estimate of interest." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"In summary, the relationship between different branches of contemporary machine learning and causality is nuanced. That said, most broadly adopted machine learning models operate on rung one, not having a causal world model." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"'Let the data speak'" is a catchy and powerful slogan, but [...] data itself is not always enough. It’s worth remembering that in many cases 'data cannot speak for themselves' and we might need more information than just observations to address some of our questions." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"Matching is a family of methods for estimating causal effects by matching similar observations (or units) in the treatment and non-treatment groups. The goal of matching is to make comparisons between similar units in order to achieve as precise an estimate of the true causal effect as possible." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"Multiple regression provides scientists and analysts with a tool to perform statistical control - a procedure to remove unwanted influence from certain variables in the model." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"Non-linear associations are also quantifiable. Even linear regression can be used to model some non-linear relationships. This is possible because linear regression has to be linear in parameters, not necessarily in the data. More complex relationships can be quantified using entropy-based metrics such as mutual information. Linear models can also handle interaction terms. We talk about interaction when the model’s output depends on a multiplicative relationship between two or more variables." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"The basic goal of causal inference is to estimate the causal effect of one set of variables on another. In most cases, to do it accurately, we need to know which variables we should control for. [...] to accurately control for confounders, we need to go beyond the realm of pure statistics and use the information about the data-generating process, which can be encoded as a (causal) graph. In this sense, the ability to translate between graphical and statistical properties is central to causal inference." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"The causal interpretation of linear regression only holds when there are no spurious relationships in your data. This is the case in two scenarios: when you control for a set of all necessary variables (sometimes this set can be empty) or when your data comes from a properly designed randomized experiment." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"The first level of creativity [for evaluating causal models] is to use the refutation tests [...] The second level of creativity is available when you have access to historical data coming from randomized experiments. You can compare your observational model with the experimental results and try to adjust your model accordingly. The third level of creativity is to evaluate your modeling approach on simulated data with known outcomes. [...] The fourth level of creativity is sensitivity analysis." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

"[...] the modularity assumption states that when we perform a (perfect) intervention on one variable in the system, the only structural change that takes place in this system is the removal of this variable’s incoming edges (which is equivalent to the modification of its structural equation) and the rest of the system remains structurally unchanged." (Aleksander Molak, "Causal Inference and Discovery in Python", 2023)

🖍️Manfred Drosg - Collected Quotes

"A histogram consists of the outline of bars of equal width and appropriate length next to each other. By connecting the frequency values at the position of the nominal values (the midpoints of the intervals) with straight lines, a frequency polygon is obtained. Attaching classes with frequency zero at either end makes the area (the integral) under the frequency polygon equal  to that under the histogram." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"A valid digit is not necessarily a significant digit. The significance of numbers is a result of its scientific context." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"[myth:] Accuracy is more important than precision. For single best estimates, be it a mean value or a single data value, this question does not arise because in that case there is no difference between accuracy and precision. (Think of a single shot aimed at a target.) Generally, it is good practice to balance precision and accuracy. The actual requirements will differ from case to case." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Any scientific data without (a stated) uncertainty is of no avail. Therefore the analysis and description of uncertainty are almost as important as those of the data value itself . It should be clear that the uncertainty itself also has an uncertainty – due to its nature as a scientific quantity – and so on. The uncertainty of an uncertainty is generally not determined." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"As uncertainties of scientific data values are nearly as important as the data values themselves, it is usually not acceptable that a best estimate is only accompanied by an estimated uncertainty. Therefore, only the size of nondominant uncertainties should be estimated. For estimating the size of a nondominant uncertainty we need to find its upper limit, i.e., we want to be as sure as possible that the uncertainty does not exceed a certain value." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Before best estimates are extracted from data sets by way of a regression analysis, the uncertainties of the individual data values must be determined.In this case care must be taken to recognize which uncertainty components are common to all the values, i.e., those that are correlated (systematic)." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Before discarding a data point one should investigate the possible reasons for this faulty data value." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Correlation analysis can help us find the size of the formal relation between two properties. An equidirectional variation is present if we observe high values of one variable together with high values of the other variable (or low ones combined with low ones). In this case there is a positive correlation. If high values are combined with low values and low values with high values, the variation is counterdirectional, and the correlation is negative." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"[myth:] Counting can be done without error. Usually, the counted number is an integer and therefore without (rounding) error. However, the best estimate of a scientifically relevant value obtained by counting will always have an error. These errors can be very small in cases of consecutive counting, in particular of regular events, e.g., when measuring frequencies." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Due to the theory that underlies uncertainties an infinite number of data values would be necessary to determine the true value of any quantity. In reality the number of available data values will be relatively small and thus this requirement can never be fully met; all one can get is the best estimate of the true value." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"For linear dependences the main information usually lies in the slope. It is obvious that those points that lie far apart have the strongest influence on the slope if all points have the same uncertainty. In this context we speak of the strong leverage of distant points; when determining the parameter “slope” these distant points carry more effective weight. Naturally, this weight is distinct from the “statistical” weight usually used in regression analysis." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"For some scientific data the true value cannot be given by a constant or some straightforward mathematical function but by a probability distribution or an expectation value. Such data are called probabilistic. Even so, their true value does not change with time or place, making them distinctly different from  most statistical data of everyday life." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"If there is an outlier there are two possibilities: The model is wrong– after all, a theory is the basis on which we decide whether a data point is an outlier (an unexpected value) or not. The value of the data point is wrong because of a failure of the apparatus or a human mistake. There is a third possibility, though: The data point might not be an actual  outlier, but part of a (legitimate) statistical fluctuation." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"In error analysis the so-called 'chi-squared' is a measure of the agreement between the uncorrelated internal and the external uncertainties of a measured functional relation. The simplest such relation would be time independence. Theory of the chi-squared requires that the uncertainties be normally distributed. Nevertheless, it was found that the test can be applied to most probability distributions encountered in practice." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"In many cases systematic errors are interpreted as the systematic difference between nature (which is being questioned by the experimenter in his experiment) and the model (which is used to describe nature). If the model used is not good enough, but the measurement result is interpreted using this model, the final result (the interpretation) will be wrong because it is biased, i.e., it has a systematic deviation (not uncertainty). If we do not use the best model (the best theory) available for the description of a certain phenomenon this procedure is just wrong. It has nothing to do with an uncertainty." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"In science we try to explain reality by using models (theories). This is necessary because reality itself is too complex. So we need to come up with a model for that aspect of reality we want to understand – usually with the help of mathematics. Of course, these models or theories can only be simplifications of that part of reality we are looking at. A model can never be a perfect description of reality, and there can never be a part of reality perfectly mirroring a model." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"It is also inevitable for any model or theory to have an uncertainty (a difference between model and reality). Such uncertainties apply both to the numerical parameters of the model and to the inadequacy of the model as well. Because it is much harder to get a grip on these types of uncertainties, they are disregarded, usually." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"It is important that uncertainty components that are independent of each other are added quadratically. This is also true for correlated uncertainty components, provided they are independent of each other, i.e., as long as there is no correlation between the components." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"It is important to pay heed to the following detail: a disadvantage of logarithmic diagrams is that a graphical integration is not possible, i.e., the area under the curve (the integral) is of no relevance." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"It is the aim of all data analysis that a result is given in form of the best estimate of the true value. Only in simple cases is it possible to use the data value itself as result and thus as best estimate." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"It is the nature of an uncertainty that it is not known and can never be known, whether the best estimate is greater or less than the true value." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Outliers or flyers are those data points in a set that do not quite fit within the rest of the data, that agree with the model in use. The uncertainty of such an outlier is seemingly too small. The discrepancy between outliers and the model should be subject to thorough examination and should be given much thought. Isolated data points, i.e., data points that are at some distance from the bulk of the data are not outliers if their values are in agreement with the model in use." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"[myth:] Random errors can always be determined by repeating measurements under identical conditions. […] this statement is true only for time-related random errors ." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"[myth:] Systematic errors can be determined inductively. It should be quite obvious that it is not possible to determine the scale error from the pattern of data values." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"The fact that the same uncertainty (e.g., scale uncertainty) is uncorrelated if we are dealing with only one measurement, but correlated (i.e., systematic) if we look at more than one measurement using the same instrument shows that both types of uncertainties are of the same nature. Of course, an uncertainty keeps its characteristics (e.g., Poisson distributed), independent of the fact whether it occurs only once or more often." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"To fulfill the requirements of the theory underlying uncertainties, variables with random uncertainties must be independent of each other and identically distributed. In the limiting case of an infinite number of such variables, these are called normally distributed. However, one usually speaks of normally distributed variables even if their number is finite." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

🖍️Jesús Rogel-Salazar - Collected Quotes

"[...] a data scientist role goes beyond the collection and reporting on data; it must involve looking at a business The role of a data scientist goes beyond the collection and reporting on data. application or process from multiple vantage points and determining what the main questions and follow-ups are, as well as recommending the most appropriate ways to employ the data at hand." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)

"High-bias models typically produce simpler models that do not overfit and in those cases the danger is that of underfitting. Models with low-bias are typically more complex and that complexity enables us to represent the training data in a more accurate way. The danger here is that the flexibility provided by higher complexity may end up representing not only a relationship in the data but also the noise. Another way of portraying the bias-variance trade-off is in terms of complexity v simplicity." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017) 

"In terms of characteristics, a data scientist has an inquisitive mind and is prepared to explore and ask questions, examine assumptions and analyse processes, test hypotheses and try out solutions and, based on evidence, communicate informed conclusions, recommendations and caveats to stakeholders and decision makers." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)

"Munging, or wrangling data is actually the most time-consuming task in the data science workflow. [...] Data preparation is key to the extraction of valuable insight and although some may prefer to concentrate only on the much more fun modelling part, the fact that you get to know your dataset inside out while munging it implies that any new or follow-up questions can probably be attained with less effort." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)

"The tension between bias and variance, simplicity and complexity, or underfitting and overfitting is an area in the data science and analytics process that can be closer to a craft than a fixed rule. The main challenge is that not only is each dataset different, but also there are data points that we have not yet seen at the moment of constructing the model. Instead, we are interested in building a strategy that enables us to tell something about data from the sample used in building the model." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)

"One important thing to bear in mind about the outputs of data science and analytics is that in the vast majority of cases they do not uncover hidden patterns or relationships as if by magic, and in the case of predictive analytics they do not tell us exactly what will happen in the future. Instead, they enable us to forecast what may come. In other words, once we have carried out some modelling there is still a lot of work to do to make sense out of the results obtained, taking into account the constraints and assumptions in the model, as well as considering what an acceptable level of reliability is in each scenario." (Jesús Rogel-Salazar, "Data Science and Analytics with Python", 2017)

🖍️Francis Galton - Collected Quotes

"A visual image is the most perfect form of mental representation wherever the shape, position, and relations of objects in space are concerned. It is of importance in every handicraft and profession where design is required." (Francis Galton, "Mental Imagery" [in "Inquiries into Human Faculty and Development"] 1883)

"The object of statistical science is to discover methods of condensing information concerning large groups of allied facts into brief and compendious expressions suitable for discussion. The possibility of doing this is based on the constancy and continuity with which objects of the same species are found to vary." (Sir Francis Galton, "Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, Statistical Methods", 1883) 

"It is always well to retain a clear geometric view of the facts when we are dealing with statistical problems, which abound with dangerous pitfalls, easily overlooked by the unwary, while they are cantering gaily along upon their arithmetic." (Sir Francis Galton, "Natural Inheritance", 1889)

"It is difficult to understand why statisticians commonly limit their inquiries to Averages, and do not revel in more comprehensive views. […] An Average is but a solitary fact, whereas if a single other fact be added to it, an entire Normal Scheme, which nearly corresponds to the observed one, starts potentially into existence. Some people hate the very name of statistics, but I find them full of beauty and interest. Whenever they are not brutalised, but delicately handled by the higher methods, and are warily interpreted, their power of dealing with complicated phenomena is extraordinary. They are the only tools by which an opening can be cut through the formidable thicket of difficulties that bars the path of those who pursue the Science of man." (Sir Francis Galton, "Natural Inheritance", 1889)

"It is difficult to understand why statisticians commonly limit their inquiries to Averages, and do not revel in more comprehensive views. Their souls seem as dull to the charm of variety as that of the native of one of our flat English counties, whose retrospect of Switzerland was that, if its mountains could be thrown into its lakes, two nuisances would be got rid of at once. An Average is but a solitary fact, whereas if a single other fact be added to it, an entire Normal Scheme, which nearly corresponds to the observed one, starts potentially into existence." (Sir Francis Galton, "Natural Inheritance", 1889)

"[Statistics] are the only tools by which an opening can be cut through the formidable thicket of difficulties that bars the path of those who pursue the Science of man." (Sir Francis Galton, "Natural Inheritance", 1889)

"Every statistician wants now and then to test the practical value of some theoretical process, it may be of smoothing, or of interpola- tion, or of obtaining a measure of variability, or of making some particular deduction or inference." (Francis Galton, Nature vol. 42, [letter] 1890)

"It is now beginning to be generally understood, even by merely practical statisticians, that there is truth in the theory that all variability is much the same kind." (Francis Galton, "Kinship and Correlation", North American Review Vol. 150 (11), 1890)

"Reflection soon made it clear to me that not only were the two new problems identical in principle with the old one of kinship which I had already solved, but that all three of them were no more than special cases of a much more general problem - namely, that of Correlation." (Francis Galton,"Kinship and Correlation", 1890) 

"It had appeared from observation, and it was fully confirmed by this theory, that such a thing existed as an 'Index of Correlation', that is to say, a fraction, now commonly written T, that connects with close approximation every value of the deviation on the part of the subject, with the average of all the associated deviations of the Relative [...]" (Francis Galton, "Memories of My Life", 1908)

"[Statistics are] the only tools by which an opening can be cut through the formidable thicket of difficulties that bars the path of those who pursue the Science of Man." (Sir Ronald Galton)

More quotes from the author at quotablemath.blogspot.com. 

🖍️Frederick Mosteller - Collected Quotes

"As usual we may make the errors of I) rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, II) accepting the null hypothesis when it is false. But there is a third kind of error which is of interest because the present test of significance is tied up closely with the idea of making a correct decision about which distribution function has slipped furthest to the right. We may make the error of III) correctly rejecting the null hypothesis for the wrong reason." (Frederick Mosteller, "A k-Sample Slippage Test for an Extreme Population", The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19, 1948)

"Errors of the third kind happen in conventional tests of differences of means, but they are usually not considered, although their existence is probably recognized. It seems to the author that there may be several reasons for this among which are 1) a preoccupation on the part of mathematical statisticians with the formal questions of acceptance and rejection of null hypotheses without adequate consideration of the implications of the error of the third kind for the practical experimenter, 2) the rarity with which an error of the third kind arises in the usual tests of significance." (Frederick Mosteller, "A k-Sample Slippage Test for an Extreme Population", The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19, 1948)

"For many purposes graphical accuracy is sufficient. The speed of graphical processes, and more especially the advantages of visual presentation in pointing out facts or clues which might otherwise be overlooked, make graphical analysis very valuable." (Frederick Mosteller & John W Tukey, "The Uses and Usefulness of Binomial Probability Paper?", Journal of the American Statistical Association 44, 1949)

"If significance tests are required for still larger samples, graphical accuracy is insufficient, and arithmetical methods are advised. A word to the wise is in order here, however. Almost never does it make sense to use exact binomial significance tests on such data - for the inevitable small deviations from the mathematical model of independence and constant split have piled up to such an extent that the binomial variability is deeply buried and unnoticeable. Graphical treatment of such large samples may still be worthwhile because it brings the results more vividly to the eye." (Frederick Mosteller & John W Tukey, "The Uses and Usefulness of Binomial Probability Paper?", Journal of the American Statistical Association 44, 1949)

"Scientific and technological advances have made the world we live in complex and hard to understand. […] Science itself shows the same growing complexity. We often hear that 'one man can no longer cover a broad enough field' and that 'there is too much narrow specialization'. And yet these complexities must be met - and resolved. At all levels, decisions must be made which involve consideration of more than a single field." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "The Education of a Scientific Generalist", Science 109,1949)

"Mathematical models for empirical phenomena aid the development of a science when a sufficient body of quantitative information has been accumulated. This accumulation can be used to point the direction in which models should be constructed and to test the adequacy of such models in their interim states. Models, in turn, frequently are useful in organizing and interpreting experimental data and in suggesting new directions for experimental research." (Robert R. Bush & Frederick Mosteller, "A Mathematical Model for Simple Learning", Psychological Review 58, 1951)

"Almost any sort of inquiry that is general and not particular involves both sampling and measurement […]. Further, both the measurement and the sampling will be imperfect in almost every case. We can define away either imperfection in certain cases. But the resulting appearance of perfection is usually only an illusion." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"Because representativeness is inherent in the sampling plan and not in the particular sample at hand, we can never make adequate use of sample results without some measure of how well the results of this particular sample are likely to agree with the results of other samples which the same sampling plan might have provided. The ability to assess stability fairly is as important as the ability to represent the population fairly. Modern sampling plans concentrate on both." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"By sampling we can learn only about collective properties of populations, not about properties of individuals. We can study the average height, the percentage who wear hats, or the variability in weight of college juniors [...]. The population we study may be small or large, but there must be a population - and what we are studying must be a population characteristic. By sampling, we cannot study individuals as particular entities with unique idiosyncrasies; we can study regularities (including typical variabilities as well as typical levels) in a population as exemplified by the individuals in the sample." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"In many cases general probability samples can be thought of in terms of (1) a subdivision of the population into strata, (2) a self-weighting probability sample in each stratum, and (3) combination of the stratum sample means weighted by the size of the stratum." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"That which can be and should be representative is the sampling plan, which includes the manner in which the sample was drawn (essentially a specification of what other samples might have been drawn and what the relative chances of selection were for any two possible samples) and how it is to be analyzed. [...] It is clear that many [...] groups fail to be represented in any particular sample, yet this is not a criticism of that sample. Representation is not, and should not be, by groups. It is, and should be, by individuals as members of the sampled population. Representation is not, and should not be, in any particular sample. It is, and should be, in the sampling plan." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"The main purpose of a significance test is to inhibit the natural enthusiasm of the investigator." (Frederick Mosteller, "Selected Quantitative Techniques", 1954)

"We must emphasize that such terms as 'select at random', 'choose at random', and the like, always mean that some mechanical device, such as coins, cards, dice, or tables of random numbers, is used." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"We have made the sampling plan representative, not by giving each individual an equal chance to enter the sample and then weighting them equally, but by a more noticeable process of compensation, where those individuals very likely to enter the sample are weighted less, while those unlikely to enter are weighted more when they do appear. The net result is to give each individual an equal chance of affecting the (weighted) sample mean." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"We realize that if someone just 'grabs a handful', the individuals in the handful almost always resemble one another (on the average) more than do the members of a simple random sample. Even if the 'grabs' [sampling] are randomly spread around so that every individual has an equal chance of entering the sample, there are difficulties. Since the individuals of grab samples resemble one another more than do individuals of random samples, it follows (by a simple mathematical argument) that the means of grab samples resemble one another less than the means of random samples of the same size. From a grab sample, therefore, we tend to underestimate the variability in the population, although we should have to overestimate it in order to obtain valid estimates of variability of grab sample means by substituting such an estimate into the formula for the variability of means of simple random samples. Thus using simple random sample formulas for grab sample means introduces a double bias, both parts of which lead to an unwarranted appearance of higher stability." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"Weighing a sample appropriately is no more fudging the data than is correcting a gas volume for barometric pressure." (Frederick Mosteller et al, "Principles of Sampling", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 49 (265), 1954)

"A primary goal of any learning model is to predict correctly the learning curve - proportions of correct responses versus trials. Almost any sensible model with two or three free parameters, however, can closely fit the curve, and so other criteria must be invoked when one is comparing several models." (Robert R Bush & Frederick Mosteller, "A Comparison of Eight Models?", Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory, 1959)

"A satisfactory prediction of the sequential properties of learning data from a single experiment is by no means a final test of a model. Numerous other criteria - and some more demanding - can be specified. For example, a model with specific numerical parameter values should be invariant to changes in independent variables that explicitly enter in the model." (Robert R Bush & Frederick Mosteller,"A Comparison of Eight Models?", Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory, 1959)

"In the testing of a scientific model or theory, one rarely has a general measure of goodness-of-fit, a universal yardstick by which one accepts or rejects the model. Indeed, science does not and should not work this way; a theory is kept until a better one is found. One way that science does work is by comparing two or more theories to determine their relative merits in handling relevant data."(Robert R Bush & Frederick Mosteller, "A Comparison of Eight Models?", Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory, 1959)

"In a problem, the great thing is the challenge. A problem can be challenging for many reasons: because the subject matter is intriguing, because the answer defies unsophisticated intuition, because it illustrates an important principle, because of its vast generality, because of its difficulty, because of a clever solution, or even because of the simplicity or beauty of the answer." (Frederick Mosteller, "Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions", 1965)

"Using data from the population as it stands is a dangerous substitute for testing." (Frederick Mosteller & Gale Mosteller, "New Statistical Methods in Public Policy. Part I: Experimentation", Journal of Contemporary Business 8, 1979)

"Although we often hear that data speak for themselves, their voices can be soft and sly." (Frederick Mosteller, "Beginning Statistics with Data Analysis", 1983)

"The law of truly large numbers states: With a large enough sample, any outrageous thing is likely to happen." (Frederick Mosteller, "Methods for Studying Coincidences", Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 84, 1989)

"It is easy to lie with statistics, but easier to lie without them [...]" (Frederick Mosteller)

🖍️Leo Breiman - Collected Quotes

"Probability theory has a right and a left hand. On the right is the rigorous foundational work using the tools of measure theory. The left hand 'thinks probabilistically', reduces problems to gambling situations, coin-tossing, motions of a physical particle." (Leo Breiman, "Probability", 1992) 

"Approaching problems by looking for a data model imposes an a priori straight jacket that restricts the ability of statisticians to deal with a wide range of statistical problems. The best available solution to a data problem might be a data model; then again it might be an algorithmic model. The data and the problem guide the solution. To solve a wider range of data problems, a larger set of tools is needed." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"Data modeling has given the statistics field many successes in analyzing data and getting information about the mechanisms producing the data. But there is also misuse leading to questionable conclusions about the underlying mechanism." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"One goal of statistics is to extract information from the data about the underlying mechanism producing the data. The greatest plus of data modeling is that it produces a simple and understandable picture of the relationship between the input variables and responses." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"Prediction is rarely perfect. There are usually many unmeasured variables whose effect is referred to as 'noise'. But the extent to which the model box emulates nature's box is a measure of how well our model can reproduce the natural phenomenon producing the data." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"The goals in statistics are to use data to predict and to get information about the underlying data mechanism. Nowhere is it written on a stone tablet what kind of model should be used to solve problems involving data. To make my position clear, I am not against data models per se. In some situations they are the most appropriate way to solve the problem. But the emphasis needs to be on the problem and on the data." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"The greatest plus of data modeling is that it produces a simple and understandable picture of the relationship between the input variables and responses [...] different models, all of them equally good, may give different pictures of the relation between the predictor and response variables [...] One reason for this multiplicity is that goodness-of-fit tests and other methods for checking fit give a yes–no answer. With the lack of power of these tests with data having more than a small number of dimensions, there will be a large number of models whose fit is acceptable. There is no way, among the yes–no methods for gauging fit, of determining which is the better model." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The two cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"The point of a model is to get useful information about the relation between the response and predictor variables. Interpretability is a way of getting information. But a model does not have to be simple to provide reliable information about the relation between predictor and response variables; neither does it have to be a data model." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"The roots of statistics, as in science, lie in working with data and checking theory against data." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

"There are two cultures in the use of statistical modeling to reach conclusions from data. One assumes that the data are generated by a given stochastic data model. The other uses algorithmic models and treats the data mechanism as unknown. The statistical community has been committed to the almost exclusive use of data models. This commitment has led to irrelevant theory, questionable conclusions, and has kept statisticians from working on a large range of interesting current problems. Algorithmic modeling, both in theory and practice, has developed rapidly in fields outside statistics. It can be used both on large complex data sets and as a more accurate and informative alternative to data modeling on smaller data sets. If our goal as a field is to use data to solve problems, then we need to move away from exclusive dependence on data models and adopt a more diverse set of tools." (Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures", Statistical Science 16(3), 2001)

🖍️Charu C Aggarwal - Collected Quotes

"A major advantage of probabilistic models is that they can be easily applied to virtually any data type (or mixed data type), as long as an appropriate generative model is available for each mixture component. [...] A downside of probabilistic models is that they try to fit the data to a particular kind of distribution, which may often not be appropriate for the underlying data. Furthermore, as the number of model parameters increases, over-fitting becomes more common. In such cases, the outliers may fit the underlying model of normal data. Many parametric models are also harder to interpret in terms of intensional knowledge, especially when the parameters of the model cannot be intuitively presented to an analyst in terms of underlying attributes. This can defeat one of the important purposes of anomaly detection, which is to provide diagnostic understanding of the abnormal data generative process." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Outlier Analysis", 2013)

"An attempt to use the wrong model for a given data set is likely to provide poor results. Therefore, the core principle of discovering outliers is based on assumptions about the structure of the normal patterns in a given data set. Clearly, the choice of the 'normal' model depends highly upon the analyst’s understanding of the natural data patterns in that particular domain." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Outlier Analysis", 2013)

"Dimensionality reduction and regression modeling are particularly hard to interpret in terms of original attributes, when the underlying data dimensionality is high. This is because the subspace embedding is defined as a linear combination of attributes with positive or negative coefficients. This cannot easily be intuitively interpreted in terms specific properties of the data attributes." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Outlier Analysis", 2013)

"Typically, most outlier detection algorithms use some quantified measure of the outlierness of a data point, such as the sparsity of the underlying region, nearest neighbor based distance, or the fit to the underlying data distribution. Every data point lies on a continuous spectrum from normal data to noise, and finally to anomalies [...] The separation of the different regions of this spectrum is often not precisely defined, and is chosen on an ad-hoc basis according to application-specific criteria. Furthermore, the separation between noise and anomalies is not pure, and many data points created by a noisy generative process may be deviant enough to be interpreted as anomalies on the basis of the outlier score. Thus, anomalies will typically have a much higher outlier score than noise, but this is not a distinguishing factor between the two as a matter of definition. Rather, it is the interest of the analyst, which regulates the distinction between noise and an anomaly." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Outlier Analysis", 2013) 

"Even though a natural way of avoiding overfitting is to simply build smaller networks (with fewer units and parameters), it has often been observed that it is better to build large networks and then regularize them in order to avoid overfitting. This is because large networks retain the option of building a more complex model if it is truly warranted. At the same time, the regularization process can smooth out the random artifacts that are not supported by sufficient data. By using this approach, we are giving the model the choice to decide what complexity it needs, rather than making a rigid decision for the model up front (which might even underfit the data)." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)

"Regularization is particularly important when the amount of available data is limited. A neat biological interpretation of regularization is that it corresponds to gradual forgetting, as a result of which 'less important' (i.e., noisy) patterns are removed. In general, it is often advisable to use more complex models with regularization rather than simpler models without regularization." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)

"The high generalization error in a neural network may be caused by several reasons. First, the data itself might have a lot of noise, in which case there is little one can do in order to improve accuracy. Second, neural networks are hard to train, and the large error might be caused by the poor convergence behavior of the algorithm. The error might also be caused by high bias, which is referred to as underfitting. Finally, overfitting (i.e., high variance) may cause a large part of the generalization error. In most cases, the error is a combination of more than one of these different factors." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)

"The idea behind deeper architectures is that they can better leverage repeated regularities in the data patterns in order to reduce the number of computational units and therefore generalize the learning even to areas of the data space where one does not have examples. Often these repeated regularities are learned by the neural network within the weights as the basis vectors of hierarchical features." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook", 2018)

"A key point is that an increased number of attributes relative to training points provides additional degrees of freedom to the optimization problem, as a result of which irrelevant solutions become more likely. Therefore, a natural solution is to add a penalty for using additional features." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Artificial Intelligence: A Textbook", 2021)

"In general, the more complex the data, the more the analyst has to make prior inferences of what is considered normal for modeling purposes." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Artificial Intelligence: A Textbook", 2021)

"The ability to go beyond human domain knowledge is usually achieved by inductive learning methods that are unfettered from the imperfections in the domain knowledge of deductive methods." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Artificial Intelligence: A Textbook", 2021)

"The Monte Carlo tree search method is naturally suited to non-deterministic settings such as card games or backgammon. Minimax trees are not well suited to non-deterministic settings because of the inability to predict the opponent’s moves while building the tree. On the other hand, Monte Carlo tree search is naturally suited to handling such settings, since the desirability of moves is always evaluated in an expected sense. The randomness in the game can be naturally combined with the randomness in move sampling in order to learn the expected outcomes from each choice of move." (Charu C Aggarwal, "Artificial Intelligence: A Textbook", 2021)