✒️John Gall - Collected Quotes

"A complex system can fail in an infinite number of ways." (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. The inverse proposition also appears to be true: A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be made to work. You have to start over, beginning with a working simple system." (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"A system represents someone's solution to a problem. The system doesn't solve the problem." (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"Loose systems last longer and function better." (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"Systems Are Seductive. They promise to do a hard job faster, better, and more easily than you could do it by yourself. But if you set up a system, you are likely to find your time and effort now being consumed in the care and feeding of the system itself. New problems are created by its very presence. Once set up, it won't go away, it grows and encroaches. It begins to do strange and wonderful things. Breaks down in ways you never thought possible. It kicks back, gets in the way, and opposes its own proper function. Your own perspective becomes distorted by being in the system. You become anxious and push on it to make it work. Eventually you come to believe that the misbegotten product it so grudgingly delivers is what you really wanted all the time. At that point encroachment has become complete. You have become absorbed. You are now a systems person." (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"The following four propositions, which appear to the author to be incapable of formal proof, are presented as Fundamental Postulates upon which the entire superstructure of General Systemantics [...] is based [...] (1) Everything is a system. (2) Everything is part of a larger system. (3) The universe is infinitely systematizable, both upward (larger systems) and downward (smaller systems) (4) All systems are infinitely complex. (The illusion of simplicity comes from focusing attention on one or a few variables.)" (John Gall, "General Systemantics: How systems work, and especially how they fail", 1975)

"The system always kicks back. - Systems get in the way - or, in slightly more elegant language: Systems tend to oppose their own proper functions. Systems tend to malfunction conspicuously just after their greatest triumph." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The underground text of systems lore", 1986)

"Alternating positive and negative feedback produces a special form of stability represented by endless oscillation between two polar states or conditions." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"[...] the System may be so thoroughly organized around the familiar response strategy that a new response would require extensive restructuring - something that Systems do with the greatest reluctance and difficulty." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"The function performed by a System is not operationally identical to the function of the same name performed by a person. In general, a function performed by a larger System is not operationally identical to the function of the same name as performed by a smaller System." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"Systems-people everywhere share certain attributes, but each specific System tends to attract people with specific sets of traits. […] Systems attract not only Systems-people who have qualities making for success within the System; they also attract individuals who possess specialized traits adapted to allow them to thrive at the expense of the System; i.e., persons who parasitize the System." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"We are accustomed to thinking that a System acts like a machine, and that if we only knew its mechanism, we could understand, even predict, its behavior. This is wrong. The correct orientation is:  - and if the machine is large and complex enough, it will act like a large System. We simply have our metaphors backwards." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"When a system is set up to accomplish some goal, a new entity has come into being - the system itself. No matter what the 'goal' of the system, it immediately begins to exhibit systems-behavior, that is, to act according to the general laws that govern the operation of all systems." (John Gall, "Systemantics: The Systems Bible", 2002)

"Almost by definition, one is rarely privileged to 'control' a disaster. Yet the activity somewhat loosely referred to by this term is a substantial portion of Management, perhaps the most important part. […] It is the business of a good Manager to ensure, by taking timely action in the real world, that scenarios of disaster remain securely in the realm of Fantasy." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"But the history of large systems demonstrates that, once the hurdle of stability has been cleared, a more subtle challenge appears. It is the challenge of remaining stable when the rules change. Machines, like organizations or organisms, that fail to meet this challenge find that their previous stability is no longer of any use. The responses that once were life-saving now just make things worse. What is needed now is the capacity to re-write the procedure manual on short notice, or even (most radical change of all) to change goals." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Clearly, total feedback is Not a Good Thing. Too much feedback can over- whelm the response channels, leading to paralysis and inaction. Even in a system designed to accept massive feedback (such as the human brain), if the system is required to accommodate to all incoming data, equilibrium will never be reached. The point of decision will be delayed indefinitely, and no action will be taken." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"[…] even though a System may function very poorly, it can still tend to Expand to Fill the Known Universe, and Positive Feedback only encourages that tendency." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Experts in the 'Problem' area proceed to elaborate its complexity. They design complex Systems to attack it. This approach guarantees failure, at least for all but the most pedestrian tasks. The problem is a Problem precisely because it is incorrectly conceptualized in the first place, and a large System for studying and attacking the Problem merely locks in the erroneous conceptualization into the minds of everyone concerned. What is required is not a large System, but a different approach. Trying to design a System in the hope that the System will somehow solve the Problem, rather than simply solving the Problem in the first place, is to present oneself with two problems in place of one." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"In point of fact, the System may be so thoroughly organized around the familiar response strategy that a new response would require extensive restructuring - something that Systems do with the greatest reluctance and difficulty." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Information Theory is a mathematical treatment of what is left after the meanings have been removed from a Communication." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Not only Nature, but Systems generally, cannot be wise when feedbacks are unduly delayed. Feedback is likely to cause trouble if it is either too slow or too prompt. It must be adjusted to the response rhythms of the system as well as to the tempo of the actual events - a double restriction." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Nothing is more useless than struggling against a Law of Nature. On the other hand, there are circumstances (highly unusual and narrowly defined, of course) when one’s knowledge of Systems-functions will provide precisely the measure of extra added ability needed to tip the scales of a doubtful operation in one’s favor." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Pragmatically, it is generally easier to aim at changing one or a few things at a time and then work out the unexpected effects, than to go to the opposite extreme. Attempting to correct everything in one grand design is appropriately designated as Grandiosity. […] A little Grandiosity goes a long way. […] The diagnosis of Grandiosity is quite elegantly and strictly made on a purely quantitative basis: How many features of the present System, and at what level, are to be corrected at once? If more than three, the plan is grandiose and will fail." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Striving for Perfection produces a kind of tunnel-vision resembling a hypnotic state. Absorbed in the pursuit of perfecting the System at hand, the striver has no energy or attention left over for considering other, possibly better, ways of doing the whole thing." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"Systems are never dealing with the real world that the rest of us have to live in, but instead with a filtered, distorted, and censored version which is all that can get past the sensory organs of the System itself." (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

"[…] the System has its effects on the people within it. It isolates them, feeds them a distorted and partial version of the outside world, and gives them the illusion of power and effectiveness."  (John Gall, "The Systems Bible: The Beginner's Guide to Systems Large and Small"[Systematics 3rd Ed.], 2011)

✒️Donella H Meadows - Collected Quotes

"Everything we think we know about the world is a model. Every word and every language is a model. All maps and statistics, books and databases, equations and computer programs are models. So are the ways I picture the world in my head - my mental models. None of these is or ever will be the real world. […] Our models usually have a strong congruence with the world. That is why we are such a successful species in the biosphere. Especially complex and sophisticated are the mental models we develop from direct, intimate experience of nature, people, and organizations immediately around us." (Donella H Meadows, "Limits to Growth", 1972)

"However, and conversely, our models fall far short of representing the world fully. That is why we make mistakes and why we are regularly surprised. In our heads, we can keep track of only a few variables at one time. We often draw illogical conclusions from accurate assumptions, or logical conclusions from inaccurate assumptions. Most of us, for instance, are surprised by the amount of growth an exponential process can generate. Few of us can intuit how to damp oscillations in a complex system." (Donella H Meadows, "Limits to Growth", 1972)

"Technology can relieve the symptoms of a problem without affecting the underlying causes. Faith in technology as the ultimate solution to all problems can thus divert our attention from the most fundamental problem - the problem of growth in a finite system - and prevent us from taking effective action to solve it." (Donella H Meadows, "The Limits to Growth", 1972)

"Models can easily become so complex that they are impenetrable, unexaminable, and virtually unalterable." (Donella H Meadows, "The unavoidable a priori", 1980)

"The world is a complex, interconnected, finite, ecological–social–psychological–economic system. We treat it as if it were not, as if it were divisible, separable, simple, and infinite. Our persistent, intractable global problems arise directly from this mismatch." (Donella H Meadows, "Whole Earth Models and System", 1982)

"A quantity growing exponentially toward a limit reaches that limit in a surprisingly short time." (Donella Meadows, "Thinking in systems: A Primer", 2008)

"A system is a set of things – people, cells, molecules, or whatever – interconnected in such a way that they produce their own pattern of behavior over time. […] The system, to a large extent, causes its own behavior." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008) 

"In fact, one of the most frustrating aspects of systems is that the purposes of subunits may add up to an overall behavior that no one wants." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)"

"In physical, exponentially growing systems, there must be at least one reinforcing loop driving growth and at least one balancing feedback loop constraining growth, because no system can grow forever in a finite environment." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)

"Like resilience, self-organizazion is often sacrificed for purposes of short-term productivity and stability." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)

"Our culture, obsessed with numbers, has given us the idea that what we can measure is more important than what we can't measure. Think about that for a minute. It means that we make quantity more important than quality." (Donella H Meadows, "Thinking in Systems: A Primer", 2008)

"[…] our mental models fail to take into account the complications of the real world - at least those ways that one can see from a systems perspective. It is a warning list. Here is where hidden snags lie. You can’t navigate well in an interconnected, feedback-dominated world unless you take your eyes off short-term events and look for long-term behavior and structure; unless you are aware of false boundaries and bounded rationality; unless you take into account limiting factors, nonlinearities and delays. You are likely to mistreat, misdesign, or misread systems if you don’t respect their properties of resilience, self-organization, and hierarchy." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)

"The bounded rationality of each actor in a system may not lead to decisions that further the welfare of the system as a whole." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)

"The world is nonlinear. Trying to make it linear for our mathematical or administrative convenience is not usually a good idea even when feasible, and it is rarely feasible." (Donella H Meadow, "Thinking in Systems: A Primer", 2008)

"When there are long delays in feedback loops, some sort of foresight is essential." (Donella H Meadows, “Thinking in Systems: A Primer”, 2008)

"You can’t navigate well in an interconnected, feedback-dominated world unless you take your eyes off short-term events and look for long term behavior and structure; unless you are aware of false boundaries and bounded rationality; unless you take into account limiting factors, nonlinearities and delays." (Donella H Meadow, "Thinking in Systems: A Primer", 2008)

✒️Paul Cilliers - Collected Quotes

"A neural network consists of large numbers of simple neurons that are richly interconnected. The weights associated with the connections between neurons determine the characteristics of the network. During a training period, the network adjusts the values of the interconnecting weights. The value of any specific weight has no significance; it is the patterns of weight values in the whole system that bear information. Since these patterns are complex, and are generated by the network itself (by means of a general learning strategy applicable to the whole network), there is no abstract procedure available to describe the process used by the network to solve the problem. There are only complex patterns of relationships." (Paul Cilliers, "Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"Each element in the system is ignorant of the behavior of the system as a whole, it responds only to information that is available to it locally. This point is vitally important. If each element ‘knew’ what was happening to the system as a whole, all of the complexity would have to be present in that element." (Paul Cilliers, "Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems" , 1998)

"Complex systems operate under conditions far from equilibrium. Complex systems need a constant flow of energy to change, evolve and survive as complex entities. Equilibrium, symmetry and complete stability mean death. Just as the flow, of energy is necessary to fight entropy and maintain the complex structure of the system, society can only survive as a process. It is defined not by its origins or its goals, but by what it is doing." (Paul Cilliers,"Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"From a more general philosophical perspective we can say that we wish to model complex systems because we want to understand them better.  The main requirement for our models accordingly shifts from having to be correct to being rich in information.  This does not mean that the relationship between the model and the system itself becomes less important, but the shift from control and prediction to understanding does have an effect on our approach to complexity: the evaluation of our models in terms of performance can be deferred. Once we have a better understanding of the dynamics of complexity, we can start looking for the similarities and differences between different complex systems and thereby develop a clearer understanding of the strengths and limitations of different models." (Paul Cilliers,"Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"Meaning is conferred not by a one-to-one correspondence of a symbol with some external concept or object, but by the relationships between the structural components of the system itself." (Paul Cilliers, "Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"Modelling techniques on powerful computers allow us to simulate the behaviour of complex systems without having to understand them.  We can do with technology what we cannot do with science.  […] The rise of powerful technology is not an unconditional blessing.  We have  to deal with what we do not understand, and that demands new  ways of thinking." (Paul Cilliers,"Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"The ability of neural networks to operate successfully on inputs that did not form part of the training set is one of their most important characteristics. Networks are capable of finding common elements in all the training examples belonging to the same class, and will then respond appropriately when these elements are encountered again. Optimising this capability is an important consideration when designing a network." (Paul Cilliers, "Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems", 1998)

"The concept ‘complexity’ is not univocal either. Firstly, it is useful to distinguish between the notions ‘complex’ and ‘complicated’. If a system- despite the fact that it may consist of a huge number of components - can be given a complete description in terms of its individual constituents, such a system is merely complicated. […] In a complex system, on the other hand, the interaction among constituents of the system, and the interaction between the system and its environment, are of such a nature that the system as a whole cannot be fully understood simply by analysing its components. Moreover, these relationships are not fixed, but shift and change, often as a result of self-organisation. This can result in novel features, usually referred to in terms of emergent properties." (Paul Cilliers, "Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems" , 1998)

"There is no over-arching theory of complexity that allows us to ignore the contingent aspects of complex systems. If something really is complex, it cannot by adequately described by means of a simple theory. Engaging with complexity entails engaging with specific complex systems. Despite this we can, at a very basic level, make general remarks concerning the conditions for complex behaviour and the dynamics of complex systems. Furthermore, I suggest that complex systems can be modelled." (Paul Cilliers," Complexity and Postmodernism", 1998)

✒️John M Bryson (Collected Quotes)

"A causal map is a word-and-arrow diagram in which ideas and actions are causally linked with one another through the use of arrows. The arrows indicate how one idea or action leads to another. Causal mapping makesit possible to articulate a large number of ideas and their interconnections in such a way that people can know what to do in an area of concern, how to do it and why, because the arrows indicate the causes and consequences of an idea or action. Causal mapping is therefore a technique for linking strategic thinking and acting, helping make sense of complex problems, and communicating to oneself and others what might be done about them." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"A statement of strategic aims is powerful when it represents the interaction between all of the goals [Strategy]: the goals are seen as a system where each goal helps deliver other high-level goals and may in turn be helped by the delivery of subordinate goals." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"Causal mapping is a simple and useful technique for addressing situations where thinking– as an individual or as a group–matters. A causal map is a word-and-arrow diagram in which ideas and actions are causally linked with one another through the use of arrows. The arrows indicate how one idea or action leads to another. Causal mapping makes it possible to articulate a large number of ideas and their interconnections in such a way that people can know what to do in an area of concern, how to do it and why, because the arrows indicate the causes and consequences of an idea or action." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"Causal mapping is [...] a technique for linking strategic thinking and acting, helping make sense of complex problems, and communicating to oneself and others what might be done about them. With practice, the use of causal mapping can assist you in moving from 'winging it' when thinking matters to a more concrete and rigorous approach that helps you and others achieve success in an easy and far more reliable way" (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"Causal mapping makes it possible to articulate a large number of ideas and their interconnections in such a way that we can better understand an area of concern. Causal mapping also helps us know what to do about the issue, what it would take to do those things, and what we would like to get out of having done so. Causal mapping is therefore a particularly powerful technique for making sense of complex problems, linking strategic thinking and acting, and helping to communicate to others what might or should be done. " (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"Linking focuses attention not on topics but on action: what results might be achieved by doing something, and what things needed to be done to make other things happen." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"Positive feedback loops are very important. Even when afeedback loop is made up of competencies, because they are self-sustaining they may be very important resources for the future of the business [Strategy]. A positive loop means that each of the competencies in the loop feeds all of the others. When the feedback loop is distinctive, this will be even more important because the distinctiveness is self-sustaining." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"The process of constructing a map thus allows you to reflect on your own thinking, or that of someone else. Mapping helps you become conscious of your reasoning and to understand clearly what another person is thinking. In turn, that consciousness and understanding can help you reaffirm what you think or else change your mind. Shared understanding and mutual agreement also become possible." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"When an individual uses causal mapping to help clarify their own thinking, we call this technique cognitive mapping, because it is related to personal thinking or cognition. When a group maps their own ideas, we call it oval mapping, because we often use oval-shaped cards to record individuals’ ideas so that they can be arranged into a group’s map. Cognitive maps and oval maps can be used to create a strategic plan, because the maps include goals, strategies and actions, just like strategic plans." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

"When people question assumptions, the map may clarify what they are. When logic is challenged, the map may help. When people want to know how goals and strategies are linked, the map may show how they are. The map does not make the decisions. Rather, it provides a record that preserves complexity, yet organizes and categorizes that complexity in such a way that people can understand and manage it. And if more mapping needs to be done, the map is there as a base on which to build." (John M Bryson et al, "Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping For Practical Business Results", 2004)

✒️Robert M Axelrod (Collected Quotes)

"A cognitive map has only two basic types of elements: concepts and causal beliefs. The concepts are treated as variables, and the causal beliefs are treated as relationships between the variables." (Robert M Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The cognitive maps of political elites", 1976)

"A cognitive map is a particular kind of mathematical model of a person's belief system; in actual practice, cognitive maps are derived from assertions of beliefs. [...] Like all mathematical models, a cognitive map can be useful in two quite distinct ways: as a normative model and as an empirical model. Interpreted as a normative model, a cognitive map makes no claims to reflect accurately how a person deduces new beliefs from old ones, how he makes decisions, and so on, but instead claims to show how he should do these things. Interpreted as an empirical model, a cognitive map claims to indicate how a person actually does perform certain cognitive operations, in the sense that the results of the various operations that are possible with the model do, in fact, correspond to the behavior of the per son who is being modeled." (Robert M Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The cognitive maps of political elites", 1976)

"A cognitive map is a specific way of representing a person's assertions about some limited domain, such as a policy problem. It is designed to capture the structure of the person's causal assertions and to generate the consequences that follow front this structure. […]  a person might use his cognitive map to derive explanations of the past, make predictions for the future, and choose policies in the present." (Robert M Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The cognitive maps of political elites", 1976)

"A cognitive map is designed to capture the structure of the causal assertions of a person with respect to a particular policy domain, and generate the consequences that follow from this structure." (Robert M Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The cognitive maps of political elites", 1976)

"A decision maker must simplify the manifest complexities of the external world. He must be able to construct a manageable representation of the external world so that he can describe and cope with his environment. The use of this representation for the purposes of making reasoned decisions requires some beliefs that link possible choices with potential outcomes." (Robert M Axelrod, "Decision for Neoimperialism: The Deliberations of the British Eastern Committee in 1918", 1976)

"A mathematical model is a tremendous simplification of what it represents. But it does not simplify everything about its object, or there would be nothing left to model. Instead, it simplifies everything that is not to be examined, and leaves in the model what is to be examined." (Robert M Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The cognitive maps of political elites", 1976)

"Cognitive mapping is one specific approach to belief systems. It focuses on causal beliefs and values and their structural relationships. Cognitive mapping is, therefore especially suitable to the study of the means-ends arguments people use when they try to evaluate the policy alternatives that they perceive are available to them." (Robert Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites", 1976)

"The concepts a person uses are represented as points, and the causal links between these concepts are represented as arrows between these points. This gives a pictorial representation of the causal assertions of a person as a graph of points and arrows. This kind of representation of assertions as a graph will be called a cognitive map. The policy alternatives, all of the various causes and effects, the goals, and the ultimate utility of the decision maker can all be thought of as concept variables, and represented as points in the cognitive map. The real power of this approach ap pears when a cognitive map is pictured in graph form; it is then relatively easy to see how each of the concepts and causal relation ships relate to each other, and to see the overall structure of the whole set of portrayed assertions." (Robert Axelrod, "The Cognitive Mapping Approach to Decision Making" [in "Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites"], 1976)

"What cognitive mapping offers is a systematic way to proceed in our search for understanding how others will act. Its real strength (especially as compared to other formal approaches to decision making) is that it is able to employ the concepts of the decision maker who is being predicted, rather than the concepts of the person who is doing the predicting." (Robert Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites", 1976)

"What difference does it make which cognitive map a person has on a policy issue? Why would we want to know about a person's cognitive map? There are two broad answers to these questions. The first is that we want to know about cognitive maps so that we can better understand the decision-making process. The second is that we want to know about cognitive maps so that we can improve the decision-making process." (Robert Axelrod, "Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites", 1976)

✒️Kenneth E Boulding - Collected Quotes

"Knowledge is not something which exists and grows in the abstract. It is a function of human organisms and of social organization. Knowledge, that is to say, is always what somebody knows: the most perfect transcript of knowledge in writing is not knowledge if nobody knows it. Knowledge however grows by the receipt of meaningful information - that is, by the intake of messages by a knower which are capable of reorganising his knowledge." (Kenneth E Boulding, "General Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science", Management Science Vol. 2 (3), 1956)

"One advantage of exhibiting a hierarchy of systems in this way is that it gives us some idea of the present gaps in both theoretical and empirical knowledge. Adequate theoretical models extend up to about the fourth level, and not much beyond. Empirical knowledge is deficient at practically all levels." (Kenneth E Boulding, "General Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science", 1956)

"It is important to realize that the exercise of any skill depends on the ability to create an abstract system of some kind out of the totality of the world around us." (Kenneth E Boulding, "The Skills of the Economist", 1958)

"The idea of knowledge as an improbable structure is still a good place to start. Knowledge, however, has a dimension which goes beyond that of mere information or improbability. This is a dimension of significance which is very hard to reduce to quantitative form. Two knowledge structures might be equally improbable but one might be much more significant than the other." (Kenneth E Boulding, "Beyond Economics: Essays on Society", 1968)

"It [knowledge] is clearly related to information, which we can now measure; and an economist especially is tempted to regard knowledge as a kind of capital structure, corresponding to information as an income flow. Knowledge, that is to say, is some kind of improbable structure or stock made up essentially of patterns - that is, improbable arrangements, and the more improbable the arrangements, we might suppose, the more knowledge there is." (Kenneth E Boulding, "Beyond Economics: Essays on Society", 1968)

"The human condition can almost be summed up in the observation that, whereas all experiences are of the past, all decisions are about the future. It is the great task of human knowledge to bridge this gap and to find those patterns in the past which can be projected into the future as realistic images." (Kenneth E Boulding, [foreword] 1972)

"We never like to admit to ourselves that we have made a mistake. Organizational structures tend to accentuate this source of failure of information." (Kenneth E Boulding, "Toward a General Social Science", 1974)

"Prediction of the future is possible only in systems that have stable parameters like celestial mechanics. The only reason why prediction is so successful in celestial mechanics is that the evolution of the solar system has ground to a halt in what is essentially a dynamic equilibrium with stable parameters. Evolutionary systems, however, by their very nature have unstable parameters. They are disequilibrium systems and in such systems our power of prediction, though not zero, is very limited because of the unpredictability of the parameters themselves. If, of course, it were possible to predict the change in the parameters, then there would be other parameters which were unchanged, but the search for ultimately stable parameters in evolutionary systems is futile, for they probably do not exist… Social systems have Heisenberg principles all over the place, for we cannot predict the future without changing it." (Kenneth E Boulding, "Evolutionary Economics", 1981)

✒️John L Casti - Collected Quotes

"[…] a complex system is incomprehensible unless we can simplify it by using alternative levels of description." (John L Casti, "On System Complexity: Identification, Measurement, and Management" [in "Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches"] 1986)

"Coping with complexity involves the creation of faithful models of not only the system to be managed. but also of the management system itself." (John L Casti, "On System Complexity: Identification, Measurement, and Management" [in "Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches"] 1986)

"[…] complexity emerges from simplicity when alternative descriptions of a system are not reducible to each other. For a given observer, the more such inequivalent descriptions he or she generates, the more complex the system appears. Conversely, a complex system can be simplified in one of two ways: reduce the number of potential descriptions (by restricting the observer's means of interaction with the system) and/or use a coarser notion of system equivalence, thus reducing the number of equivalence classes." (John L Casti, "On System Complexity: Identification, Measurement, and Management" [in "Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches"] 1986)

"Simple systems generally involve a small number of components. with self-interaction dominating the mutual interaction of the variables. […] Besides involving only a few variables. simple systems generally have very few feedback/feedforward loops. Such loops enable the system to restructure. or at least modify. the interaction pattern of its variables. thereby opening-up the possibility of a wider range of potential behavior patterns." (John L Casti, "On System Complexity: Identification, Measurement, and Management" [in "Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches"] 1986)

"[…] a model is a mathematical representation of the modeler's reality, a way of capturing some aspects of a particular reality within the framework of a mathematical apparatus that provides us with a means for exploring the properties of the reality mirrored in the model." (John L Casti, "Reality Rules: Picturing the world in mathematics", 1992)

"Basically, the point of making models is to be able to bring a measure of order to our experiences and observations, as well as to make specific predictions about certain aspects of the world we experience." (John L Casti, "Reality Rules: Picturing the world in mathematics", 1992)

"Reliable information processing requires the existence of a good code or language, i.e., a set of rules that generate information at a given hierarchical level, and then compress it for use at a higher cognitive level. To accomplish this, a language should strike an optimum balance between variety (stochasticity) and the ability to detect and correct errors (memory)."(John L Casti, "Reality Rules: Picturing the world in mathematics", 1992)

"Skewness is a measure of symmetry. For example, it's zero for the bell-shaped normal curve, which is perfectly symmetric about its mean. Kurtosis is a measure of the peakedness, or fat-tailedness, of a distribution. Thus, it measures the likelihood of extreme values." (John L Casti, "Reality Rules: Picturing the world in mathematics", 1992)

"[…] the complexity of a given system is always determined relative to another system with which the given system interacts. Only in extremely special cases, where one of these reciprocal interactions is so much weaker than the other that it can be ignored, can we justify the traditional attitude regarding complexity as an intrinsic property of the system itself." (John L Casti, "Reality Rules: Picturing the world in mathematics", 1992)

"The core of a decision problem is always to find a single method that can be applied to each question, and that will always give the correct answer for each individual problem." (John L Casti, "Mathematical Mountaintops: The Five Most Famous Problems of All Time", 2001)

"[…] according to the bell-shaped curve the likelihood of a very-large-deviation event (a major outlier) located in the striped region appears to be very unlikely, essentially zero. The same event, though, is several thousand times more likely if it comes from a set of events obeying a fat-tailed distribution instead of the bell-shaped one." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"[…] both rarity and impact have to go into any meaningful characterization of how black any particular [black] swan happens to be." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"Due to the problem of predicting outlier events, they are not usually factored into the design of systems." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"Forecasting models […] ordinarily are based only on past data, which is generally a tiny sample of the total range of possible outcomes. The problem is that those 'experts' who develop the models often come to believe they have mapped the entire space of possible system behaviors, which could not be further from the truth. Worse yet, when outliers do crop up, they are often discounted as 'once in a century' events and are all but ignored in planning for the future. […] the world is much more unpredictable than we’d like to believe."(John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"If you want a system - economic, social, political, or otherwise - to operate at a high level of efficiency, then you have to optimize its operation in such a way that its resilience is dramatically reduced to unknown - and possibly unknowable - shocks and/or changes in its operating environment. In other words, there is an inescapable price to be paid in efficiency in order to gain the benefits of adaptability and survivability in a highly uncertain environment. There is no escape clause!" (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"Sustainability is a delicate balancing act calling upon us to remain on the narrow path between organization and chaos, simplicity and complexity." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"The first path of increasing complexity via innovation often faces limits as to how much complexity can be added or reduced in a given system. This is because if you change the complexity level in one place, a compensating change in the opposite direction generally occurs somewhere else." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"[…] the law of requisite complexity […] states that in order to fully regulate/control a system, the complexity of the controller has to be at least as great as the complexity of the system that’s being controlled. To put it in even simpler terms, only complexity can destroy complexity." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

"What is and isn’t complex depends to a large degree not only on a target system, but also on the system(s) the target interacts with, together with the overall context in which the interacting systems are embedded." (John L Casti, "X-Events: The Collapse of Everything", 2012)

✒️Stephen G Haines - Collected Quotes

"Delay time, the time between causes and their impacts, can highly influence systems. Yet the concept of delayed effect is often missed in our impatient society, and when it is recognized, it’s almost always underestimated. Such oversight and devaluation can lead to poor decision making as well as poor problem solving, for decisions often have consequences that don’t show up until years later. Fortunately, mind mapping, fishbone diagrams, and creativity/brainstorming tools can be quite useful here." (Stephen G Haines, "The Managers Pocket Guide to Systems Thinking & Learning", 1998)

"Our simplistic cause-effect analyses, especially when coupled with the desire for quick fixes, usually lead to far more problems than they solve - impatience and knee-jerk reactions included. If we stop for a moment and take a good look our world and its seven levels of complex and interdependent systems, we begin to understand that multiple causes with multiple effects are the true reality, as are circles of causality-effects." (Stephen G Haines, "The Managers Pocket Guide to Systems Thinking & Learning", 1998)

"Strategic planning and strategic change management are really 'strategic thinking'. It’s about clarity and simplicity, meaning and purpose, and focus and direction." (Stephen G Haines, "The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Planning and Management", 2000)

"Systems thinking is based on the theory that a system is, in essence, circular. Using a systems approach in your strategic management, therefore, provides a circular implementing structure that can evolve, with continuously improving, self-checking, and learning capabilities [...]" (Stephen G Haines, "The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Planning and Management", 2000)

"The systems approach, on the other hand, provides an expanded structural design of organizations as living systems that more accurately reflects reality." (Stephen G Haines, "The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Planning and Management", 2000)

"This is what systems thinking is all about: the idea of building an organization in which each piece, and partial solution of the organization has the fit, alignment, and integrity with your overall organization as a system, and its outcome of serving the customer." (Stephen G Haines, "The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Planning and Management", 2000)

"True systems thinking, on the other hand, studies each problem as it relates to the organization’s objectives and interaction with its entire environment, looking at it as a whole within its universe. Taking your organization from a partial systems to a true systems state requires effective strategic management and backward thinking." (Stephen G Haines, "The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Planning and Management", 2000)