"Conflicting with the idea of integrating evidence regardless of its these guidelines provoke several issues: First, labels are data. even intriguing data. [...] Second, when labels abandon the data points, then a code is often needed to relink names to numbers. Such codes, keys, and legends are impediments to learning, causing the reader's brow to furrow. Third, segregating nouns from data-dots breaks up evidence on the basis of mode" (verbal vs. nonverbal), a distinction lacking substantive relevance. Such separation is uncartographic; contradicting the methods of map design often causes trouble for any type of graphical display. Fourth, design strategies that reduce data-resolution take evidence displays in the wrong direction. Fifth, what clutter? Even this supposedly cluttered graph clearly shows the main ideas: brain and body mass are roughly linear in logarithms, and as both variables increase, this linearity becomes less tight." (Edward R Tufte, "Beautiful Evidence", 2006) [argumentation against Cleveland's recommendation of not using words on data plots]
"The bar chart is one of the most useful, simple, adaptable, and popular techniques in graphic presentation. The simple bar chart. with its many variations, is particularly appropriate for comparing the magnitude, or size, of coordinate items or of parts of a total. The basis of comparison in the bar chart is linear or one-dimensional. The length of each bar or of its components is proportional to the quantity or amount of each category' represented. " (Calvin F Schmid, "Handbook of Graphic Presentation", 1954)
"The common bar chart is particularly appropriate for comparing magnitude or size of coordinate items or parts of a total. It is one of the most useful, simple, and adaptable techniques in graphic presentation. The basis of comparison in the bar chart is linear or one-dimensional. The length of each bar or of its components is proportional to the quantity or amount of each category represented." (Anna C Rogers, "Graphic Charts Handbook", 1961)
"To analyse graphic representation precisely, it is helpful to distinguish it from musical, verbal and mathematical notations, all of which are perceived in a linear or temporal sequence. The graphic image also differs from figurative representation essentially polysemic, and from the animated image, governed by the laws of cinematographic time. Within the boundaries of graphics fall the fields of networks, diagrams and maps. The domain of graphic imagery ranges from the depiction of atomic structures to the representation of galaxies and extends into the spheres of topography and cartography." (Jacques Bertin, "Semiology of graphics" ["Semiologie Graphique"], 1967)
"Charts not only tell what was, they tell what is; and a trend from was to is" (projected linearly into the will be) contains better percentages than clumsy guessing." (Robert A Levy, "The Relative Strength Concept of Common Stock Forecasting", 1968)
"The circle graph, or pie chart, appears to simple and 'nonstatistical', so it is a popular form of presentation for general readers. However, since the eye can compare linear distances more easily and accurately than angles or areas, the component parts of a total usually can be shown more effectively in a chart using linear measurement." (Peter H Selby, "Interpreting Graphs and Tables", 1976)
"At a simpler level, some elementary but important suggestions for the clarity of graphs are as follows: (i) the axes should be clearly labelled with the names of the variables and the units of measurement; (ii) scale breaks should be used for false origins; (iii) comparison of related diagrams should be made easy, for example by using identical scales of measurement and placing diagrams side by side; (iv) scales should be arranged so that systematic and approximately linear relations are plotted at roughly 45° to the x-axis; (v) legends should make diagrams as nearly self-explanatory, i.e. independent of the text, as is feasible; (vi) interpretation should not be prejudiced by the technique of presentation, for example by superimposing thick smooth curves on scatter diagrams of points faintly reproduced." (David R Cox,"Some Remarks on the Role in Statistics of Graphical Methods", Applied Statistics 27 (1), 1978)
"[changing scales in mid-axis] is a powerful technique that can make large differences look small and make exponential changes look linear." (Howard Wainer, "How to Display Data Badly", The American Statistician Vol. 38(2), 1984)
"Although in most cases the actual value designated by a bar is determined by the location of the end of the bar, many people associate the length or area of the bar with its value. As long as the scale is linear, starts at zero, is continuous, and the bars are the same width, this presents no problem. When any of these conditions are changed, the potential exists that the graph will be misinterpreted." (Robert L Harris, "Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference", 1996)
"One of the classical assumptions in linear regression analysis is that of equal variance, which is frequently referred to as homoscedasticity. However, this assumption may not be valid in data analysis arising from many fields (e.g., economics, finance, engineering, and biological science). When heteroscedasticity (nonconstant variance) occurs, the statistical inferences and predictions via the ordinary least squares method are often not reliable. Therefore, it is crucial to study the heteroscedastic error structure in linear model fitting." (Xiaogang Su et al, "Treed Variance", Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 15 (2), 2006)
"For linear dependences the main information usually lies in the slope. It is obvious that those points that lie far apart have the strongest influence on the slope if all points have the same uncertainty. In this context we speak of the strong leverage of distant points; when determining the parameter 'slope' these distant points carry more effective weight. Naturally, this weight is distinct from the 'statistical' weight usually used in regression analysis." (Manfred Drosg, "Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis", 2007)
"All graphics present data and allow a certain degree of exploration of those same data. Some graphics are almost all presentation, so they allow just a limited amount of exploration; hence we can say they are more infographics than visualization, whereas others are mostly about letting readers play with what is being shown, tilting more to the visualization side of our linear scale. But every infographic and every visualization has a presentation and an exploration component: they present, but they also facilitate the analysis of what they show, to different degrees." (Alberto Cairo, "The Functional Art", 2011)
"[...] communicating with data is less often about telling a specific story and more like starting a guided conversation. It is a dialogue with the audience rather than a monologue. While some data presentations may share the linear approach of a traditional story, other data products" (analytical tools, in particular) give audiences the flexibility for exploration. In our experience, the best data products combine a little of both: a clear sense of direction defined by the author with the ability for audiences to focus on the information that is most relevant to them. The attributes of the traditional story approach combined with the self-exploration approach leads to the guided safari analogy." (Zach Gemignani et al, "Data Fluency", 2014)
See also the quotes on linearity in Data Science
No comments:
Post a Comment