📉Graphical Representation: Indexes (Just the Quotes)

"To a very striking degree our culture has become a Statistical culture. Even a person who may never have heard of an index number is affected [...] by [...] of those index numbers which describe the cost of living. It is impossible to understand Psychology, Sociology, Economics, Finance or a Physical Science without some general idea of the meaning of an average, of variation, of concomitance, of sampling, of how to interpret charts and tables." (Carrol D Wright, 1887)

"It had appeared from observation, and it was fully confirmed by this theory, that such a thing existed as an 'Index of Correlation', that is to say, a fraction, now commonly written T, that connects with close approximation every value of the deviation on the part of the subject, with the average of all the associated deviations of the Relative [...]" (Francis Galton, "Memories of My Life", 1908)

"In any chart where index numbers are used the greatest care should be taken to select as unity a set of conditions thoroughly typical and representative. It is frequently best to take as unity the average of a series of years immediately preceding the years for which a study is to be made. The series of years averaged to represent unity should, if possible, be so selected that they will include one full cycle or wave of fluctuation. If one complete cycle involves too many years, the years selected as unity should be taken in equal number on either side of a year which represents most nearly the normal condition." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"In all chart-making, the material to be shown must be accurately compiled before it can be charted. For an understanding of the classification chart, we must delve somewhat into the mysteries of the various methods of classification and indexing. The art of classifying calls into play the power of visualizing a 'whole' together with all its 'parts'. Even in the most exact science, it is not always easy to break up a whole into a complete set of the distinct, mutually exclusive parts which together exactly compose it." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"[…] statistical literacy. That is, the ability to read diagrams and maps; a 'consumer' understanding of common statistical terms, as average, percent, dispersion, correlation, and index number."  (Douglas Scates, "Statistics: The Mathematics for Social Problems", 1943)

"The use of two or more amount scales for comparisons of series in which the units are unlike and, therefore, not comparable [...] generally results in an ineffective and confusing presentation which is difficult to understand and to interpret. Comparisons of this nature can be much more clearly shown by reducing the components to a comparable basis as percentages or index numbers." (Rufus R Lutz, "Graphic Presentation Simplified", 1949)

"It is really questionable - though bordering on heresy to put the question - whether we would be any the worse off if the whole bag of tricks were scrapped. So many of these index numbers are so ancient and so out of date, so out of touch with reality, so completely devoid of practical value when they have been computed, that their regular calculation must be regarded as a widespread compulsion neurosis. Only lunatics and public servants with no other choice go on doing silly things and liking it." (Michael J Moroney, "Facts from Figures", 1951)

"The economists, of course, have great fun - and show remarkable skill - in inventing more refined index numbers. Sometimes they use geometric averages instead of arithmetic averages (the advantage here being that the geometric average is less upset by extreme oscillations in individual items), sometimes they use the harmonic average. But these are all refinements of the basic idea of the index number [...]" (Michael J Moroney, "Facts from Figures", 1951)

"Index numbers are today one of the most widely used statistical devices…They are used to take the pulse of the economy and they have come to be used as indicators of inflationary or deflationary tendencies." (George Simpson & Fritz Kafka, "Basic Statistics", 1952)

"The great trouble with all business data upon which the statisticians and economists base their forecasts is that they are ancient history before they ever become available. They pertain to conditions which existed some weeks or months previous. The figures for what is going on at the moment in all lines of business are never available. A business index, while of great interest and value, is always historical and never predictive." (Walter E Weld, "How to Chart; Facts from Figures with Graphs", 1959)

"Every economic and social situation or problem is now described in statistical terms, and we feel that it is such statistics which give us the real basis of fact for understanding and analysing problems and difficulties, and for suggesting remedies. In the main we use such statistics or figures without any elaborate theoretical analysis; little beyond totals, simple averages and perhaps index numbers. Figures have become the language in which we describe our economy or particular parts of it, and the language in which we argue about policy." (Ely Devons, "Essays in Economics", 1961)

"The fact that index numbers attempt to measure changes of items gives rise to some knotty problems. The dispersion of a group of products increases with the passage of time, principally because some items have a long-run tendency to fall while others tend to rise. Basic changes in the demand is fundamentally responsible. The averages become less and less representative as the distance from the period increases." (Anna C Rogers, "Graphic Charts Handbook", 1961)

"Index number is a statistical device for indicating the relative movements of the data where measurement of actual movements is difficult or incapable of being made." (Harold J Wheldon, "Business Statistics and Statistical Methods", 1968)

"The numerous design possibilities include several varieties of line graphs that are geared to particular types of problems. The design of a graph should be adapted to the type of data being structured. The data might be percentages, index numbers, frequency distributions, probability distributions, rates of change, numbers of dollars, and so on. Consequently, the designer must be prepared to structure his graph accordingly." (Cecil H Meyers, "Handbook of Basic Graphs: A modern approach", 1970)

"A statistical index has all the potential pitfalls of any descriptive statistic - plus the distortions introduced by combining multiple indicators into a single number. By definition, any index is going to be sensitive to how it is constructed; it will be affected both by what measures go into the index and by how each of those measures is weighted." (Charles Wheelan, "Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data", 2012)

"Once these different measures of performance are consolidated into a single number, that statistic can be used to make comparisons […] The advantage of any index is that it consolidates lots of complex information into a single number. We can then rank things that otherwise defy simple comparison […] Any index is highly sensitive to the descriptive statistics that are cobbled together to build it, and to the weight given to each of those components. As a result, indices range from useful but imperfect tools to complete charades." (Charles Wheelan, "Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data", 2012)

"Index number shows by its variations the changes in a magnitude which is not susceptible either of accurate measurement in itself or of direct valuation in practice." (Francis Y Edgeworth)

"The formula for calculating an index number should be such that it gives the same ratio between one point of comparison and the other, no matter which of the two is taken as the base or putting it another way, the index number reckoned forward should be reciprocal of the one reckoned backward." (Irving Fisher)

📉Graphical Representation: Flow Charts (Just the Quotes)

"Although flow charts are not used to portray or interpret statistical data, they possess definite utility for certain kinds of research and administrative problems. With a well-designed flow chart it is possible to present a large number of facts and relationships simply, clearly, and accurately, without resorting to extensive or involved verbal description." (Anna C Rogers, "Graphic Charts Handbook", 1961)

"A model is a qualitative or quantitative representation of a process or endeavor that shows the effects of those factors which are significant for the purposes being considered. A model may be pictorial, descriptive, qualitative, or generally approximate in nature; or it may be mathematical and quantitative in nature and reasonably precise. It is important that effective means for modeling be understood such as analog, stochastic, procedural, scheduling, flow chart, schematic, and block diagrams." (Harold Chestnut, "Systems Engineering Tools", 1965)

"There are several classes of flowcharts used in recording study data in the Workbook. The purpose of any chart; of course, is to clarify and to make the information more understandable. One of these types of charts is a Process Flow Chart. It concerns itself with the flow of physical materials, including documents, through a system, especially in terms of distance and time. It is most useful in analyzing some of the cost and benefit factors for existing and proposed systems. System flowcharts [...] have been called the analyst's 'shorthand'. They can be forms-oriented or task-oriented. These flowcharts are not only the primary way of recording data pertinent to the current system, but are used for developing and displaying the new system as well. Later, in the implementation phase, program flowcharts, a fundamental tool of programming, would be developed." (Robert D Carlsen, "The Systems Analysis Workbook: A complete guide to project implementation and control", 1973)

"Flow charts show the decision structure of a program, which is only one aspect of its structure. They show decision structure rather elegantly when the flow chart is on one page, but the overview breaks down badly when one has multiple pages, sewed together with numbered exits and connectors." (Fred P Brooks, "The Mythical Man-Month: Essays", 1975)

"The flow chart is a most thoroughly oversold piece of program documentation. Many programs don't need flow charts at all; few programs need more than a one-page flow chart. [...] In fact, flow charting is more preached than practiced." (Fred P Brooks, "The Mythical Man-Month: Essays", 1975)

"A flow chart is a graphic method to show pictorially how a series of activities, procedures. operations. events. ideas, or other factors are related to each other. It shows the sequence, cycle. or flow of these factors and how they are connected in a series of steps from beginning to end." (Robert Lefferts, "Elements of Graphics: How to prepare charts and graphs for effective reports", 1981)

"Automation is certainly one way to improve the leverage of all types of work. Having machines to help them, human beings can create more output. But in both widget manufacturing and administrative work, something else can also increase the productivity of the black box. This is called work simplification. To get leverage this way, you first need to create a flow chart of the production process as it exists. Every single step must be shown on it; no step should be omitted in order to pretty things up on paper. Second, count the number of steps in the flow chart so that you know how many you started with. Third, set a rough target for reduction of the number of steps." (Andrew S Grove, "High Output Management", 1983)

"System dynamics [...] uses models and computer simulations to understand behavior of an entire system, and has been applied to the behavior of large and complex national issues. It portrays the relationships in systems as feedback loops, lags, and other descriptors to explain dynamics, that is, how a system behaves over time. Its quantitative methodology relies on what are called 'stock-and-flow diagrams' that reflect how levels of specific elements accumulate over time and the rate at which they change. Qualitative systems thinking constructs evolved from this quantitative discipline." (Karen L Higgins, "Economic Growth and Sustainability: Systems Thinking for a Complex World", 2015)

📉Graphical Representation: Tree Maps (Just the Quotes)

"The great advantage of the treemap over conventional tree views is that the amount of information on each branch of the tree can be easily visualized. Because the method is space-filling, it can show quite large trees containing thousands of branches. The disadvantage is that the hierarchical structure is not as clear as it is in a more conventional tree drawing, which is a specialized form of node–link diagram." (Colin Ware, "Information Visualization: Perception for Design" 2nd Ed., 2004)

"Like a pie chart, a treemap is used for a part-of-a-whole analysis, but because you have better control over the rectangle sizes than over slices, you can have many more data points. Unlike with traditional pie charts, you can arrange the data hierarchically. You can compare a rectangle to all data points or to its own branch." (Jorge Camões, "Data at Work: Best practices for creating effective charts and information graphics in Microsoft Excel", 2016)

"Tree maps are similar to pie charts in that they show parts of a whole but, unlike pie charts, they can incorporate more individual pieces without cluttering the graphic. Tree maps are particularly good at presenting information like budgets, which often include more elements than can be effectively communicated through a pie chart." (Christopher Lysy, "Developments in Quantitative Data Display and Their Implications for Evaluation", 2013)

"Even though its recursive composition is similar to rectangular treemaps, the Voronoi treemap allows an improved sub division of a given area that avoids similar shapes and aspect ratios, by making the location and contour of individual cells highly adaptive and configurable. Due to their flexible organizational principle, Voronoi treemaps are known for their organic layouts, featuring a rich, diverse assortment of shapes and con figurations that can resemble stained glass or enthralling natural patterns. The model has wide applicability and it has proved popular in the visualization of file systems and genome data." (Manuel Lima, "The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge", 2014)

"Of all visualization models, vertical trees are the ones that retain the strongest resemblance to figurative trees, due to their vertical layout and forking arrangement from a central trunk. In most cases they are inverted trees, with the root at the top, emphasizing the notion of descent and representing a more natural writing pattern from top to bottom." (Manuel Lima, "The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge", 2014)

"Sunbursts, also known as radial treemaps, tree rings, fan charts, or nested pie charts, are a space-filling visualization technique that uses a radial layout, as opposed to the more widespread rectangular type. Similar to radial trees, sunbursts normally start with a central root, or top level of hierarchy, with the remaining ranks expanding outward from the middle. However, instead of a node-link construct sunbursts employ a sequence of segmented rings and juxtaposed cells" (Manuel Lima, "The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge", 2014)

"The rectangular treemap, sometimes called the mosaic graph, is a space-filling visualization model used for displaying hierarchical data by means of nested rectangles. Each major branch of the tree is depicted as a rectangle, which is then sequentially tiled with smaller rectangles representing its subbranches. The area of each individual cell generally corresponds to a given quantity or data attri bute, for example size, length, price, time, or temperature. Color can indicate an additional quality, such as type, class, gender, or category." (Manuel Lima, "The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge", 2014)

"The decomposition tree is an interactive visualization for hierarchical data. The concept is to take a single metric and drill it down into various dimensions." (Alex Kolokolov & Maxim Zelensky, "Data Visualization with Microsoft Power BI", 2024)

"Treemap is a visualization type used to display hierarchical data in a more structured way than pie or donut charts. In a treemap, rectangles are used instead of sectors. A treemap utilizes space more efficiently and accommodates a larger number of elements." (Alex Kolokolov & Maxim Zelensky, "Data Visualization with Microsoft Power BI", 2024)

📉Graphical Representation: Phenomena (Just the Quotes)

"If statistical graphics, although born just yesterday, extends its reach every day, it is because it replaces long tables of numbers and it allows one not only to embrace at glance the series of phenomena, but also to signal the correspondences or anomalies, to find the causes, to identify the laws." (Émile Cheysson, cca. 1877)

"The information on a plot should be relevant to the goals of the analysis. This means that in choosing graphical methods we should match the capabilities of the methods to our needs in the context of each application. [...] Scatter plots, with the views carefully selected as in draftsman's displays, casement displays, and multiwindow plots, are likely to be more informative. We must be careful, however, not to confuse what is relevant with what we expect or want to find. Often wholly unexpected phenomena constitute our most important findings." (John M Chambers et al, "Graphical Methods for Data Analysis", 1983)

"Information needs representation. The idea that it is possible to communicate information in a 'pure' form is fiction. Successful risk communication requires intuitively clear representations. Playing with representations can help us not only to understand numbers (describe phenomena) but also to draw conclusions from numbers" (make inferences). There is no single best representation, because what is needed always depends on the minds that are doing the communicating." (Gerd Gigerenzer, "Calculated Risks: How to know when numbers deceive you", 2002)

"[…] a graph is nothing but a visual metaphor. To be truthful, it must correspond closely to the phenomena it depicts: longer bars or bigger pie slices must correspond to more, a rising line must correspond to an increasing amount. If a graphical depiction of data does not faithfully follow this principle, it is almost sure to be misleading. But the metaphoric attachment of a graphic goes farther than this. The character of the depiction ism a necessary and sufficient condition for the character of the data. When the data change, so too must their depiction; but when the depiction changes very little, we assume that the data, likewise, are relatively unchanging. If this convention is not followed, we are usually misled." (Howard Wainer, "Graphic Discovery: A trout in the milk and other visuals" 2nd, 2008)

"Nothing that had been produced before was even close. Even today, after more than two centuries of graphical experience, Playfair’s graphs remain exemplary standards for clearcommunication of quantitative phenomena. […] Graphical forms were available before Playfair, but they were rarely used to plot empirical information." (Howard Wainer, "Graphic Discovery: A trout in the milk and other visuals" 2nd, 2008)

"Oftentimes a statistical graphic provides the evidence for a plausible story, and the evidence, though perhaps only circumstantial, can be quite convincing. […] But such graphical arguments are not always valid. Knowledge of the underlying phenomena and additional facts may be required." (Howard Wainer, "Graphic Discovery: A trout in the milk and other visuals" 2nd, 2008)

"[...] graphical displays can be either figurative or non-figurative.[…] Other graphics that display abstract phenomena are non-figurative. In these ,there is no mimetic correspondence between what is being represented and its representation. The relationship between those two entities is conventional, no tnatural [...]." (Alberto Cairo, "The Functional Art", 2011)

"[...] without conscious effort, the brain always tries to close the distance between observed phenomena and knowledge or wisdom that can help us survive. This is what cognition means. The role of an information architect is to anticipate this process and generate order before people’s brains try to do it on their own." (Alberto Cairo, "The Functional Art", 2011)

"Correlation measures the degree to which two phenomena are related to one another. [...] Two variables are positively correlated if a change in one is associated with a change in the other in the same direction, such as the relationship between height and weight. [...] A correlation is negative if a positive change in one variable is associated with a negative change in the other, such as the relationship between exercise and weight." (Charles Wheelan, "Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data", 2012)

"The first epistemic principle to embrace is that there is always a gap between our data and the real world. We fall headfirst into a pitfall when we forget that this gap exists, that our data isn't a perfect reflection of the real-world phenomena it's representing. Do people really fail to remember this? It sounds so basic. How could anyone fall into such an obvious trap?" (Ben Jones, "Avoiding Data Pitfalls: How to Steer Clear of Common Blunders When Working with Data and Presenting Analysis and Visualizations", 2020)

"Data visualizations also gain power through how they juxtapose different data sets to draw out a relationship between different phenomena." (Peter A Hall & Patricio Dávila, "Critical Visualization: Rethinking the Representation of Data", 2022)

📉Graphical Representation: Axes (Just the Quotes)

"A type of chart which has received considerable attention of late years and which differs radically from those 'already described is that known as the alinement chart. In the charts hitherto examined the necessary lines were plotted on what are known as rectangular coordinates; that is, the axes on which the values of x and y were plotted met at a right angle. This is by no means a necessary condition. The axes may be parallel [...]" (John B Peddle, "The Construction of Graphical Charts", 1910)

"The graduated lengths along the different axes may be anything we choose to make them. In general, they should be about equal and as long as possible while keeping the size of the chart within reasonable limits." (John B Peddle, "The Construction of Graphical Charts", 1910)

"When an alinement chart is intended to cover a considerable range of values we are confronted with the difficulty that it must be large, and therefore awkward to handle, or we must have scale divisions which are too small for accurate reading. These difficulties may be overcome with but little additional trouble by a system of double graduation of the axes." (John B Peddle, "The Construction of Graphical Charts", 1910)

"Another principle which will quickly appeal to your common sense, is the rule that when zero is real, the zero-line should be extra heavy to make it prominent. Remember that it takes the place of the floor or lower end of the bars in the bar-chart. It should stand out, therefore, in such a way that the reader can easily grasp its significance and compare with it the heights of the points on the curve. The rule is particularly important in cases where the chart extends down below the zero line into the negative side in order to show negative and positive values. On the same principle the 100% line, when it occurs in a chart, should be similarly heavy as it also may be considered a base for zero points, being the point of zero loss or gain. In fact, the rule may be extended to all cases of lines showing significant constant values, and the zero line should not be heavy, unless it has a special significance." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"In short, the rule that no more dimensions or axes should be used in the chart than the data calls for, is fundamental. Violate this rule and you bring down upon your head a host of penalties. In the first place, you complicate your computing processes, or else achieve a grossly deceptive chart. If your chart becomes deceptive, it has defeated its purpose, which was to represent accurately. Unless, of course, you intended to deceive, in which case we are through with you and leave you to Mark Twain’s mercies. If you make your chart accurate, at the cost of considerable square or cube root calculating, you still have no hope, for the chart is not clear; your reader is more than likely to misunderstand it. Confusion, inaccuracy and deception always lie in wait for you down the path departing from the principle we have discussed - and one of them is sure to catch you." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"The ratio chart not only correctly represents relative changes but also indicates absolute amounts at the same time. Because of its distinctive structure, it is referred to as a semilogarithmic chart. The vertical axis is ruled logarithmically and the horizontal axis arithmetically. The continued narrowing of the spacings of the scale divisions on the vertical axis is characteristic of logarithmic rulings; the equal intervals on the horizontal axis are indicative of arithmetic rulings." (Anna C Rogers, "Graphic Charts Handbook", 1961)

"As a general rule, plotted points and graph lines should be given more 'weight' than the axes. In this way the 'meat' will be easily distinguishable from the 'bones'. Furthermore, an illustration composed of lines of unequal weights is always more attractive than one in which all the lines are of uniform thickness. It may not always be possible to emphasise the data in this way however. In a scattergram, for example, the more plotted points there are, the smaller they may need to be and this will give them a lighter appearance. Similarly, the more curves there are on a graph, the thinner the lines may need to be. In both cases, the axes may look better if they are drawn with a somewhat bolder line so that they are easily distinguishable from the data." (Linda Reynolds & Doig Simmonds, "Presentation of Data in Science" 4th Ed, 1984)

"The frequency of labelled scale calibrations on the axes of a graph can significantly affect the accuracy with which it is interpreted. As little interpolation as possible should be required of the user, in order to minimise errors. If single units cannot be marked, it has been suggested that multiples of 2,5 or 10 should be used." (Linda Reynolds & Doig Simmonds, "Presentation of Data in Science" 4th Ed, 1984)

"The plotted points on a graph should always be made to stand out well. They are, after all, the most important feature of a graph, since any lines linking them are nearly always a matter of conjecture. These lines should stop just short of the plotted points so that the latter are emphasised by the space surrounding them. Where a point happens to fall on an axis line, the axis should be broken for a short distance on either side of the point." (Linda Reynolds & Doig Simmonds, "Presentation of Data in Science" 4th Ed, 1984)

"At a simpler level, some elementary but important suggestions for the clarity of graphs are as follows: (i) the axes should be clearly labelled with the names of the variables and the units of measurement; (ii) scale breaks should be used for false origins; (iii) comparison of related diagrams should be made easy, for example by using identical scales of measurement and placing diagrams side by side; (iv) scales should be arranged so that systematic and approximately linear relations are plotted at roughly 45° to the x-axis; (v) legends should make diagrams as nearly self-explanatory, i.e. independent of the text, as is feasible; (vi) interpretation should not be prejudiced by the technique of presentation, for example by superimposing thick smooth curves on scatter diagrams of points faintly reproduced." (David R Cox,"Some Remarks on the Role in Statistics of Graphical Methods", Applied Statistics 27 (1), 1978) 

"Most graphs used in the analysis of data consist of points arising in effect from distinct individuals, although there are certainly other possibilities, such as the use of lines dual to points. In many cases of exploratory analysis, however, the display of supplementary information attached to some or all of the points will be crucial for successful interpretation. The primary co-ordinate axes should, of course, be chosen to express the main dependence explicitly, if not initially certainly in the final presentation of conclusions." David R Cox,"Some Remarks on the Role in Statistics of Graphical Methods", Applied Statistics 27 (1), 1978)

"An axis is the ruler that establishes regular intervals for measuring information. Because it is such a widely accepted convention, it is often taken for granted and its importance overlooked. Axes may emphasize, diminish, distort, simplify, or clutter the information. They must be used carefully and accurately." (Mary H Briscoe, "Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A guide to better posters, presentations, and publications" 2nd ed., 1995)

"Graphic misrepresentation is a frequent misuse in presentations to the nonprofessional. The granddaddy of all graphical offenses is to omit the zero on the vertical axis. As a consequence, the chart is often interpreted as if its bottom axis were zero, even though it may be far removed. This can lead to attention-getting headlines about 'a soar' or 'a dramatic rise (or fall)'. A modest, and possibly insignificant, change is amplified into a disastrous or inspirational trend." (Herbert F Spirer et al, "Misused Statistics" 2nd Ed, 1998)

"If you want to show the growth of numbers which tend to grow by percentages, plot them on a logarithmic vertical scale. When plotted against a logarithmic vertical axis, equal percentage changes take up equal distances on the vertical axis. Thus, a constant annual percentage rate of change will plot as a straight line. The vertical scale on a logarithmic chart does not start at zero, as it shows the ratio of values (in this case, land values), and dividing by zero is impossible." (Herbert F Spirer et al, "Misused Statistics" 2nd Ed, 1998)

"The visual representation of a scale - an axis with ticks - looks like a ladder. Scales are the types of functions we use to map varsets to dimensions. At first glance, it would seem that constructing a scale is simply a matter of selecting a range for our numbers and intervals to mark ticks. There is more involved, however. Scales measure the contents of a frame. They determine how we perceive the size, shape, and location of graphics. Choosing a scale (even a default decimal interval scale) requires us to think about what we are measuring and the meaning of our measurements. Ultimately, that choice determines how we interpret a graphic." (Leland Wilkinson, "The Grammar of Graphics" 2nd Ed., 2005)

"Arbitrary category sequence and misplaced pie chart emphasis lead to general confusion and weaken messages. Although this can be used for quite deliberate and targeted deceit, manipulation of the category axis only really comes into its own with techniques that bend the relationship between the data and the optics in a more calculated way. Many of these techniques are just twins of similar ruses on the value axis. but are none the less powerful for that." (Nicholas Strange, "Smoke and Mirrors: How to bend facts and figures to your advantage", 2007)

"We tend automatically to think of all the categories represented on the horizontal axis of a column Chart as being equally important. They vary of course on the value axis. Otherwise, there would be little point in the chart, but there is somehow this feeling that they are in other respects similar members of a group. This convention can be put to good use to manipulate the message of the most boring bar or column chart." (Nicholas Strange, "Smoke and Mirrors: How to bend facts and figures to your advantage", 2007)

"One of the easiest ways to display data badly is to display as little information as possible. This includes not labelling axes and titles adequately, and not giving units. In addition, information that is displayed can be obscured by including unnecessary and distracting details." (Jenny Freeman et al, "How to Display Data", 2008)

"Histograms are often mistaken for bar charts but there are important differences. Histograms show distribution through the frequency of quantitative values (y axis) against defined intervals of quantitative values (x axis). By contrast, bar charts facilitate comparison of categorical values. One of the distinguishing features of a histogram is the lack of gaps between the bars [...]" (Andy Kirk, "Data Visualization: A successful design process", 2012)

"Because we should, whenever possible, try to understand relationships between variables and not only describe each one of them in isolation, scatter plots are the most powerful charts available to us. The connected scatter plot is not easy to read at first, but I strongly encourage you to become familiar with it - at least during the exploratory stage - to check for relevant shapes in the relationships. Whenever you feel the need to use a dual-axis chart with two independent variables, you should try the connected scatter plot first." (Jorge Camões, "Data at Work: Best practices for creating effective charts and information graphics in Microsoft Excel", 2016)

"The use of dual-axis charts is a subtle form of graphical lie through which [...] a spurious relationship is established between variables. Considering that the author of a dual-axis chart tries to harmonize the representation, it’s natural to break some rules: The vertical scale is one of the first victims." (Jorge Camões, "Data at Work: Best practices for creating effective charts and information graphics in Microsoft Excel", 2016)

📉Graphical Representation: Aggregation (Just the Quotes)

"Modern data graphics can do much more than simply substitute for small statistical tables. At their best, graphics are instruments for reasoning about quantitative information. Often the most effective way to describe, explore, and summarize a set of numbers even a very large set - is to look at pictures of those numbers. Furthermore, of all methods for analyzing and communicating statistical information, well-designed data graphics are usually the simplest and at the same time the most powerful." (Edward R Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information", 1983)

"A good description of the data summarizes the systematic variation and leaves residuals that look structureless. That is, the residuals exhibit no patterns and have no exceptionally large values, or outliers. Any structure present in the residuals indicates an inadequate fit. Looking at the residuals laid out in an overlay helps to spot patterns and outliers and to associate them with their source in the data." (Christopher H Schrnid, "Value Splitting: Taking the Data Apart", 1991)

"Without meaningful data there can be no meaningful analysis. The interpretation of any data set must be based upon the context of those data. Unfortunately, much of the data reported to executives today are aggregated and summed over so many different operating units and processes that they cannot be said to have any context except a historical one - they were all collected during the same time period. While this may be rational with monetary figures, it can be devastating to other types of data." (Donald J Wheeler, "Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos" 2nd Ed., 2000)

"Graphical displays are often constructed to place principal focus on the individual observations in a dataset, and this is particularly helpful in identifying both the typical positions of data points and unusual or influential cases. However, in many investigations, principal interest lies in identifying the nature of underlying trends and relationships between variables, and so it is often helpful to enhance graphical displays in ways which give deeper insight into these features. This can be very beneficial both for small datasets, where variation can obscure underlying patterns, and large datasets, where the volume of data is so large that effective representation inevitably involves suitable summaries." (Adrian W Bowman, "Smoothing Techniques for Visualisation" [in "Handbook of Data Visualization"], 2008)

"In order to be effective a descriptive statistic has to make sense - it has to distill some essential characteristic of the data into a value that is both appropriate and understandable. […] the justification for computing any given statistic must come from the nature of the data themselves - it cannot come from the arithmetic, nor can it come from the statistic. If the data are a meaningless collection of values, then the summary statistics will also be meaningless - no arithmetic operation can magically create meaning out of nonsense. Therefore, the meaning of any statistic has to come from the context for the data, while the appropriateness of any statistic will depend upon the use we intend to make of that statistic." (Donald J Wheeler, "Myths About Data Analysis", International Lean & Six Sigma Conference, 2012)

"A common mistake is that all visualization must be simple, but this skips a step. You should actually design graphics that lend clarity, and that clarity can make a chart 'simple' to read. However, sometimes a dataset is complex, so the visualization must be complex. The visualization might still work if it provides useful insights that you wouldn’t get from a spreadsheet. […] Sometimes a table is better. Sometimes it’s better to show numbers instead of abstract them with shapes. Sometimes you have a lot of data, and it makes more sense to visualize a simple aggregate than it does to show every data point." (Nathan Yau, "Data Points: Visualization That Means Something", 2013)

"A boxplot is a dotplot enhanced with a schematic that provides information about the center and spread of the data, including the median, quartiles, and so on. This is a very useful way of summarizing a variable's distribution. The dotplot can also be enhanced with a diamond-shaped schematic portraying the mean and standard deviation (or the standard error of the mean)." (Forrest W Young et al, "Visual Statistics: Seeing data with dynamic interactive graphics", 2016)

"Just as with aggregated data, an average is a summary statistic that can tell you something about the data - but it is only one metric, and oftentimes a deceiving one at that. By taking all of the data and boiling it down to one value, an average (and other summary statistics) may imply that all of the underlying data is the same, even when it’s not." (John H Johnson & Mike Gluck, "Everydata: The misinformation hidden in the little data you consume every day", 2016)

"Dashboards are a type of multiform visualization used to summarize and monitor data. These are most useful when proxies have been well validated and the task is well understood. This design pattern brings a number of carefully selected attributes together for fast, and often continuous, monitoring - dashboards are often linked to updating data streams. While many allow interactivity for further investigation, they typically do not depend on it. Dashboards are often used for presenting and monitoring data and are typically designed for at-a-glance analysis rather than deep exploration and analysis." (Danyel Fisher & Miriah Meyer, "Making Data Visual", 2018)

"A data visualization, or dashboard, is great for summarizing or describing what has gone on in the past, but if people don’t know how to progress beyond looking just backwards on what has happened, then they cannot diagnose and find the ‘why’ behind it." (Jordan Morrow, "Be Data Literate: The data literacy skills everyone needs to succeed", 2021)

"Visual displays of empirical information are too often thought to be just compact summaries that, at their best, can clarify a muddled situation. This is partially true, as far as it goes, but it omits the magic. […] sometimes, albeit too rarely, the combination of critical questions addressed by important data and illuminated by evocative displays can achieve a transcendent, and often wholly unexpected, result. At their best, visualizations can communicate emotions and feelings in addition to cold, hard facts." (Michael Friendly. "Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization", 2008) 

"Multivariate techniques often summarize or classify many variables to only a few groups or factors (e.g., cluster analysis or multi-dimensional scaling). Parallel coordinate plots can help to investigate the influence of a single variable or a group of variables on the result of a multivariate procedure. Plotting the input variables in a parallel coordinate plot and selecting the features of interest of the multivariate procedure will show the influence of different input variables." (Martin Theus & Simon Urbanek, "Interactive Graphics for Data Analysis: Principles and Examples", 2009)

"Smoothing and aggregating can help us see important features and relationships, but when we have only a handful of observations, smoothing techniques can be misleading. With just a few observations, we prefer rug plots over histograms, box plots, and density curves, and we use scatterplots rather than smooth curves and density contours. This may seem obvious, but when we have a large amount of data, the amount of data in a subgroup can quickly dwindle. This phenomenon is an example of the curse of dimensionality." (Sam Lau et al, "Learning Data Science: Data Wrangling, Exploration, Visualization, and Modeling with Python", 2023)

"Visualisation is fundamentally limited by the number of pixels you can pump to a screen. If you have big data, you have way more data than pixels, so you have to summarise your data. Statistics gives you lots of really good tools for this." (Hadley Wickham)

📉Graphical Representation: Context (Just the Quotes)

"The title for any chart presenting data in the graphic form should be so clear and so complete that the chart and its title could be removed from the context and yet give all the information necessary for a complete interpretation of the data. Charts which present new or especially interesting facts are very frequently copied by many magazines. A chart with its title should be considered a unit, so that anyone wishing to make an abstract of the article in which the chart appears could safely transfer the chart and its title for use elsewhere." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919) 

"Charts and graphs are a method of organizing information for a unique purpose. The purpose may be to inform, to persuade, to obtain a clear understanding of certain facts, or to focus information and attention on a particular problem. The information contained in charts and graphs must, obviously, be relevant to the purpose. For decision-making purposes. information must be focused clearly on the issue or issues requiring attention. The need is not simply for 'information', but for structured information, clearly presented and narrowed to fit a distinctive decision-making context. An advantage of having a 'formula' or 'model' appropriate to a given situation is that the formula indicates what kind of information is needed to obtain a solution or answer to a specific problem." (Cecil H Meyers, "Handbook of Basic Graphs: A modern approach", 1970)

"Generally speaking, a good display is one in which the visual impact of its components is matched to their importance in the context of the analysis. Consider the issue of overplotting." (John M Chambers et al, "Graphical Methods for Data Analysis", 1983)

"Averages, ranges, and histograms all obscure the time-order for the data. If the time-order for the data shows some sort of definite pattern, then the obscuring of this pattern by the use of averages, ranges, or histograms can mislead the user. Since all data occur in time, virtually all data will have a time-order. In some cases this time-order is the essential context which must be preserved in the presentation." (Donald J Wheeler," Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos" 2nd Ed., 2000)

"Without meaningful data there can be no meaningful analysis. The interpretation of any data set must be based upon the context of those data. Unfortunately, much of the data reported to executives today are aggregated and summed over so many different operating units and processes that they cannot be said to have any context except a historical one - they were all collected during the same time period. While this may be rational with monetary figures, it can be devastating to other types of data." (Donald J Wheeler, "Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos" 2nd Ed., 2000)

"Data are not just numbers, they are numbers with a context. [...] In data analysis, context provides meaning." (George W Cobb & David S Moore, "Mathematics, Statistics, and Teaching", American Mathematical Monthly, 1997)

"The content and context of the numerical data determines the most appropriate mode of presentation. A few numbers can be listed, many numbers require a table. Relationships among numbers can be displayed by statistics. However, statistics, of necessity, are summary quantities so they cannot fully display the relationships, so a graph can be used to demonstrate them visually. The attractiveness of the form of the presentation is determined by word layout, data structure, and design." (Gerald van Belle, "Statistical Rules of Thumb", 2002)

"Numbers are often useful in stories because they record a recent change in some amount, or because they are being compared with other numbers. Percentages, ratios and proportions are often better than raw numbers in establishing a context." (Charles Livingston & Paul Voakes, "Working with Numbers and Statistics: A handbook for journalists", 2005)

"The percentage is one of the best (mathematical) friends a journalist can have, because it quickly puts numbers into context. And it's a context that the vast majority of readers and viewers can comprehend immediately." (Charles Livingston & Paul Voakes, "Working with Numbers and Statistics: A handbook for journalists", 2005)

"By showing recent change in relation to many past changes, sparklines provide a context for nuanced analysis - and, one hopes, better decisions. [...] Sparklines efficiently display and narrate binary data (presence/absence, occurrence/non-occurrence, win/loss). [...] Sparklines can simultaneously accommodate several variables. [...] Sparklines can narrate on-going results detail for any process producing sequential binary outcomes." (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006)

"Statistics can certainly pronounce a fact, but they cannot explain it without an underlying context, or theory. Numbers have an unfortunate tendency to supersede other types of knowing. […] Numbers give the illusion of presenting more truth and precision than they are capable of providing." (Ronald J Baker, "Measure what Matters to Customers: Using Key Predictive Indicators", 2006)

"The biggest difference between line graphs and sparklines is that a sparkline is compact with no grid lines. It isnʼt meant to give precise values; rather, it should be considered just like any other word in the sentence. Its general shape acts as another term and lends additional meaning in its context. The driving forces behind these compact sparklines are speed and convenience." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"In order to be effective a descriptive statistic has to make sense - it has to distill some essential characteristic of the data into a value that is both appropriate and understandable. […] the justification for computing any given statistic must come from the nature of the data themselves - it cannot come from the arithmetic, nor can it come from the statistic. If the data are a meaningless collection of values, then the summary statistics will also be meaningless - no arithmetic operation can magically create meaning out of nonsense. Therefore, the meaning of any statistic has to come from the context for the data, while the appropriateness of any statistic will depend upon the use we intend to make of that statistic." (Donald J Wheeler, "Myths About Data Analysis", International Lean & Six Sigma Conference, 2012)

"Context (information that lends to better understanding the who, what, when, where, and why of your data) can make the data clearer for readers and point them in the right direction. At the least, it can remind you what a graph is about when you come back to it a few months later. […] Context helps readers relate to and understand the data in a visualization better. It provides a sense of scale and strengthens the connection between abstract geometry and colors to the real world." (Nathan Yau, "Data Points: Visualization That Means Something", 2013)

"Readability in visualization helps people interpret data and make conclusions about what the data has to say. Embed charts in reports or surround them with text, and you can explain results in detail. However, take a visualization out of a report or disconnect it from text that provides context (as is common when people share graphics online), and the data might lose its meaning; or worse, others might misinterpret what you tried to show." (Nathan Yau, "Data Points: Visualization That Means Something", 2013)

"There is a story in your data. But your tools don’t know what that story is. That’s where it takes you - the analyst or communicator of the information - to bring that story visually and contextually to life." (Cole N Knaflic, "Storytelling with Data: A Data Visualization Guide for Business Professionals", 2015)

"Infographics combine art and science to produce something that is not unlike a dashboard. The main difference from a dashboard is the subjective data and the narrative or story, which enhances the data-driven visual and engages the audience quickly through highlighting the required context." (Travis Murphy, "Infographics Powered by SAS®: Data Visualization Techniques for Business Reporting", 2018)

"Judging relevance is a subjective and contextually driven matter relating to the potential usefulness of your visualisation: am I providing my audience with access to the most useful understanding about this subject? Relevance is a somewhat shifting concept that is, in part, based on qualities such as interestingness and pertinence." (Andy Kirk, "Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data Driven Design" 2nd Ed., 2019)

"The second rule of communication is to know what you want to achieve. Hopefully the aim is to encourage open debate, and informed decision-making. But there seems no harm in repeating yet again that numbers do not speak for themselves; the context, language and graphic design all contribute to the way the communication is received. We have to acknowledge we are telling a story, and it is inevitable that people will make comparisons and judgements, no matter how much we only want to inform and not persuade. All we can do is try to pre-empt inappropriate gut reactions by design or warning." (David Spiegelhalter, "The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data", 2019)

"There is often no one 'best' visualization, because it depends on context, what your audience already knows, how numerate or scientifically trained they are, what formats and conventions are regarded as standard in the particular field you’re working in, the medium you can use, and so on. It’s also partly scientific and partly artistic, so you get to express your own design style in it, which is what makes it so fascinating." (Robert Grant, "Data Visualization: Charts, Maps and Interactive Graphics", 2019)

"When narrative is coupled with data, it helps to explain to your audience what’s happening in the data and why a particular insight is important. Ample context and commentary are often needed to fully appreciate an analysis finding. The narrative element adds structure to the data and helps to guide the audience through the meaning of what’s being shared." (Brent Dykes, "Effective Data Storytelling: How to Drive Change with Data, Narrative and Visuals", 2019)

"Without knowing the source and context, a particular statistic is worth little. Yet numbers and statistics appear rigorous and reliable simply by virtue of being quantitative, and have a tendency to spread." (Carl T Bergstrom & Jevin D West, "Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World", 2020)

"A semantic approach to visualization focuses on the interplay between charts, not just the selection of charts themselves. The approach unites the structural content of charts with the context and knowledge of those interacting with the composition. It avoids undue and excessive repetition by instead using referential devices, such as filtering or providing detail-on-demand. A cohesive analytical conversation also builds guardrails to keep users from derailing from the conversation or finding themselves lost without context. Functional aesthetics around color, sequence, style, use of space, alignment, framing, and other visual encodings can affect how users follow the script." (Vidya Setlur & Bridget Cogley, "Functional Aesthetics for data visualization", 2022)

"A well-designed dashboard needs to provide a similar experience; information cannot be placed just anywhere on the dashboard. Charts that relate to one another are usually positioned close to one another. Important charts often appear larger and more visually prominent than less important ones. In other words, there are natural sizes for how a dashboard comprises charts based on the task and context." (Vidya Setlur & Bridget Cogley, "Functional Aesthetics for data visualization", 2022)

"Coloring needs to be semantically relevant and is also defined by the context." (Vidya Setlur & Bridget Cogley, "Functional Aesthetics for data visualization", 2022)

"For a chart to be truly insightful, context is crucial because it provides us with the visual answer to an important question - 'compared with what'? No number on its own is inherently big or small – we need context to make that judgement. Common contextual comparisons in charts are provided by time ('compared with last year...') and place ('compared with the north...'). With ranking, context is provided by relative performance ('compared with our rivals...')." (Alan Smith, "How Charts Work: Understand and explain data with confidence", 2022)

"Our visual perception is context-dependent; we are not good at seeing things in isolation." (Alan Smith, "How Charts Work: Understand and explain data with confidence", 2022)

"Understanding language goes hand in hand with the ability to integrate complex contextual information into an effective visualization and being able to converse with the data interactively, a term we call analytical conversation. It also helps us think about ways to create artifacts that support and manage how we converse with machines as we see and understand data."(Vidya Setlur & Bridget Cogley, "Functional Aesthetics for data visualization", 2022)

"Understanding the context and the domain of the data is important to help disambiguate concepts. While reasonable defaults can be used to create a visualization, there should be no dead ends. Provide affordances for a user to understand, repair, and refine." (Vidya Setlur & Bridget Cogley, "Functional Aesthetics for data visualization", 2022)

"A chart that knows its context well will naturally end up looking better because it’s showing what it needs to show and nothing else. Good context begets good design. Good charts are only the means to a more profound end: presenting your ideas effectively. Good charts are not the product you’re after. They’re the way to deliver your product - insight." (Scott Berinato, "Good Charts : the HBR guide to making smarter, more persuasive data visualizations", 2023)

"When the colors are dull and neutral, they can communicate a sense of uniformity and an aura of calmness. Grays do a great job of mapping out the context of your story so that the more sharp colors highlight what you’re trying to explain. The power of gray comes in handy for all of our supporting details such as the axis, gridlines, and nonessential data that is included for comparative purposes. By using gray as the primary color in a visualization, we automatically draw our viewers’ eyes to whatever isn’t gray. That way, if we are interested in telling a story about one data point, we can do so quite easily." (Kate Strachnyi, "ColorWise: A Data Storyteller’s Guide to the Intentional Use of Color", 2023)

"Without context, no one […] can say whether that chart is good. In the absence of context, a chart is neither good nor bad. It’s only well built or poorly built. To judge a chart’s value, you need to know more - much more - than whether you used the right chart type, picked good colors, or labeled axes correctly. Those things can help make charts good, but in the absence of context they’re academic considerations. It’s far more important to know Who will see this? What do they want? What do they need? What idea do I want to convey? What could I show? What should I show? Then, after all that, How will I show it?" (Scott Berinato, "Good Charts : the HBR guide to making smarter, more persuasive data visualizations", 2023)

See also the quotes on "Context" in Data Science, Management, Software Engineering 

📉Graphical Representation: Standards (Just the Quotes)

"Graphic representation by means of charts depends upon the super-position of special lines or curves upon base lines drawn or ruled in a standard manner. For the economic construction of these charts as well as their correct use it is necessary that the standard rulings be correctly designed." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)

"Most authors would greatly resent it if they were told that their writings contained great exaggerations, yet many of these same authors permit their work to be illustrated with charts which are so arranged as to cause an erroneous interpretation. If authors and editors will inspect their charts as carefully as they revise their written matter, we shall have, in a very short time, a standard of reliability in charts and illustrations just as high as now found in the average printed page." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919) 

"The principles of charting and curve plotting are not at all complex, and it is surprising that many business men dodge the simplest charts as though they involved higher mathematics or contained some sort of black magic. [...] The trouble at present is that there are no standards by which graphic presentations can be prepared in accordance with definite rules so that their interpretation by the reader may be both rapid and accurate. It is certain that there will evolve for methods of graphic presentation a few useful and definite rules which will correspond with the rules of grammar for the spoken and written language." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919) 

"Though graphic presentations are used to a very large extent to-day there are at present no standard rules by which the person preparing a chart may know that he is following good practice. This is unfortunate because it permits everyone making a chart to follow his own sweet will. Many charts are being put out to-day from which it would seem that the person making them had tried deliberately to get up some method as different as possible from any which had ever been used previously." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919) 

"Though variety in method of charting is sometimes desirable in large reports where numerous illustrations must follow each other closely, or in wall exhibits where there must be a great number of charts in rapid sequence, it is better in general to use a variety of effects simply to attract attention, and to present the data themselves according to standard well-known methods." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"When large numbers of curves and charts are used by a corporation, it will be found advantageous to have certain standard abbreviations and symbols on the face of the chart so that information may be given in condensed form as a signal to anyone reading the charts." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"At the present time there is a total lack of standardization in the form of diagram to use for nearly all classes of representation. This makes it difficult to compare reports of different investigators on the same subject because their diagrams are not constructed alike." (William C Marshall, "Graphical methods for schools, colleges, statisticians, engineers and executives", 1921)

"One important aspect of reality is improvisation; as a result of special structure in a set of data, or the finding of a visualization method, we stray from the standard methods for the data type to exploit the structure or the finding." (William S Cleveland, "Visualizing Data", 1993)

"Making a presentation is a moral act as well as an intellectual activity. The use of corrupt manipulations and blatant rhetorical ploys in a report or presentation - outright lying, flagwaving, personal attacks, setting up phony alternatives, misdirection, jargon-mongering, evading key issues, feigning disinterested objectivity, willful misunderstanding of other points of view - suggests that the presenter lacks both credibility and evidence. To maintain standards of quality, relevance, and integrity for evidence, consumers of presentations should insist that presenters be held intellectually and ethically responsible for what they show and tell. Thus consuming a presentation is also an intellectual and a moral activity." (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006)

"Making an evidence presentation is a moral act as well as an intellectual activity. To maintain standards of quality, relevance, and integrity for evidence, consumers of presentations should insist that presenters be held intellectually and ethically responsible for what they show and tell. Thus consuming a presentation is also an intellectual and a moral activity." (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006)

"Creating effective visualizations is hard. Not because a dataset requires an exotic and bespoke visual representation - for many problems, standard statistical charts will suffice. And not because creating a visualization requires coding expertise in an unfamiliar programming language [...]. Rather, creating effective visualizations is difficult because the problems that are best addressed by visualization are often complex and ill-formed. The task of figuring out what attributes of a dataset are important is often conflated with figuring out what type of visualization to use. Picking a chart type to represent specific attributes in a dataset is comparatively easy. Deciding on which data attributes will help answer a question, however, is a complex, poorly defined, and user-driven process that can require several rounds of visualization and exploration to resolve." (Danyel Fisher & Miriah Meyer, "Making Data Visual", 2018)

"There is often no one 'best' visualization, because it depends on context, what your audience already knows, how numerate or scientifically trained they are, what formats and conventions are regarded as standard in the particular field you’re working in, the medium you can use, and so on. It’s also partly scientific and partly artistic, so you get to express your own design style in it, which is what makes it so fascinating." (Robert Grant, "Data Visualization: Charts, Maps and Interactive Graphics", 2019)

📉Graphical Representation: Success (Just the Quotes)

"A graphic is an illustration that, like a painting or drawing, depicts certain images on a flat surface. The graphic depends on the use of lines and shapes or symbols to represent numbers and ideas and show comparisons, trends, and relationships. The success of the graphic depends on the extent to which this representation is transmitted in a clear and interesting manner." (Robert Lefferts, "Elements of Graphics: How to prepare charts and graphs for effective reports", 1981)

"It is common for positive data to be skewed to the right: some values bunch together at the low end of the scale and others trail off to the high end with increasing gaps between the values as they get higher. Such data can cause severe resolution problems on graphs, and the common remedy is to take logarithms. Indeed, it is the frequent success of this remedy that partly accounts for the large use of logarithms in graphical data display." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"Iteration and experimentation are important for all of data analysis, including graphical data display. In many cases when we make a graph it is immediately clear that some aspect is inadequate and we regraph the data. In many other cases we make a graph, and all is well, but we get an idea for studying the data in a different way with a different graph; one successful graph often suggests another." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"There are some who argue that a graph is a success only if the important information in the data can be seen within a few seconds. While there is a place for rapidly-understood graphs, it is too limiting to make speed a requirement in science and technology, where the use of graphs ranges from, detailed, in-depth data analysis to quick presentation." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"When a graph is constructed, quantitative and categorical information is encoded, chiefly through position, size, symbols, and color. When a person looks at a graph, the information is visually decoded by the person's visual system. A graphical method is successful only if the decoding process is effective. No matter how clever and how technologically impressive the encoding, it is a failure if the decoding process is a failure. Informed decisions about how to encode data can be achieved only through an understanding of the visual decoding process, which is called graphical perception." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"A chart is a bridge between you and your readers. It reveals your skills at comprehending the source information, at mastering presentation methods and at producing the design. Its success depends a great deal on your readers ' understanding of what you are saying, and how you are saying it. Consider how they will use your chart. Will they want to find out from it more information about the subject? Will they just want a quick impression of the data? Or will they use it as a source for their own analysis? Charts rely upon a visual language which both you and your readers must understand." (Bruce Robertson, "How to Draw Charts & Diagrams", 1988)

"Humans may crave absolute certainty; they may aspire to it; they may pretend, as partisans of certain religions do, to have attained it. But the history of science - by far the most successful claim to knowledge accessible to humans - teaches that the most we can hope for is successive improvement in our understanding, learning from our mistakes, an asymptotic approach to the Universe, but with the proviso that absolute certainty will always elude us. We will always be mired in error. The most each generation can hope for is to reduce the error bars a little, and to add to the body of data to which error bars apply." (Carl Sagan, "The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark", 1995)

"Information needs representation. The idea that it is possible to communicate information in a 'pure' form is fiction. Successful risk communication requires intuitively clear representations. Playing with representations can help us not only to understand numbers" (describe phenomena) but also to draw conclusions from numbers" (make inferences). There is no single best representation, because what is needed always depends on the minds that are doing the communicating." (Gerd Gigerenzer, "Calculated Risks: How to know when numbers deceive you", 2002)

"Most dashboards fail to communicate efficiently and effectively, not because of inadequate technology (at least not primarily), but because of poorly designed implementations. No matter how great the technology, a dashboard's success as a medium of communication is a product of design, a result of a display that speaks clearly and immediately. Dashboards can tap into the tremendous power of visual perception to communicate, but only if those who implement them understand visual perception and apply that understanding through design principles and practices that are aligned with the way people see and think." (Stephen Few, "Information Dashboard Design", 2006)

"The key to the success of any visual, beautiful or not, is providing access to information so that the user may gain knowledge. A visual that does not achieve this goal has failed. Because it is the most important factor in determining overall success, the ability to convey information must be the primary driver of the design of a visual." (Noah Iliinsky, "On Beauty", [in "Beautiful Visualization"] 2010)

"Processes take place over time and result in change. However, we’re often constrained to depict processes in static graphics, perhaps even a single image. Luckily, a good static graphic can be just as successful, perhaps even more so, than an animation. Giving the reader the ability to see each 'frame' of time can offer a valuable perspective." (Felice C Frankel & Angela H DePace, "Visual Strategies", 2012)

"With further similarities to small multiples, heatmaps enable us to perform rapid pattern matching to detect the order and hierarchy of different quantitative values across a matrix of categorical combinations. The use of a color scheme with decreasing saturation or increasing lightness helps create the sense of data magnitude ranking." (Andy Kirk, "Data Visualization: A successful design process", 2012)

"By combining the visual and verbal, we set ourselves up for success when it comes to triggering the formation of long-term memories in our audience." (Cole N Knaflic, "Storytelling with Data: A Data Visualization Guide for Business Professionals", 2015)

"Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in many organizations are a broken tool. The KPIs are often a random collection prepared with little expertise, signifying nothing. [...] KPIs should be measures that link daily activities to the organization’s critical success factors (CSFs), thus supporting an alignment of effort within the organization in the intended direction." (David Parmenter, "Key Performance Indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs" 3rd Ed., 2015)

"One of the main problems with the visual approach to statistical data analysis is that it is too easy to generate too many plots: We can easily become totally overwhelmed by the shear number and variety of graphics that we can generate. In a sense, we have been too successful in our goal of making it easy for the user: Many, many plots can be generated, so many that it becomes impossible to understand our data." (Forrest W Young et al, "Visual Statistics: Seeing data with dynamic interactive graphics", 2016)

"We see first what stands out. Our eyes go right to change and difference - peaks, valleys, intersections, dominant colors, outliers. Many successful charts - often the ones that please us the most and are shared and talked about - exploit this inclination by showing a single salient point so clearly that we feel we understand the chart’s meaning without even trying." (Scott Berinato, "Good Charts : the HBR guide to making smarter, more persuasive data visualizations", 2023)

📉Graphical Representation: Scales (Just the Quotes)

"A more important case is where the divisions are laid off to a logarithmic scale. Paper ready ruled in this way may now be had from dealers in mathematical instruments and is valuable for many purposes. On it many problems which would have to be solved by tediously drawn curves, may be worked with ease by straight lines." (John B Peddle, "The Construction of Graphical Charts", 1910)

"When an alinement chart is intended to cover a considerable range of values we are confronted with the difficulty that it must be large, and therefore awkward to handle, or we must have scale divisions which are too small for accurate reading. These difficulties may be overcome with but little additional trouble by a system of double graduation of the axes." (John B Peddle, "The Construction of Graphical Charts", 1910) 

"For a curve the vertical scale. whenever practicable, should be so selected that the zero line will appear on the diagram. [...] If the zero line of the vertical scale will not normally appear on the curve diagram, the zero line should be shown by the use of a horizontal break in the diagram." (Joint Committee on Standards for Graphic Presentation, "Publications of the American Statistical Association" Vol.14 (112), 1915)

"If only one scale is used, it should be placed at the left-hand side of the chart. In very large charts it is sometimes desirable to repeat the scale at the right-hand side as well. Where two different units of measurement are used in the scales, the units should be carefully named so that there will be no danger of the reader's using the right-hand and the left-hand scales interchangeably as though they represented the same unit." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"It should be a strict rule for all kinds of curve plotting that the horizontal scale must be used. for the independent variable and the vertical scale for the dependent variable. When the curves are plotted by this rule the reader can instantly select a set of conditions from the horizontal scale and read the information from the vertical scale. If there were no rule relating to the arrangement of scales for the independent and dependent variables, the reader would never be able to tell whether he should approach a chart from the vertical scale and read the information from the horizontal scale, or the reverse." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"Sometimes the scales of these accompanying charts are so large that the reader is puzzled to get clearly in his mind what the whole chart is driving at. There is a possibility of making a simple chart on such a large scale that the mere size of the chart adds to its complexity by causing the reader to glance from one side of the chart to the other in trying to get a condensed visualization of the chart." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919) 

"The scales of any curve-chart should be so selected that the chart will not be exaggerated in either the horizontal or the vertical direction. It is possible to cause a visual exaggeration of data by carelessly or intentionally selecting a scale which unduly stretches the chart in either the horizontal or the vertical direction. Just as the English language can be used to exaggerate to the ear, so charts can exaggerate to the eye." (Willard C Brinton, "Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts", 1919)

"The zero of the scale should appear on every chart, and should shown by a heavy line carried across the sheet. If this is not done the reader may assume the bottom of the sheet to be zero and so be mis- led. The scale should be graduated from zero to a little over the maximum figure to be plotted on the charts, so that there will be a space between the highest peak on the curve and the top of the chart." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)

"Under certain conditions, however, the ordinary form of graphic chart is slightly misleading. It will be conceded that its true function is to portray comparative fluctuations. This result is practically secured when the factors or quantities compared are nearly of the same value or volume, but analysis will show that this is not accomplished when the amounts compared differ greatly in value or volume. [...] The same criticism applies to charts which employ or more scales for various curve. If the different scale are in proper proportion, the result is the same as with one scale, but when two or more scales are used which are not proportional an indication may be given with respect to comparative fluctuations which is absolutely false." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)

"When dealing with very large quantities it is not always practicable to use a scale which starts at zero, and is carried up by even steps to a figure representing the highest peak on the curve. Such a chart would either be too large for convenient handling, or else the scale would have to be condensed so that only very large fluctuations would be indicated on the curve. In a ease of this kind the best practice is to start the at zero, and just above this point draw a wavy line across the sheet to indicate that the scale is broken at this point. This line can be very easily drawn with an ordinary serrated edge ruler as used by many accountants. The scale starts again on the upper side of the wavy line at a figure a little lower than the lowest point on the curve, and is carried up by even steps to a figure a little above the highest point to be shown on the curve." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)

"With the ordinary scale, fluctuations in large factors are very noticeable, while relatively greater fluctuations in smaller factors are barely apparent. The semi-logarithmic scale permits the graphic representation of changes in every quantity on the same basis, without respect to the magnitude of the quantity itself. At the same time, it shows the actual value by reference to the numbers in the scale column. By indicating both absolute and relative value and changes to one scale, it combines the advantages of both the natural and percentage scale, without the disadvantages of either." (Allan C Haskell, "How to Make and Use Graphic Charts", 1919)

"A further detail of the 100% bar and its labelling, is the scale. This should generally be in hundredths or percents. The data may be entirely in absolute quantities, but nevertheless the scale should show percentages. To prevent the confusion of scale and divisions of the bar, the scale should be outside the bar, and the best practice seems to be to indicate the scale by little notches or short perpendicular lines dropped below the bar, from its lower edge." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"Having prepared your data, you will next decide upon a 'scale’' or ratio of reduction to use in the drawing, that is, what value or distance on the actual floor shall be represented by each space or distance between lines on the paper. It is important to pick a scale which is neither too large nor too small, so that the drawing will be the right size on the sheet." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"In short, the scales on which a curve is drawn can affect very much our impressions of the data by magnifying or minimizing the apparent movements of the curve itself. Of course, this does not mean that the relative height from the base-line of the various points on the curve have been altered. If you have been careful to show the base-line always, the base-line itself will approach nearer to the curve as the vertical scale is reduced and the wiggles are flattened out, and will recede farther from the curve as the vertical scale is enlarged and the wiggles are exaggerated. But it means that the oscillation or fluctuation of the curve will have been made to appear more violent or milder according as either of the scales is changed. And it therefore behooves us to give serious thought to the matter of scales before’ we determine upon them finally for any particular chart. As a matter of fact, we may have to try out several combinations of scales before we find one which gives just the right amount of emphasis to curve fluctuations to suit us." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"When several curves are shown upon the same chart, it is often desirable to use different scales for them. That is, the same horizontal lines may be given two or even more different values for different curves. But even in these cases, it is better to place both scales, once and for all, at the left hand side. The practise of placing one of these scales at the right hand side, and another at the left hand side, has little to recommend it. Theoretically, at least, the left hand end of your chart is normally the y-axis itself, and the scale or scales should logically be attached immediately thereto. In practice this logical position is justified." (Karl G Karsten, "Charts and Graphs", 1925)

"Admittedly a chart is primarily a picture, and for presentation purposes should be treated as such; but in most charts it is desirable to be able to read the approximate magnitudes by reference to the scales. Such reference is almost out of the question without some rulings to guide the eye. Second, the picture itself may be misleading without enough rulings to keep the eye 'honest'. Although sight is the most reliable of our senses for measuring (and most other) purposes, the unaided eye is easily deceived; and there are numerous optical illusions to prove it. A third reason, not vital, but still of some importance, is that charts without rulings may appear weak and empty and may lack the structural unity desirable in any illustration." (Kenneth W Haemer, "Hold That Line. A Plea for the Preservation of Chart Scale Ruling", The American Statistician Vol. 1 (1) 1947)

"[….] double-scale charts are likely to be misleading unless the two zero values coincide (either on or off the chart). To insure an accurate comparison of growth the scale intervals should be so chosen that both curves meet at some point. This treatment produces the effect of percentage relatives or simple index numbers with the point of juncture serving as the base point. The principal advantage of this form of presentation is that it is a short-cut method of comparing the relative change of two or more series without computation. It is especially useful for bringing together series that either vary widely in magnitude or are measured in different units and hence cannot be compared conveniently on a chart having only one absolute-amount scale. In general, the double scale treatment should not be used for presenting growth comparisons to the general reader." (Kenneth W Haemer, "Double Scales Are Dangerous", The American Statistician Vol. 2 (3) , 1948)

"[…] many readers are confused by the presence of two scales, and either use the wrong one or simply disregard both. Also, the general reader has the disconcerting habit of believing that because one curve is higher than another, it is also larger in magnitude. This leads to all sorts of misconceptions." (Kenneth W Haemer, "Double Scales Are Dangerous", The American Statistician Vol. 2 (3) , 1948)

"The ratio chart not only correctly represents relative changes but also indicates absolute amounts at the same time. Because of its distinctive structure, it is referred to as a semilogarithmic chart. The vertical axis is ruled logarithmically and the horizontal axis arithmetically. The continued narrowing of the spacings of the scale divisions on the vertical axis is characteristic of logarithmic rulings; the equal intervals on the horizontal axis are indicative of arithmetic rulings." (Anna C Rogers, "Graphic Charts Handbook", 1961)

"Logging size transforms the original skewed distribution into a more symmetrical one by pulling in the long right tail of the distribution toward the mean. The short left tail is, in addition, stretched. The shift toward symmetrical distribution produced by the log transform is not, of course, merely for convenience. Symmetrical distributions, especially those that resemble the normal distribution, fulfill statistical assumptions that form the basis of statistical significance testing in the regression model." (Edward R Tufte, "Data Analysis for Politics and Policy", 1974)

"Logging skewed variables also helps to reveal the patterns in the data. […] the rescaling of the variables by taking logarithms reduces the nonlinearity in the relationship and removes much of the clutter resulting from the skewed distributions on both variables; in short, the transformation helps clarify the relationship between the two variables. It also […] leads to a theoretically meaningful regression coefficient." (Edward R Tufte, "Data Analysis for Politics and Policy", 1974)

"The logarithmic transformation serves several purposes: (1) The resulting regression coefficients sometimes have a more useful theoretical interpretation compared to a regression based on unlogged variables. (2) Badly skewed distributions - in which many of the observations are clustered together combined with a few outlying values on the scale of measurement - are transformed by taking the logarithm of the measurements so that the clustered values are spread out and the large values pulled in more toward the middle of the distribution. (3) Some of the assumptions underlying the regression model and the associated significance tests are better met when the logarithm of the measured variables is taken." (Edward R Tufte, "Data Analysis for Politics and Policy", 1974)

"At a simpler level, some elementary but important suggestions for the clarity of graphs are as follows: (i) the axes should be clearly labelled with the names of the variables and the units of measurement; (ii) scale breaks should be used for false origins; (iii) comparison of related diagrams should be made easy, for example by using identical scales of measurement and placing diagrams side by side; (iv) scales should be arranged so that systematic and approximately linear relations are plotted at roughly 45° to the x-axis; (v) legends should make diagrams as nearly self-explanatory, i.e. independent of the text, as is feasible; (vi) interpretation should not be prejudiced by the technique of presentation, for example by superimposing thick smooth curves on scatter diagrams of points faintly reproduced." (David R Cox,"Some Remarks on the Role in Statistics of Graphical Methods", Applied Statistics 27 (1), 1978)

"The scales used are important; contracting or expanding the vertical or horizontal scales will change the visual picture. The trend lines need enough grid lines to obviate difficulty in reading the results properly. One must be careful in the use of cross-hatching and shading, both of which can create illusions. Horizontal rulings tend to reduce the appearance. while vertical lines enlarge it. In summary, graphs must be reliable, and reliability depends not only on what is presented but also on how it is presented." (Anker V Andersen, "Graphing Financial Information: How accountants can use graphs to communicate", 1983)

"The time-series plot is the most frequently used form of graphic design. With one dimension marching along to the regular rhythm of seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years, centuries, or millennia, the natural ordering of the time scale gives this design a strength and efficiency of interpretation found in no other graphic arrangement." (Edward R Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information", 1983)

"[changing scales in mid-axis] is a powerful technique that can make large differences look small and make exponential changes look linear." (Howard Wainer, "How to Display Data Badly", The American Statistician Vol. 38(2), 1984)

"One can hide data in a variety of ways. One method that occurs with some regularity is hiding the data in the grid. The grid is useful for plotting the points, but only rarely afterwards. Thus to display data badly, use a fine grid and plot the points dimly [...] A second way to hide the data is in the scale. This corresponds to blowing up the scale (i.e., looking at the data from far away) so that any variation in the data is obscured by the magnitude of the scale. One can justify this practice by appealing to 'honesty requires that we start the scale at zero', or other sorts of sophistry." (Howard Wainer, "How to Display Data Badly", The American Statistician Vol. 38(2), 1984)

"It is common for positive data to be skewed to the right: some values bunch together at the low end of the scale and others trail off to the high end with increasing gaps between the values as they get higher. Such data can cause severe resolution problems on graphs, and the common remedy is to take logarithms. Indeed, it is the frequent success of this remedy that partly accounts for the large use of logarithms in graphical data display." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"When magnitudes are graphed on a logarithmic scale, percents and factors are easier to judge since equal multiplicative factors and percents result in equal distances throughout the entire scale." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"When the data are magnitudes, it is helpful to have zero included in the scale so we can see its value relative to the value of the data. But the need for zero is not so compelling that we should allow its inclusion to ruin the resolution of the data on the graph." (William S Cleveland, "The Elements of Graphing Data", 1985)

"The logarithm is one of many transformations that we can apply to univariate measurements. The square root is another. Transformation is a critical tool for visualization or for any other mode of data analysis because it can substantially simplify the structure of a set of data. For example, transformation can remove skewness toward large values, and it can remove monotone increasing spread. And often, it is the logarithm that achieves this removal." (William S Cleveland, "Visualizing Data", 1993)

"The rule is that a graph of a change in a variable with time should always have a vertical scale that starts with zero. Otherwise, it is inherently misleading." (Douglas A Downing & Jeffrey Clark, "Forgotten Statistics: A Self-Teaching Refresher Course", 1996)

"The more clues to meaning that are supplied elsewhere, the less the need for cluttersome scales." (Eric Meyer, "Designing Infographics", 1997) 

"Choose scales wisely, as they have a profound influence on the interpretation of graphs. Not all scales require that zero be included, but bar graphs and other graphs where area is judged do require it." (Naomi B Robbins, "Creating More effective Graphs", 2005)

"The visual representation of a scale - an axis with ticks - looks like a ladder. Scales are the types of functions we use to map varsets to dimensions. At first glance, it would seem that constructing a scale is simply a matter of selecting a range for our numbers and intervals to mark ticks. There is more involved, however. Scales measure the contents of a frame. They determine how we perceive the size, shape, and location of graphics. Choosing a scale (even a default decimal interval scale) requires us to think about what we are measuring and the meaning of our measurements. Ultimately, that choice determines how we interpret a graphic." (Leland Wilkinson, "The Grammar of Graphics" 2nd Ed., 2005)

"Use a logarithmic scale when it is important to understand percent change or multiplicative factors. […] Showing data on a logarithmic scale can cure skewness toward large values." (Naomi B Robbins, "Creating More effective Graphs", 2005) 

"Use a scale break only when necessary. If a break cannot be avoided, use a full scale break. Taking logs can cure the need for a break." (Naomi B Robbins, "Creating More effective Graphs", 2005)

"It is important to pay heed to the following detail: a disadvantage of logarithmic diagrams is that a graphical integration is not possible, i.e., the area under the curve (the integral) is of no relevance." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)

"Another way to obscure the truth is to hide it with relative numbers. […] Relative scales are always given as percentages or proportions. An increase or decrease of a given percentage only tells us part of the story, however. We are missing the anchoring of absolute values." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"One way a chart can lie is through overemphasis of the size and scale of items, particularly when the dimension of depth isnʼt considered." (Brian Suda, "A Practical Guide to Designing with Data", 2010)

"As with dot plots, the scale on line charts has a lot to do with how the message is conveyed. For example, using too large a scale runs the risk that viewers may gloss over a very important story in the data. However, using too small a scale might lead you to overemphasize minor fluctuations. As with dot plots, designers should plot all of the data points so that the line chart takes up two-thirds of the y-axis’s total scale." (Jason Lankow et al, "Infographics: The power of visual storytelling", 2012)

"Color can tell us where to look, what to compare and contrast, and it can give us a visual scale of measure. Because color can be so effective, it is often used for multiple purposes in the same graphic - which can create graphics that are dazzling but difficult to interpret. Separating the roles that color can play makes it easier to apply color specifically for encouraging different kinds of visual thinking. [...] Choose colors to draw attention, to label, to show relationships (compare and contrast), or to indicate a visual scale of measure." (Felice C Frankel & Angela H DePace, "Visual Strategies", 2012)

"Geographic maps have the advantage of being true to scale - great for walking. Diagrams have the advantage of being easily imaged and remembered, often true to a non-pedestrian experience, and the ability to open up congestion, reduce empty space, and use real estate efficiently. Hybrids 'mapograms' ? - often have the disadvantages of both map and diagram with none of the corresponding advantages." (Joel Katz, "Designing Information: Human factors and common sense in information design", 2012)

"When using dot plots to show a time series relationship, the scale does not have to start at a zero baseline. For the other relationships they do, however. For a time series relationship, the scale can be truncated if there is a story worth telling in the data that would otherwise be obscured by using a very large scale. However, you should use discretion when attempting to do this; a good rule of thumb is to use a scale in which the range of the dot plots consists of two-thirds of the graph’s total height, in order to display data trends more clearly. Additionally, if your goal is to show a time series relationship with continual data, you can throw a line on it, connecting the points. Essentially, you can use a series of straight lines between the points, which will help guide the reader’s eyes from left to right." (Jason Lankow et al, "Infographics: The power of visual storytelling", 2012)

"Context (information that lends to better understanding the who, what, when, where, and why of your data) can make the data clearer for readers and point them in the right direction. At the least, it can remind you what a graph is about when you come back to it a few months later. […] Context helps readers relate to and understand the data in a visualization better. It provides a sense of scale and strengthens the connection between abstract geometry and colors to the real world." (Nathan Yau, "Data Points: Visualization That Means Something", 2013)

"Unfortunately, setting the scale at zero is the best recipe for creating dull charts, in both senses of the word: boring and with little variation. The solution is not to break the scale, but rather to find a similar message that can be communicated using alternative metrics." (Jorge Camões, "Data at Work: Best practices for creating effective charts and information graphics in Microsoft Excel", 2016)

"The use of dual-axis charts is a subtle form of graphical lie through which [...] a spurious relationship is established between variables. Considering that the author of a dual-axis chart tries to harmonize the representation, it’s natural to break some rules: The vertical scale is one of the first victims." (Jorge Camões, "Data at Work: Best practices for creating effective charts and information graphics in Microsoft Excel", 2016)

"Whichever scale is used to represent the data, it is important to keep it consistent in data presentations. The principles of clarity, precision, and efficiency are rarely met if the measurement scales change within tables." (John Hoffmann, "Principles of Data Management and Presentation", 2017)

"Adjusting scale is an important practice in data visualization. While the log transform is versatile, it doesn’t handle all situations where skew or curvature occurs. For example, at times the values are all roughly the same order of magnitude and the log transformation has little impact. Another transformation to consider is the square root transformation, which is often useful for count data." (Sam Lau et al, "Learning Data Science: Data Wrangling, Exploration, Visualization, and Modeling with Python", 2023)

"Researchers have studied how accurately people can read information displayed in different types of plots. They have found the following ordering, from most to least accurately judged (•) Positions along a common scale, like in a rug plot, strip plot, or dot plot (•) Positions on identical, nonaligned scales, like in a bar plot (•) Length, like in a stacked bar plot (•) Angle and slope, like in a pie chart (•) Area, like in a stacked line plot or bubble chart (•) Volume and density, like in a three-dimensional bar plot (•) Color saturation and hue, like when overplotting with semitransparent points."  (Sam Lau et al, "Learning Data Science: Data Wrangling, Exploration, Visualization, and Modeling with Python", 2023)